Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Incidence of catheter-related thrombosis in acute leukemia patients: a comparative, retrospective study of the safety of peripherally inserted vs. centrally inserted central venous catheters

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Hematology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Central venous catheters are a leading cause of upper-extremity deep vein thrombosis. Concomitant severe thrombocytopenia makes anticoagulation for catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) in patients with acute leukemia (AL) a challenge. Incidence of CRT has been reported to be increased in those with peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) vs. those with centrally inserted ones (CICC). Our objective is to compare the incidence rate of CRT in leukemia inpatients who received either a PICC vs. CICC. We retrospectively reviewed adult inpatients admitted to hematology wards with a new diagnosis of AL and who received either a PICC or a CICC. Baseline patient and catheter characteristics were recorded. Our primary outcome was the incidence rate of CRT in each group. The secondary outcomes included rates of infectious and mechanical complications. Six hundred sixty-three patients received at least one PICC (338) or CICC (325) insertion. A total of 1331 insertions were recorded, with 82 (11.7 %) and 41 (6.5 %) CRT in the PICC and CICC groups, respectively. The incidence rates were 1.89 and 0.52 per 1000 catheter day in the PICC and CICC groups, respectively. A PICC, when compared to CICC, was a significant risk factor for CRT (sHR 2.5, p < 0.0001). The prevalence and incidence rates of CRT in our AL patients were higher than predicted for a general cancer patient population. These rates were higher in the PICC group compared to the CICC group. We recommend careful consideration of thrombotic and bleeding risks of AL inpatients when choosing a central venous catheter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AL:

Acute leukemia

CICC:

Centrally inserted central venous catheter

CRT:

Catheter-related thrombosis

CVC:

Central venous catheter

DVT:

Deep vein thrombosis

HRT:

Hormonal replacement therapy

HSCT:

Hematopoietic stem cell transplant

OCP:

Oral contraceptive pills

PE:

Pulmonary embolism

PICC:

Peripherally inserted central venous catheter

sHR:

Subhazard ratio

VTE:

Venous thromboembolism

References

  1. Spencer FA, Emery C, Lessard D, Anderson F, Emani S, Aragam J, Becker RC, Goldberg RJ (2006) The Worcester Venous Thromboembolism study: a population-based study of the clinical epidemiology of venous thromboembolism. J Gen Intern Med 21(7):722–727. doi:10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00458.x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Spencer FA, Emery C, Joffe SW, Pacifico L, Lessard D, Reed G, Gore JM, Goldberg RJ (2009) Incidence rates, clinical profile, and outcomes of patients with venous thromboembolism. The Worcester VTE study. J Thromb Thrombolysis 28(4):401–409. doi:10.1007/s11239-009-0378-3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Streiff MB (2013) Association between cancer types, cancer treatments, and venous thromboembolism in medical oncology patients. Clin Adv in Hematol Oncol 11(6):349–357

    Google Scholar 

  4. Smith JR, Friedell ML, Cheatham ML, Martin SP, Cohen MJ, Horowitz JD (1998) Peripherally inserted central catheters revisited. Am J Surg 176(2):208–211

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Geerts W (2014) Central venous catheter-related thrombosis. Hemato Educ Program Am Soc Hematol Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2014(1):306–311. doi:10.1182/asheducation-2014.1.306

    Google Scholar 

  6. Catalano O, Nunziata A, de Lutio di Castelguidone E, d’Errico AG (2011) Thrombosis and cancer: spectrum of multidetector CT findings in oncologic patients with thromboembolic disease. A pictorial review. Acta Radiol (Stockholm, Sweden : 1987) 52(7):730–737. doi:10.1258/ar.2011.100513

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mollee P, Jones M, Stackelroth J, van Kuilenburg R, Joubert W, Faoagali J, Looke D, Harper J, Clements A (2011) Catheter-associated bloodstream infection incidence and risk factors in adults with cancer: a prospective cohort study. J Hosp Infect 78(1):26–30. doi:10.1016/j.jhin.2011.01.018

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Saber W, Moua T, Williams EC, Verso M, Agnelli G, Couban S, Young A, De Cicco M, Biffi R, van Rooden CJ, Huisman MV, Fagnani D, Cimminiello C, Moia M, Magagnoli M, Povoski SP, Malak SF, Lee AY (2011) Risk factors for catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) in cancer patients: a patient-level data (IPD) meta-analysis of clinical trials and prospective studies. J Thromb Haemost 9(2):312–319. doi:10.1111/j.1538-7836.2010.04126.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Chopra V, Anand S, Hickner A, Buist M, Rogers MA, Saint S, Flanders SA (2013) Risk of venous thromboembolism associated with peripherally inserted central catheters: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 382(9889):311–325. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)60592-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu Y, Gao Y, Wei L, Chen W, Ma X, Song L (2015) Peripherally inserted central catheter thrombosis incidence and risk factors in cancer patients: a double-center prospective investigation. Ther Clin Risk Manag 11:153–160. doi:10.2147/tcrm.s73379

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Cortelezzi A, Moia M, Falanga A, Pogliani EM, Agnelli G, Bonizzoni E, Gussoni G, Barbui T, Mannucci PM (2005) Incidence of thrombotic complications in patients with haematological malignancies with central venous catheters: a prospective multicentre study. Br J Haematol 129(6):811–817. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2141.2005.05529.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Worth LJ, Seymour JF, Slavin MA (2009) Infective and thrombotic complications of central venous catheters in patients with hematological malignancy: prospective evaluation of nontunneled devices. Support Care Cancer 17(7):811–818. doi:10.1007/s00520-008-0561-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tran H, Arellano M, Chamsuddin A, Flowers C, Heffner LT, Langston A, Lechowicz MJ, Tindol A, Waller E, Winton EF, Khoury HJ (2010) Deep venous thromboses in patients with hematological malignancies after peripherally inserted central venous catheters. Leuk Lymphoma 51(8):1473–1477. doi:10.3109/10428194.2010.481065

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sriskandarajah P, Webb K, Chisholm D, Raobaikady R, Davis K, Pepper N, Ethell ME, Potter MN, Shaw BE (2015) Retrospective cohort analysis comparing the incidence of deep vein thromboses between peripherally-inserted and long-term skin tunneled venous catheters in hemato-oncology patients. Thromb J 13:21. doi:10.1186/s12959-015-0052-2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Mohren M, Markmann I, Jentsch-Ullrich K, Koenigsmann M, Lutze G, Franke A (2006) Increased risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with acute leukaemia. Br J Cancer 94(2):200–202. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6602945

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Kopolovic I, Lee AY, Wu C (2015) Management and outcomes of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism in patients with concomitant thrombocytopenia: a retrospective cohort study. Ann Hematol 94(2):329–336. doi:10.1007/s00277-014-2198-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fine J, Gray R (1999) A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. J Am Stat Assoc 94(446):496–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Campigotto F, Neuberg D, Zwicker JI (2012) Accounting for death as a competing risk in cancer-associated thrombosis studies. Thromb Res 129(Suppl 1):S85–S87. doi:10.1016/s0049-3848(12)70023-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. StataCorp (2013) Stata Statistical Software, vol Release 13. StataCorp LP, College Station

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kim HJ, Yun J, Kim HJ, Kim KH, Kim SH, Lee SC, Bae SB, Kim CK, Lee NS, Lee KT, Park SK, Won JH, Park HS, Hong DS (2010) Safety and effectiveness of central venous catheterization in patients with cancer: prospective observational study. J Korean Med Sci 25(12):1748–1753. doi:10.3346/jkms.2010.25.12.1748

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Ratcliffe M, Broadfoot C, Davidson M, Kelly KF, Greaves M (1999) Thrombosis, markers of thrombotic risk, indwelling central venous catheters and antithrombotic prophylaxis using low-dose warfarin in subjects with malignant disease. Clin Lab Haematol 21(5):353–357

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cortelezzia A, Fracchiolla NS, Maisonneuve P, Moia M, Luchesini C, Ranzi ML, Monni P, Pasquini MC, Lambertenghi-Deliliers G (2003) Central venous catheter-related complications in patients with hematological malignancies: a retrospective analysis of risk factors and prophylactic measures. Leuk Lymphoma 44(9):1495–1501. doi:10.3109/10428190309178770

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Abdelkefi A, Torjman L, Ladeb S, Othman TB, Achour W, Lakhal A, Hsairi M, Kammoun L, Hassen AB, Abdeladhim AB (2005) Randomized trial of prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infection by continuous infusion of low-dose unfractionated heparin in patients with hematologic and oncologic disease. J Clin Oncol 23(31):7864–7870. doi:10.1200/jco.2004.00.9787

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lordick F, Hentrich M, Decker T, Hennig M, Pohlmann H, Hartenstein R, Peschel C (2003) Ultrasound screening for internal jugular vein thrombosis aids the detection of central venous catheter-related infections in patients with haemato-oncological diseases: a prospective observational study. Br J Haematol 120(6):1073–1078

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. van Rooden CJ, Schippers EF, Barge RM, Rosendaal FR, Guiot HF, van der Meer FJ, Meinders AE, Huisman MV (2005) Infectious complications of central venous catheters increase the risk of catheter-related thrombosis in hematology patients: a prospective study. J Clin Oncol 23(12):2655–2660. doi:10.1200/jco.2005.05.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Yardim H, Erkoc R, Soyoral YU, Begenik H, Avcu S (2012) Assessment of internal jugular vein thrombosis due to central venous catheter in hemodialysis patients: a retrospective and prospective serial evaluation with ultrasonography. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 18(6):662–665. doi:10.1177/1076029611432739

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Aw A, Carrier M, Koczerginski J, McDiarmid S, Tay J (2012) Incidence and predictive factors of symptomatic thrombosis related to peripherally inserted central catheters in chemotherapy patients. Thromb Res 130(3):323–326. doi:10.1016/j.thromres.2012.02.048

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Cushman M, Kuller LH, Prentice R, Rodabough RJ, Psaty BM, Stafford RS, Sidney S, Rosendaal FR (2004) Estrogen plus progestin and risk of venous thrombosis. JAMA 292(13):1573–1580. doi:10.1001/jama.292.13.1573

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 138 (2013) Inherited thrombophilias in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 122(3):706–717. doi:10.1097/01.AOG.0000433981.36184.4e

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Grainge MJ, West J, Card TR (2010) Venous thromboembolism during active disease and remission in inflammatory bowel disease: a cohort study. Lancet 375(9715):657–663. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(09)61963-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Prandoni P, Lensing AW, Cogo A, Cuppini S, Villalta S, Carta M, Cattelan AM, Polistena P, Bernardi E, Prins MH (1996) The long-term clinical course of acute deep venous thrombosis. Ann Intern Med 125(1):1–7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Samama MM (2000) An epidemiologic study of risk factors for deep vein thrombosis in medical outpatients: the Sirius study. Arch Intern Med 160(22):3415–3420

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Allman-Farinelli MA (2011) Obesity and venous thrombosis: a review. Semin Thromb Hemost 37(8):903–907. doi:10.1055/s-0031-1297369

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Freeman AL, Pendleton RC, Rondina MT (2010) Prevention of venous thromboembolism in obesity. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 8(12):1711–1721. doi:10.1586/erc.10.160

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Elishoov H, Or R, Strauss N, Engelhard D (1998) Nosocomial colonization, septicemia, and Hickman/Broviac catheter-related infections in bone marrow transplant recipients. A 5-year prospective study. Medicine 77(2):83–101

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Yap YS, Karapetis C, Lerose S, Iyer S, Koczwara B (2006) Reducing the risk of peripherally inserted central catheter line complications in the oncology setting. Eur J Cancer Care 15(4):342–347. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2354.2006.00664.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Boersma RS, Jie KS, Verbon A, van Pampus EC, Schouten HC (2008) Thrombotic and infectious complications of central venous catheters in patients with hematological malignancies. Ann Oncol 19(3):433–442. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdm350

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. de Marie S (1993) Diseases and drug-related interventions affecting host defence. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 12(Suppl 1):S36–S41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors’ contribution

M. Refaei and C. Wu developed the research protocol. M. Refaei and B. Fernandes performed primary data collection. M. Refaei prepared the manuscript. A. Pokhrel performed statistical analysis. Manuscript was reviewed and approved for publication by J. Brandwein, M. D. Goodyear, and C. Wu.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cynthia Wu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approvals from both cities were obtained (Edmonton Pro00051738; Calgary REB14-1916), in keeping with the Canadian Tri-Council Policy statement on ethical conduct for research.

Conflict of interest

C. Wu is a member on advisory board with honoraria from Leo Pharma and Pfizer. M.D. Goodyear has received research grants from Bayer and Pfizer. The rest of the authors declare no conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplemental Table S1-Table S3

Incidence of Catheter-related Thrombosis in Acute Leukemia patients: a comparative, retrospective study of the safety of Peripherally-Inserted vs. Centrally-Inserted Central Venous Catheters. (DOCX 84 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Refaei, M., Fernandes, B., Brandwein, J. et al. Incidence of catheter-related thrombosis in acute leukemia patients: a comparative, retrospective study of the safety of peripherally inserted vs. centrally inserted central venous catheters. Ann Hematol 95, 2057–2064 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-016-2798-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-016-2798-4

Keywords

Navigation