Abstract
Background
Variation in normal anatomy of costal surface of scapula may disrupt smooth scapulothoracic movements and may cause snapping scapula. The aim of this study was to assess variable anatomy of costal surface of scapula and its role in etiopathogenesis of snapping scapula syndrome.
Materials and methods
Superomedial angle, depth of costal surface, forward angulation of root of coracoid process and thickness of superior and inferior angles of 92 dry intact adult scapulae of unknown sex were studied.
Results
Superomedial angle ranged from 124° to 162° (144.34° ± 9.09°). The forward angulation of root of coracoid process ranged from 120° to 160° (141.60° ± 6.53°). Depth of costal surface at the level of root of spine varied widely between 10.5 and 26.7 mm (16.73 ± 3.367 mm). Thickness of superior and inferior angles measured 3.34 ± 0.87 and 6.71 ± 1.18 mm, respectively. Forwardly bent rhinoceros-horn-like projection at the lateral border of scapula was seen in 2.17% of specimens.
Conclusion
Variation in anatomy of costal surface of scapula observed in this study may be clinically significant with respect to snapping scapula syndrome.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boinet M (1867) Bull Soc de Chir 8:458: quoted by Milch H, Burman MS (1933) Snapping scapula and humerus varus. Report of six cases. Arch Surg 26:570–588
Carlson HL, Haig AJ, Stewart DC (1997) Snapping scapula syndrome: three case reports and an analysis of the literature. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 78:506–511
Ebraheim NA, Rongming X, Haman SP, Miedler JD, Yeasting RA (2000) Quantitative anatomy of the scapula. Am J Orthop 29:287–292
Edelson JG (1996) Variations in the anatomy of the scapula with reference to the snapping scapula. Clin Orthop Relat Res 322:111–115
Lazar MA, Kwon YW, Rokito AS (2009) Snapping scapula syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 91:2251–2262
Lehtinen JT, Tingart MJ, Apreleva M, Warner JP (2005) Quantitative morphology of the scapula: normal variations of the superomedial scapular angle and superior and inferior pole thickness. Orthopedics 28(5):481–486
Manske RC, Reiman MP, Stovak ML (2004) Nonoperative and operative management of snapping scapula. Am J Sports Med 32(6):1554–1565
Milch H, Burman MS (1933) Snapping scapula and humerus varus. Report of six cases. Arch Surg 26:570–588
Mozes G, Bickels J, Ovadia D, Dekel S (1999) The use of three-dimensional computed tomography in evaluating snapping scapula syndrome. Orthopedics 22:1029–1033
Oizumi N, Suenaga N, Minami A (2004) Snapping scapula caused by abnormal angulation of the superior angle of the scapula. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 13:115–118
Percy EC, Birbrager D, Pitt MJ (1988) Snapping scapula: a review of the literature and presentation of 14 patients. Can J Surg 31:248–250
Wood VE, Verska JM (1989) The snapping scapula in association with the thoracic outlet syndrome. Arch Surg 124:1335–1337
Acknowledgment
The authors wish to express sincere gratitude to the Department of Anatomy, Gian Sagar Medical College, Banur, for examining their collection of bones.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aggarwal, A., Wahee, P., Harjeet et al. Variable osseous anatomy of costal surface of scapula and its implications in relation to snapping scapula syndrome. Surg Radiol Anat 33, 135–140 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-010-0723-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-010-0723-4