Skip to main content
Log in

Normal glenoid rim anatomy and the reliability of shoulder instability measurements based on intrasite correlation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the glenoid shape and to evaluate if the contralateral glenoid can be used as size reference.

Methods

Two independent investigators prospectively analysed shoulder computer-tomographies of 90 patients. The glenoids were positioned in a true “en face” view and evaluated for size and shape. The intraindividual correlation of these parameters between left and right side were assessed.

Results

In the 90 computer tomographically evaluated shoulder pairs a significant intraindividual correlation of size and shape was seen (P < 0.001). The intraindividual difference in glenoid surface area averaged 1.8% of the total glenoid surface. The shape of the inferior hemisphere correlated 100%. We found all the inferior glenoids to be circular.

Conclusion

Our study clearly shows that the inferior glenoid in healthy individuals has the shape of a circle. The high side-to-side correlation of the glenoid surface area can be applied when measuring bony defects by evaluation of the contralateral side.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aigner F, Longato S, Fritsch H et al (2004) Anatomical considerations regarding the “bare spot” of the glenoid cavity. Surg Radiol Anat 26:308–311

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Burkhart S, Debeer J, Tehrany A et al (2002) Quantifying glenoid bone loss arthroscopically in shoulder instability. Arthroscopy 18:488–491

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Churchill R, Brems J, Kotschi H (2001) Glenoid size, inclination, and version: an anatomic study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 10:327–332

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. De Wilde L, Berghs B, Audenaert E et al (2004) About the variability of the shape of the glenoid cavity. Surg Radiol Anat 26:54–59

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Huber C (1991) The form and size of the glenoid cavity. Anat Anz 2:137–142

    Google Scholar 

  6. Huysmans P, Haen P, Kidd M et al (2006) The shape of the inferior part of the glenoid: a cadaveric study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 15:759–763

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Itoi E, Lee S, Berglund L et al (2000) The effect of a glenoid defect on anteroinferior stability of the shoulder after Bankart repair: a cadaveric study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82:35–46

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Prescher A (2000) Anatomical basics, variations, and degenerative changes of the shoulder joint and shoulder girdle. Eur J Radiol 35:88–102

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sugaya H, Moriishi J, Dohi M et al (2003) Glenoid rim morphology in recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85:878–884

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hans-Christian Jeske.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jeske, HC., Oberthaler, M., Klingensmith, M. et al. Normal glenoid rim anatomy and the reliability of shoulder instability measurements based on intrasite correlation. Surg Radiol Anat 31, 623–625 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-009-0492-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-009-0492-0

Keywords

Navigation