Skip to main content
Log in

The “muscular hernia sign”: an original ultrasonographic sign to detect lesions of the forearm’s interosseous membrane

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The total disruption of the forearm’s interosseous membrane can lead to an Essex-Lopresti syndrome. The diagnosis must be done early for a better prognostic. Incomplete lesions can aggravate and an early diagnosis of incomplete lesions is a challenging problem. Magnetic resonance imaging is the gold standard but remains expensive, and is hard to obtain in an emergency. On the contrary, ultrasonography is cheap, accessible in an emergency, and dynamical tests can be performed easily. Twelve fresh frozen forearms were randomized in four groups. The membrane was divided into three parts (proximal, middle, and distal thirds). Each group was prepared with variable patterns of lesions. Two radiologists performed an ultrasonographic (US) examination of these forearms. They were blinded with respect to the lesional status of the forearms. Each examination consisted of two stages: static and dynamic. During the dynamic examination, the radiologist looked for the “muscular hernia sign”. The results of their examinations were compared with the real lesional status. The static examination was very efficient in the proximal and middle parts of the membrane, and less reliable in the distal third. With the dynamical examination, no mistake occurred at the proximal and middle parts of the forearm, and there was only one at the distal part. The US examination of the interosseous membrane is very efficient to detect incomplete lesions, mostly, if dynamical tests are performed looking for a “muscular hernia sign”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Broberg MA, Morrey BF (1986) Results of delayed excision of the radial head after fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am 65:669–674

    Google Scholar 

  2. Curr JF, Coe WA (1946) Dislocation of the inferior radioulnar joint. Br J Surg 34:74–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Duparc F, Tobenas AC, Dujardin F, Thomine JM (1999) Fractures de la tête radiale: données anatomiques et biomécaniques. In: Duparc F, Katz D (eds) Fractures de la tête radiale. Monographies du GEEC. Sauramps medical, Montpellier, pp 15–27

    Google Scholar 

  4. Essex-Lopresti P (1951) Fractures of the radial head with distal radio-ulnar dislocation: report of two cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 33:244–247

    Google Scholar 

  5. Failla JM, Jacobson J, van Holsbeeck M (1999) Ultrasound diagnosis and surgical pathology of the torn interosseous membrane in forearm fractures/dislocations. J Hand Surg Am 24:257–266

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fester EW, Murray PM, Sanders TG, Ingari JV, Leyendecker J, Leis HL (2002) The efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound in detecting disruptions of the forearm interosseous membrane: a cadaver study. J Hand Surg Am 27:418–424

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Geel CW, Palmer AK (1992) Radial head fractures and their effect on the distal radioulnar joint. A rationale for treatment. Clin Orthop 275:79–84

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Goldberg I, Peylan J, Yosipovitch Z (1986) Late results of excision of the radial head for an isolated closed fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am 68:675–679

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hotchkiss RN, An KN, Sowa DT, Basta S, Weiland AJ (1989) An anatomic and mechanical study of the interosseous membrane of the forearm: pathomechanics of proximal migration of the radius. J Hand Surg Am 14:256–261

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jaakkola JI, Riggans DH, Lourie GM (2001) Ultrasonography for the evaluation of forearm interosseous membrane disruption in a cadaver model. J Hand Surg Am 26:1053–1057

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Nakamura T, Yabe Y, Horiuchi Y, Yamazaki N (1999) Three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging of the interosseous membrane of forearm: a new method using fuzzy reasoning. Magn Reson Imaging 17:463–470

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Smith AM, Urbanosky LR, Castle JA, Rushing JT, Ruch DS (2002) Radius pull test: predictor of longitudinal forearm instability. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84:1970–1976

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Soubeyrand M, Oberlin C, Dumontier C, Belkheyar Z, Lafont C, Degeorges R (2006) Ligamentoplasty of the forearm’s interosseous membrane using the semitendinous tendon: anatomical study and surgical procedure. Surg Radiol Anat. DOI 10.1007/s00276-006-0086-z

  14. Sowa DT, Hotchkiss RN, Weiland AJ (1995) Symptomatic proximal translation of the radius following radial head resection. Clin Orthop 317:106–113

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Starch DW, Dabezies EJ (2001) Magnetic resonance imaging of the interosseous membrane of the forearm. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83:235–238

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wallace AL, Walsh WR, van Rooijen M, Hughes JS, Sonnabend DH (1997) The interosseous membrane in radio-ulnar dissociation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 79B:422–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Renaud Degeorges.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Soubeyrand, M., Lafont, C., Oberlin, C. et al. The “muscular hernia sign”: an original ultrasonographic sign to detect lesions of the forearm’s interosseous membrane. Surg Radiol Anat 28, 372–378 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-006-0100-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-006-0100-5

Keywords

Navigation