Abstract
Background
Sacral approach to epidural space produces reliable and effective block of sacral nerves. It is necessary to have a detailed knowledge of sacral hiatus (SH) for optimal access into sacral epidural space. This study was undertaken to evaluate various landmarks of SH.
Methods
One hundred and fourteen adult dry human sacral bones were examined for morphometric analysis using vernier caliper. SH was categorized on the basis of shape.
Results
Most commonly encountered shape of hiatus was inverted U (40.35%). Its apex and base were most commonly observed against fourth and fifth sacral vertebrae, respectively. Various defects in dorsal wall of sacral canal were recorded. Height and anteroposterior depth at the apex of hiatus were ranged 4.30–38.60 and 1.90–10.40 mm, respectively. Mean intercornual distance at base was 11.95 ± 2.78 mm. The triangle formed by right and left posterior superior iliac spines and apex of SH was found equilateral in 45% cases only. Sacral cornua were marked by their bilateral presence in 55.26% and impalpable in 21.05% cases. Minimum distance between S2 and apex was 7.25 mm which suggested that it would not be safe to push the needle beyond 7 mm into sacral canal so as to avoid dural puncture. In 8.77% cases, depth of hiatus was less than 3 mm.
Conclusions
Single bony landmark may not help in locating SH because of anatomical variations. Depth of hiatus less than 3 mm may be one of the causes for failure of needle insertion. Surrounding bony irregularities, different shapes of hiatus and defects in dorsal wall of sacral canal should be taken into consideration before undertaking caudal epidural block so as to avoid its failure.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Black MG (1949) Anatomic reasons for caudal anesthesia failure. Anesth Analg 28:33–39
Bush K, Hillier S (1991) A controlled study of caudal epidural injections of triamcinolone plus procaine for the management of intractable sciatica. Spine 16:572–575
Chen PC, Tang SFT, Hsu TC et al (2004) Ultrasound guidance in caudal epidural needle placement. Anaesthesiology 101:181–184
Cuckler JM, Bernini PA, Wiesel SW (1985) The use of epidural steroids in the treatment of radicular pain. J Bone Joint Surg Am 67:63–66
Lanier VS, McKnight HE, Trotter M (1944) Caudal analgesia: an experimental and anatomical study. Am J Obstet Gynaec 47(5):633–641
Martin LVH (1994) Sacral epidural (caudal) block. In: Wildsmith JAW, Armitage EN (eds) Principles and practice of regional anaesthesia. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp 127–134
Nagar SK (2004) A study of sacral hiatus in dry human sacra. J Anat Soc India 53(2):18–21
Sekiguchi M, Yabuki S, Satoh K, Kikuchi S (2004) An anatomic study of the sacral hiatus: a basis for successful caudal epidural block. Clin J Pain 20:51–54
Senoglu N, Senoglu M, Oksuz H et al (2005) Landmarks of the Sacral hiatus for caudal epidural block: an anatomical study. Br J Anaes 95(5):692–695
Trotter M (1947) Variations of sacral canal: their significance in the administration of caudal analgesia. Anesth Analg 26(5):192–202
Williams A, Newell RLM, Collins P (2005) Back and macroscopic anatomy of spinal cord. In: Standring S (ed) Gray’s anatomy: the anatomical basis of clinical practice, 39th edn. Elsevier, Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp 725–773
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aggarwal, A., Aggarwal, A., Harjeet et al. Morphometry of sacral hiatus and its clinical relevance in caudal epidural block. Surg Radiol Anat 31, 793–800 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-009-0529-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-009-0529-4