Skip to main content
Log in

Classification of the superior angle of the scapula and its correlation with the suprascapular notch: a study on 303 scapulas

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aims of this study had been to classify the superior angle of the scapula based on morphological features, and to investigate its correlation with the suprascapular notch.

Methods

303 samples of Chinese dried scapular specimens were collected from the Department of anatomy, Southwest Medical University. According to the anatomical morphological characteristics of the superior angle of the scapula, the morphological classification was performed to explore its correlation with the suprascapular notch (SSN).

Results

The superior angle of the scapula was classified into three types (Hilly shape, Mountain Peak shape and Chimney shape). There were 143 cases of Hilly shape (47.20%), 144 cases of Mountain shape (47.52%), and 16 cases of Chimney shape (5.28%). The angle of Hilly shape (93.36° ± 7.76°) was significantly larger than the Mountain Peak shape (86.60° ± 6.61°) and the Chimney shape (86.22° ± 7.20°), and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The type I–III of Rengachary’s classification to SSN was low risk of suprascapular nerve entrapment, while the type IV–VI was high risk of suprascapular nerve entrapment. Compared with the Mountain Peak shape and the Chimney shape, the Hilly shape corresponds to more types I–III of suprascapular notch but to fewer types IV–VI (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

The superior angle of the scapula was divided into three types: Hilly shape (47.20%), Mountain Peak shape (47.52%) and Chimney shape (5.28%). The Mountain Peak shape might be more likely to result in inability of the levator muscle with acute or chronic overload mechanisms, and the risk of suprascapular nerve entrapment in Mountain peak shape was higher than that of Hilly shape. And, it might have a potential effect on neck pain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agrawal D, Singh B, Dixit SG, Ghatak S, Bharadwaj N, Gupta R et al (2015) Morphometry and variations of the human suprascapular notch. Morphologie 99(327):132–140

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bruce J, Dorizas J (2013) Suprascapular nerve entrapment due to a stenotic foramen: a variant of the suprascapular notch. Sports Health 5(4):363–366

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Beger O, Dinç U, Beger B, Uzmansel D, Kurtoğlu Z (2018) Morphometric properties of the levator scapulae, rhomboid major, and rhomboid minor in human fetuses. Surg Radiol Anat 40(4):449–455

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chotai PN, Loukas M, Tubbs RS (2015) Unusual origin of the levator scapulae muscle from mastoid process. Surg Radiol Anat 37(10):1277–1281

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cirpan S, Gocmen-Mas N, Aksu F, Edizer M, Karabekir S, Magden AO (2016) Suprascapular foramen: a rare variation caused by ossified suprascapular ligaments. Folia Morphol (Warsz) 75(1):21–26

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Estwanik JJ (1989) Levator Scapulae Syndrome. Phys Sportsmed 17(10):57–68

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jezierski H, Podgórski M, Stefańczyk L, Kachlik D, Polguj M (2017) The influence of suprascapular notch shape on the visualization of structures in the suprascapular notch region: studies based on a new four-stage ultrasonographic protocol. Biomed Res Int. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/5323628

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Jezierski H, Wysiadecki G, Sibiński M, Borowski A, Podgórski M, Topol M et al (2016) A quantitative study of the arrangement of the suprascapular nerve and vessels in the suprascapular notch region: new findings based on parametric analysis. Folia Morphol (Warsz) 75(4):454–459

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ludig T, Walter F, Chapuis D, Molé D, Roland J, Blum A (2001) MR imaging evaluation of suprascapular nerve entrapment. Eur Radiol 11(11):2161–2169

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Łabętowicz P, Synder M, Wojciechowski M, Orczyk K, Jezierski H, Topol M et al (2017) Protective and predisposing morphological factors in suprascapular nerve entrapment syndrome: a fundamental review based on recent observations. Biomed Res Int. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4659761

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Menachem A, Kaplan O, Dekel S (1993) Levator scapulae syndrome: an anatomic-clinical study. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 53(1):21–24

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Natsis K, Totlis T, Tsikaras P, Appell HJ, Skandalakis P, Koebke J (2007) Proposal for classification of the suprascapular notch: a study on 423 dried scapulas. Clin Anat 20(2):135–139

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Oladipo GS, Aigbogun EO, Akani GL (2015) Angle at the medial border: the spinovertebra angle and its significance. Anat Res Int. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/986029

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Polguj M, Synder M, Kwapisz A, Stefańczyk K, Grzelak P, Podgórski M et al (2015) Clinical evaluation of the shape of the suprascapular notch-an ultrasonographic and computed tomography comparative study: application to shoulder pain syndromes. Clin Anat 28(6):774–779

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Polguj M, Jędrzejewski K, Podgórski M, Topol M (2011) Morphometric study of the suprascapular notch: proposal of classification. Surg Radiol Anat 33(9):781–787

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Polguj M, Jędrzejewski K, Podgórski M, Majos A, Topol M (2013) A proposal for classification of the superior transverse scapular ligament: variable morphology and its potential influence on suprascapular nerve entrapment. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 22(9):1265–1273

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Podgórski M, Topol M, Sibiński M, Domżalski M, Grzelak P, Polguj M (2015) What is the function of the anterior coracoscapular ligament?—a morphological study on the newest potential risk factor for suprascapular nerve entrapment. Ann Anat 201:38–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Piasecki DP, Romeo AA, Bach BR (2009) Suprascapular neuropathy. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 17(11):665–676

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Polguj M, Sibiński M, Grzegorzewski A, Grzelak P, Majos A, Topol M (2013) Variation in morphology of suprascapular notch as a factor of suprascapular nerve entrapment. Int Orthop 37(11):2185–2192

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Rengachary SS, Burr D, Lucas S, Hassanein KM, Mohn MP, Matzke H (1979) Suprascapular entrapment neuropathy: a clinical, anatomical, and comparative study. Part 2: anatomical study. Neurosurgery 5(4):447–451

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rengachary SS, Neff JP, Singer PA, Brackett CE (1979) Suprascapular entrapment neuropathy: a clinical, anatomical, and comparative study. Part 1: clinical study. Neurosurgery 5(4):441–446

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tepeli B, Karataş M, Coşkun M, Yemişçi O (2017) A comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and electroneuromyography for denervated muscle diagnosis. J Clin Neurophysiol 34(3):248–253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tubbs RS, Nechtman C, D’Antoni AV, Shoja MM, Mortazavi MM, Loukas M et al (2013) Ossification of the suprascapular ligament: a risk factor for suprascapular nerve compression? Int J Shoulder Surg 7(1):19–22

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Voisin JL, Ropars M, Thomazeau H (2016) Anatomical evidence for a uniquely positioned suprascapular foramen. Surg Radiol Anat 38(4):489–492

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang HJ, Chen C, Wu LP, Pan CQ, Zhang WJ, Li YK et al (2011) Variable morphology of the suprascapular notch: an investigation and quantitative measurements in Chinese population. Clin Anat 24(1):47–55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by the Academician Workstation in Luzhou (20180101).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

LZ and SJ-F: Conception and design, XG-G: Manuscript writing/editing, YL and MO: Protocol/project development, XY-L: Data analysis, JQ and YX-X: Data collection. GY-W: Provision of materials and literature search.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Guoyou Wang or Shijie Fu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No conflict of interest exists in the submission of this manuscript, and the manuscript was approved by all authors for publication.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval was given by the medical ethics committee of Southwest Medical University with the following reference number: SWMCTCM2017-0701.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, L., Guo, X., Liu, Y. et al. Classification of the superior angle of the scapula and its correlation with the suprascapular notch: a study on 303 scapulas. Surg Radiol Anat 41, 377–383 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-018-2156-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-018-2156-4

Keywords

Navigation