Skip to main content
Log in

NOTCH1 mutations identify a chronic lymphocytic leukemia patient subset with worse prognosis in the setting of a rituximab-based induction and consolidation treatment

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Hematology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Induction therapy with fludarabine followed by rituximab and consolidation plus maintenance with rituximab improved response duration (RD) and overall survival (OS) in our patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). The aim of our study was to investigate the clinical impact of NOTCH1 mutations in this setting of patients. The study included 123 progressive CLL patients homogeneously assigned to first-line induction treatment with fludarabine followed by rituximab. Fifty-nine patients either in complete remission (CR) minimal residual disease positive (MRD+) after induction (n = 39) or in partial remission (PR, n = 20) underwent consolidation/maintenance therapy with rituximab. Sixteen patients in CR MRD + or PR underwent observation only. The presence of NOTCH1 mutations was investigated by amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS) PCR and by Sanger sequencing. NOTCH1 mutations occurred in 20 out of 123 (16.3 %) cases. Consolidated patients showed longer OS than unconsolidated patients (p = 0.030). Both NOTCH1 mutated and CR MRD+ or PR NOTCH1 mutated patients showed significantly shorter OS after treatment (p = 0.00014 and p = 0.0021, respectively). Moreover, NOTCH1 wild-type consolidated cases experienced significantly longer RD and OS than NOTCH1 mutated consolidated or not consolidated cases (p = 0.00001 and p = 0.018, respectively). Finally, the independent prognostic impact of NOTCH1 mutations for OS was confirmed in multivariate analysis (p < 0.001). The presence of NOTCH1 mutations identifies a CLL subset with worse prognosis in the setting of a rituximab-based induction and consolidation treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Byrd JC, Peterson BL, Morrison VA et al (2003) Randomized phase II study of fludarabine with concurrent versus sequential treatment with rituximab in symptomatic, untreated patients with B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia: results from Cancer and Leukemia Group B 9712 (CALGB 9712). Blood 101:6–14

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Del Poeta G, Del Principe MI, Consalvo MA et al (2005) The addition of rituximab to fludarabine improves clinical outcome in untreated patients with ZAP-70-negative chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Cancer 104:2743–2752

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Keating MJ, O’Brien S, Albitar M et al (2005) Early results of a chemoimmunotherapy regimen of fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab as initial therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia. J Clin Oncol 23:4079–4088

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hallek M, Fischer K, Fingerle-Rowson G, Fink AM et al (2010) Addition of rituximab to fludarabine and cyclophosphamide in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet 376:1164–1174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Böttcher S, Ritgen M, Fischer K, Stilgenbauer S et al (2012) Minimal residual disease quantification is an independent predictor of progression-free and overall survival in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a multivariate analysis from the randomized GCLLSG CLL8 trial. J Clin Oncol 30:980–988

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Del Poeta G, Del Principe MI, Buccisano F et al (2008) Consolidation and maintenance immunotherapy with rituximab improve clinical outcome in patients with B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Cancer 112:119–128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Del Poeta G, Del Principe MI, Bulian P et al (2011) Immunotherapeutic maintenance strategy prolongs response duration and overall survival preventing relapse in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Blood 118:3906a, abstract

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zenz T, Eichhorst B, Busch R et al (2010) TP53 mutation and survival in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. J Clin Oncol 28:4473–4479

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rossi D, Rasi S, Spina V et al (2013) Integrated mutational and cytogenetic analysis identifies new prognostic subgroups in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood 121:1403–1412

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fabbri G, Rasi S, Rossi D, Trifonov V, Khiabanian H, Ma J et al (2011) Analysis of the chronic lymphocytic leukemia coding genome: role of NOTCH1 mutational activation. J Exp Med 208:1389–1401

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Puente XS, Pinyol M, Quesada V, Conde L, Ordonez GR, Villamor N et al (2011) Whole-genome sequencing identifies recurrent mutations in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Nature 475:101–105

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rossi D, Rasi S, Fabbri G, Spina V, Fangazio M, Forconi F et al (2012) Mutations of NOTCH1 are an independent predictor of survival in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood 119:521–529

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Del Poeta G, Dal Bo M, Del Principe MI, Pozzo F, Rossi FM, Zucchetto A et al (2013) Clinical significance of c.7544-7545 delCT NOTCH1 mutation in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Br J Haematol 160:415–418

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Villamor N, Conde L, Martinez-Trillos A et al (2013) NOTCH1 mutations identify a genetic subgroup of chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients with high risk of transformation and poor outcome. Leukemia 27:1100–1106

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mansouri L, Grabowski P, Degerman S et al (2013) Short telomere length is associated with NOTCH1/SF3B1/TP53 aberrations and poor outcome in newly diagnosed chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients. Am J Hematol 88:647–651

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Oscier DG, Rose-Zerilli MJ, Winkelmann N et al (2013) The clinical significance of NOTCH1 and SF3B1 mutations in the UK LRF CLL4 trial. Blood 121:468–475

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Schnaiter A, Paschka P, Rossi M et al (2013) NOTCH1, SF3B1 and TP53 mutations in fludarabine-refractory CLL patients treated with alemtuzumab: results from the CLL2H trial of the GCLLSG. Blood 122:1266–1270

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Stilgenbauer S, Schnaiter A, Paschka P, et al. Gene mutations and treatment outcome in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: results from the CLL8 trial. Blood. 2014 Mar 20. [Epub ahead of print]

  19. Cheson BD, Bennett JM, Grever M et al (1996) National Cancer Institute Sponsored Working Group Guidelines for chronic lymphocytic leukemia: revised guidelines for diagnosis and treatment. Blood 29:4990–4997

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hallek M, Cheson BD, Catovsky D et al (2008) Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a report from the International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia updating the National Cancer Institute-Working Group 1996 guidelines. Blood 111:5446–5456

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Del Poeta G, Maurillo L, Venditti A et al (2001) Clinical significance of CD38 expression in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood 98:2633–2639

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gattei V, Bulian P, Del Principe MI et al (2008) Relevance of CD49d protein expression as overall survival and progressive disease prognosticator in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood 111:865–873

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Del Principe MI, Del Poeta G, Buccisano F et al (2006) Clinical significance of ZAP-70 protein expression in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood 108:853–861

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rossi D, Cerri M, Deambrogi C et al (2009) The prognostic value of TP53 mutations in chronic lymphocytic leukemia is independent of del17p13: implications for overall survival and chemorefractoriness. Clin Cancer Res 15:995–1004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rai KR, Sawitsky A, Cronkite EP et al (1975) Clinical staging of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood 46:219–234

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Cheson BD, Zwiebel J (1998) Chronic lymphocytic leukemia: staging and prognostic factors. Semin Oncol 25:42–59

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Balatti V, Lerner S, Rizzotto L et al (2013) Trisomy 12 CLLs progress through NOTCH1 mutations. Leukemia 27:740–743

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Del Giudice I, Rossi D, Chiaretti S et al (2012) NOTCH1 mutations in +12 chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) confer an unfavorable prognosis, induce a distinctive transcriptional profiling and refine the intermediate prognosis of +12 CLL. Haematologica 97:437–441

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Burger JA (2012) Targeting the microenvironment in chronic lymphocytic leukemia is changing the therapeutic landscape. Curr Opin Oncol 24:643–649

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Zenz T, Gribben JG, Hallek M et al (2012) Risk categories and refractory CLL in the era of chemoimmunotherapy. Blood 119:4101–4107

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Supported in part by Ministero della Salute (Ricerca Finalizzata I.R.C.C.S.), “Alleanza Contro il Cancro”; Rete Nazionale Bio-Informatica Oncologica/RN-BIO; Progetto Giovani Ricercatori no. GR-2010-2317594, no GR-2009-1475467, and no GR-2008-1138053, Ministero della salute, Rome, Italy; Fondazione Internazionale di Ricerca in Medicina Sperimentale (FIRMS); Associazione Italiana contro le Leucemie, linfomi e mielomi (AIL), Venezia Section, Pramaggiore Group, Italy; Ricerca Scientifica Applicata, Regione Friuli Venezia Giulia (“Linfonet” Project), Trieste, Italy; the Associazione Italiana Ricerca Cancro (AIRC), Special Program Molecular Clinical Oncology, 5x1000, no 10007; Investigator Grant IG-13227, and MFAG-10327, Milan, Italy; “5x1000 Intramural Program,” Centro di Riferimento Oncologico, Aviano, Italy.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giovanni Del Poeta.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Table S1

(DOCX 11 kb)

Table S2

(DOCX 11 kb)

Table S3

(DOCX 11 kb)

Table S4

(DOCX 12 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bo, M.D., Del Principe, M., Pozzo, F. et al. NOTCH1 mutations identify a chronic lymphocytic leukemia patient subset with worse prognosis in the setting of a rituximab-based induction and consolidation treatment. Ann Hematol 93, 1765–1774 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-014-2117-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-014-2117-x

Keywords

Navigation