Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The paratendineous tissues: an anatomical study of their role in the pathogenesis of tendinopathy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this paper was to examine the macroscopic and microscopic characteristics of the paratendineous tissues (paratenon, epitenon and endotenon) of the calcaneal tendon to better understand their role in the pathogenesis of “tendinopathy”. Ten non-embalmed legs from cadavers were used. Histological and immunohistochemical studies were done at the middle third of the tendon. Magnetic resonance images of the hind foot were made in 60 living subjects to analyze the morphological alterations of tendon and paratenon. The paratenon is a thick fibrous layer with few elastic fibers, continuous with the crural fascia, well vascularized and innervated. It forms a sheath around the tendon similar to a synovial layer, but less organized. Indeed, it has no complete epithelium, but only some cells producing hyaluronan, called fasciacytes. Crural fascia and paratenon can be clearly observed by MRI, appearing as homogeneous, low signal intensity bands, sharply defined in the context of subcutaneous tissue in T1-weighted sequences. The mean thickness of the crural fascia was 1.11 mm in healthy subjects and 1.30 mm in patients (p < 0.005). The mean value of paratenon thickness in patients was 1.34 mm, 0.85 in healthy (p < 0.0001). The paratenon is more highly vascularized and innervated than the tendon, supporting the hypothesis that it is the origin of pain in tendinopathy. The imaging study suggests that, an increase in the thickness of the paratenon more than 1.35 mm is predictive of paratendinopathy, even before tendon damage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ackermann PW, Li J, Lunderberg T et al (2003) A neuronal plasticity in relation to nociception and healing of rat Achilles tendon. J Orthop Res. 21:432–441. doi:10.1016/S0736-0266(02)00207-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Andersson G, Danielson P, Alfredson H et al (2007) Nerve-related characteristics of ventral paratendinous tissue in chronic Achilles tendinosis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15:1272–1279. doi:10.1007/s00167-007-0364-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Aström M, Gentz CF, Nilsson P et al (1996) Imaging in chronic Achilles tendinopathy: a comparison of ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging and surgical findings in 27 histologically verified cases. Skeletal Radiol 25:615–620

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bjur D, Alfredson H, Forsgren S (2005) The innervation pattern of the human Achilles tendon: studies of the normal and tendinosis tendon with markers for general and sensory innervation. Cell Tissue Res 320:201–206. doi:10.1007/s00441-004-1014-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Calstedt CA (1987) Mechanical and chemical factors in tendon healing. Acta Orthop Scand. 224(Suppl):13–14. doi:10.3109/17453678709154163

    Google Scholar 

  6. Carmont MR, Highland AM, Rochester JR et al (2011) An anatomical study of the fascia cruris and paratatenon of the Achilles tendon. Foot Ankle Surg 17:186–192

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chou WY, Ko JY, Wang FS, Huang CC, Wong T, Wang CJ, Chang HE (2010) Effect of sodium hyaluronate treatment on rotator cuff lesions without complete tears: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 19:557–563. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2009.08.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Buono Del, Chan O, Maffulli N (2013) Achilles tendon: functional anatomy and novel emerging models of imaging classification. Int Orthop 37:715–721. doi:10.1007/s00264-012-1743-y

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Graf J, Schneider U, Niethard FU (1990) Microcirculation of the Achilles tendon and significance of the paratenon. A study with the plastination method (in German). Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 22:163–166

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Halici M, Karaoglu S, Canoz O (2004) Sodium hyaluronate regulating angiogenesis during Achilles tendon healing. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 12:562–567. doi:10.1007/s00167-004-0536-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Harris CA, Peduto AJ (2006) Achille tendon imaging. Australas Radiol 50:513–525. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1673.2006.01622.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jarvinen M, Jozsa L, Kannus P et al (1997) Histopathological findings in chronic tendon disorders. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 7:86–95. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0838.1997.tb00124.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kannus P, Jozsa L (1991) Histopathological changes preceding spontaneous rupture of a tendon. A controlled study of 891 patients. J Bone Joint Surg 73:1507–1525

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Khan KM, Cook JL, Maffulli N, Kannus P (2000) Where is the pain coming from in tendinophaty? It may be biochemical, not only structural, in origin. Br J Sports Med. 34:81–83. doi:10.1136/bjsm.34.2.81

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Khan KM, Cook JL, Kannus P, Maffulli N, Bonar SF (2002) Time to abandon the “tendinitis” myth. BMJ. 324:626–627. doi:10.1136/bmj.324.7338.626

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kurppa K, Waris P, Rokkanen P (1979) Paratendinitis and tenosynovitis. A review. Scand J Work Environ Health Suppl 5:19–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kvist M, Jozsa L, Jarvinen M et al (1985) Fine structural alterations in chronic Achilles paratenonitis in athletes. Path Res Pract 180:416–423

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kvist M, Jozsa L, Jarvinen MJ et al (1987) Chronic Achilles paratenonitis in athletes: a histological and histochemical study. Pathology 19:1–11

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Leung JL, Griffith JF (2008) Sonography of chronic Achilles tendinopathy: a case-control study. J Clin Ultrasound 36:27–32. doi:10.1002/jcu.20388

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mitsui Y, Gotoh M, Nakama K, Yamada T, Higuchi F, Nagata K (2008) Hyaluronic acid inhibits mRNA expression of proinflammatory cytokines and cyclooxygenase-2/prostaglandin E(2) production via CD44 in interleukin-1-stimulated subacromial synovial fibroblasts from patients with rotator cuff disease. J Orthop Res 26:1032–1037. doi:10.1002/jor.20558

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Muneta T, Koga H, Ju YJ, Mochizuki T, Sekiya I (2012) Hyaluronan injection therapy for athletic patients with patellar tendinopathy. J Orthop Sci 17:425–431. doi:10.1007/s00776-012-0225-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Naidu V, Abbassian A, Nielsen D et al (2009) Minimally invasive paratenon release for non-insertional Achilles tendinopathy. Foot Ankle Int 30:680–685. doi:10.3113/FAI.2009.0680

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pierre-Jerome C, Moncayo V, Terk MR (2010) MRI of the Achilles tendon: a comprehensive review of the anatomy, biomechanics, and imaging of overuse tendinopathies. Acta Radiol 51:438–454. doi:10.3109/02841851003627809

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Puddu G, Ippolito E, Postacchini F (1976) A classification of Achilles tendon disease. Am J Sports Med 4:145–150

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sharma P, Maffulli N (2005) Tendon injury and tendinopathy: healing and repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:187–202. doi:10.2106/JBJS.D.01850

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Soila K, Karjalainen P, Aronen HJ et al (1999) High-resolution MR imaging of the asymptomatic Achilles tendon: new observations. Am J Roentgenol 173:323–328. doi:10.2214/ajr.173.2.10430128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Stecco C, Gagey O, Belloni A et al (2007) Anatomy of the deep fascia of the upper limb. Second part: study of innervation. Morphologie 91:38–43

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Stecco C, Stern R, Porzionato A et al (2011) Hyaluronan within fascia in the etiology of myofascial pain. Surg Radiol Anat 33:891–896. doi:10.1007/s00276-011-0876-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Tan SC, Chan O (2008) Achilles and patellar tendinopathy: current understanding of pathophysiology and management. Disabil Rehabil 30:1608–1615. doi:10.1080/09638280701792268

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Van Sterkenburg NM, van Dijk CN (2011) Mid-portion Achilles tendinopathy: why painful? An evidence-based philosophy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthosc 19:1367–1375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Yucesoy CA, Huijing PA (2009) Assessment by finite element modeling indicates that surgical intramuscular aponeurotomy performed closer to the tendon enhances intended acute effects in extramuscularly connected muscle. J Biomech Eng 131:1002–1012. doi:10.1115/1.3005156

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors certify that there is no conflict of interest with any financial organization regarding the material discussed in the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carla Stecco.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stecco, C., Cappellari, A., Macchi, V. et al. The paratendineous tissues: an anatomical study of their role in the pathogenesis of tendinopathy. Surg Radiol Anat 36, 561–572 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-013-1244-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-013-1244-8

Keywords

Navigation