Skip to main content
Log in

Is the high submandibular transmasseteric approach to the mandibular condyle safe for the inferior buccal branch?

  • Anatomic Bases of Medical, Radiological and Surgical Techniques
  • Published:
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

There are basically 3 main approaches for extra-articular mandibular condyle fractures: low cervical, retromandibular and preauricular. These include a risk of facial palsy affecting the marginal mandibular branch. We use a high submandibular transmasseteric approach featuring masseter section 10–20 mm above the mandibular basilar edge. Our null hypothesis was that both the marginal mandibular and the inferior buccal branches are not more at risk than in other surgical approaches.

Methods

This study was based on 20 parotidomasseteric dissections from 10 embalmed cadaveric heads. We used as reference the vertical line, passing through the mandibular angle, parallel to the preauricular line. We performed measurements of the marginal mandibular and inferior buccal branches’ heights.

Results

The inferior buccal branch had an average height of 16.8 mm and the highest standard deviation (7.2). Extremes were, respectively, 32 and 7 mm. The marginal mandibular branch had an average height of 3.2 mm with standard deviation equal to 3.0. Extremes were, respectively, 9 and −3 mm.

Conclusion

The high submandibular transmasseteric approach provides great exposure of facial nerve branches lying on the masseter muscle, if even encountered. Through masseteric incision performed between 10 and 20 mm above the basilar edge of the mandible, the marginal mandibular branch is safe from wound with an added safety margin of 4 mm. The surgeon using this approach is most likely to encounter the inferior buccal branch. It can then be avoided under visual control. This makes it a swift and safe approach to the mandibular condyle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bellocq Ph (1925) Anatomie médico-chirurgicale Région profonde de la face. Masson et Cie ed Paris, France, fascicule I, pp 171, 198–199

  2. Bouchet A, Cuilleret J (1991) Anatomie topographique, descriptive et fonctionelle Masson ed Paris, France 2è ed Tome 1, Le système nerveux central, la face, la tête et les organes des sens, pp 467–468

  3. Choi BH, Yoo JH (1999) Open reduction of condylar neck fractures with exposure of the facial nerve. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 88(3):292–296

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ellis E, Zide M (2006) Surgical approaches to the facial skeleton. In: Transfacial approaches to the mandible, 2nd edn. Lippincott Wiliams & Wilkins ed, Philadelphia, pp 152–212

  5. Ellis E, McFadden D, Simon P, Throckmorton G (2000) Surgical complications with open treatment of mandibular condylar process fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 58:950–958

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fontaine C (1996) In: Anatomie clinique: Tête et cou, Chevrel JP, Fontaine C Springer-Verlag ed, Paris, France, Le Nerf facial, pp 65–74

  7. Kamina P (1996) Anatomie: Introduction à la clinique. Maloine ed Paris, France, tome 2, Tête et cou, nerfs crâniens et organes des sens, pp 56–65

  8. Kwak HH, Park HD, Youn KH, Hu KS, Koh KS, Han SH, Kim HJ (2004) Branching patterns of the facial nerve and its communication with the auriculotemporal nerve. Surg Radiol Anat 26(6):494–500

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Maillot C, Kahn JL (2004) Tête et cou, Anatomie topographique Springer-Verlag ed Paris, France Région superficielle de la face, pp 16–17

  10. Manisali M, Amin M, Aghabeigi B, Newman L (2003) Retromandibular approach to the mandibular condyle: a clinical and cadaveric study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 32:253–256

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Meyer C, Zink S, Chatelain B, Wilk A (2008) Clinical experience with osteosynthesis of subcondylar fractures of the mandible using TCP plates. J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg 36:260–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Meyer C, Zink S, Wilk A (2006) La voie d’abord sous-angulo-mandibulaire haute (voie de Risdon modifiée) pour le traitement des fractures sous-condyliennes de la mandibule. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac 107:449–454

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Meyer C, Trost O, Wilk A (2005) Notre expérience du traitement chirurgical des fractures de la région condylienne. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac 106(Suppl 4):1S55–1S57

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pather N, Osman M (2006) Landmarks of the facial nerve: implications for parotidectomy. Surg Radiol Anat 28:170–175

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Poirier P, Charpy A, Traité d’Anatomie Humaine (1904), Masson et Cie ed Paris France, 2è ed, Tome 3ème Système nerveux: les nerfs, pp 729–737

  16. Potgieter W, Meiring JH, Boon JM, Pretorius E, Pretorius JP, Becker PJ (2005) Mandibular landmarks as an aid in minimizing injury to the marginal mandibular branch: a metric and geometric anatomical study. Clin Anat 18:171–178

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Risdon F (1934) Ankylosis of the temporomandibular joint. J Am Dent Assoc 21:1933–1937

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rouviere H, Delmas A (1967) Anatomie Humaine descriptive topographique, et fonctionelle Masson et Cie ed Paris, France tome I, Tête et du cou, pp 277–279

  19. Savary V, Robert R, Rogez JM, Armstrong O, Leborgne J (1997) The mandibular marginal ramus of the facial nerve: an anatomic and clinical study. Surg Radiol Anat 19(2):69–72

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Saylam C, Ucerler H, Orhan M, Ozek C (2006) Anatomic landmarks of the buccal branches of the facial nerve. Surg Radiol Anat 28(5):462–467

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Testut L, Latarjet A (1949) Traité d’Anatomie Humaine In: Chevrel JP, Fontaine CG (eds). Doin & Cie ed Paris, France tome 4ème, Appareil de la digestion, pp 552–554

  22. Touré S, Vacher C, J-Ch Bertrand (2004) Etude anatomique du rameau marginal de la mandibule du nerf facial. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac 105(3):149–152

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Trost O, El-Naaj IA, Trouilloud P, Danino A, Malka G (2008) Transmasseteric anteroparotid approach in condylar fracture. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 66:201–204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wilk A (2009) High perimandular approach. In: Kleinheinz J, Meyer C (eds) Fractures of the mandibular condyle. Quintessence Verlag, United Kingdom, pp 143–154

  25. Wilson AW, Ethunandan M, Brennan PA (2005) Transmasseteric antero-parotid approach for open reduction and internal fixation of condylar fractures. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 43(1):57–60

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-Christophe Lutz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lutz, JC., Clavert, P., Wolfram-Gabel, R. et al. Is the high submandibular transmasseteric approach to the mandibular condyle safe for the inferior buccal branch?. Surg Radiol Anat 32, 963–969 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-010-0663-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-010-0663-z

Keywords

Navigation