Skip to main content
Log in

Anatomical and biomechanical investigations of the iliotibial tract

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Divergent descriptions of the anatomic location and biomechanical function of the iliotibial tract (IT) can be found in the literature. This study attempted to obtain exact data regarding the anatomic course and material characteristics including the biomechanical properties of this structure. The following were its aims: (1) anatomical investigations of the IT; (2) mechanical properties of the IT; (3) femoral head centralizing force of the IT and subligamentous forces in the height of the greater trochanter in different joint positions by using a custom-made measuring prosthesis and a subligamentous positioned sensor; (4) construction of a finite element model of the proximal femur including the IT and measuring the femoral neck angle under variation. The hip joints and IT in a total of 18 unfixed corpses were evaluated. We studied the anatomic relationship to surrounding structures, as well as the material properties with the help of tensile strength testing utilizing an uniaxial apparatus. During the test, a load-displacement curve was registered, documenting the maximum load and deformation of the IT. To measure the subligamentous pressure at the height of the greater trochanter, a custom-made sensor with a power-recording instrument was constructed. Furthermore, an altered hip prosthesis with a pressure gauge at the height of the femoral neck was used to measure the forces which are directed at the acetabulum. The investigations were done in neutral-0 position and ab/adduction of the hip joint of the unfixed corpse. In addition, we varied the femoral neck angle between 115° and 155° in 5° steps. To confirm the subligamentous forces, we did the same measurements intraoperatively at the height of the greater trochanter before and after hip joint replacement in 12 patients. We constructed a finite element model of the proximal femur and considering the IT. The acquisition of the data was done at physiological (128°), varus (115°), and valgus (155°) femoral neck angles. The influencing forces of the IT at the height of the greater trochanter and the forces at the femoral head or the acetabulum could be measured. Our anatomical investigations revealed a splitting of the IT into a superficial and a deep portion, which covers the tensor fasciae latae. The tensor fasciae latae has an insertion on the IT. The IT continues down the femur, passing over the greater trochanter without developing an actual fixation to the bone. Part of the insertion of the gluteus maximus radiates into the IT. The IT passes over the vastus lateralis and inserts at the infracondylar tubercle of the tibia or Gerdy’s tubercle, at the head of the fibula, as well as at the lateral intermuscular septum. Portions also insert on the transverse and longitudinal retinaculum of the patella. Concerning the material properties of the IT, we found a structural stiffness of 17 N/mm extension on average (D=17 N/mm). The subligamentous measurements at the height of the greater trochanter in the unfixed corpse and intraoperatively during hip joint replacement showed an increase of the forces during adduction and a decrease during abduction of the hip joint. We found thereby a maximum increase up to 106 N with 40° adduction. Concerning the femoral neck angle, we can state that valgus leads to lower subligamentous forces and varus to higher subligamentous forces. The forces directed at the acetabulum, which were measured by the prosthesis with a sensor along the femoral neck, showed a decrease with varus angles and an increase with valgus angles. The highest force of 624 N was measured with 40° adduction and an angle of 155°. The finite element model of the proximal femur showed a sole hip joint-centralizing force of the IT of 655 N with a femoral neck angle of 128° after subtraction of the gluteal muscle force and the body weight. At 115°, we found an increase up to 997 N and a decrease to 438 N at 155°. Concerning the resulting forces in the acetabulum, we found opposite forces in comparison with the force of the IT at the height of the greater trochanter: at 115°, a femoral head-centralizing force of 1601 N; at 128°, 2360 N; and at 155°, 2422 N. By our investigations, we can approximately prove the hip joint-centralizing force of the IT. By variation of the femoral neck angle and the position of the hip joint, we can predict the subligamentous force of the IT and the resulting force at the femoral head or at the acetabulum. The intraoperative measurement of the subligamentous forces of the IT is a good monitoring mechanism for the persistent hip-centralizing function of the IT in the course of hip joint replacement. The surgeon has the opportunity to check the stability of the hip joint after replacement. The finite element model gives the opportunity to check the divergent relative strength by variation of the femoral neck angle and the tension of the IT. In this way, the changes in the forces induced by a displacement osteotomy could be estimated preoperatively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amtmann E, Kummer B (1968) The strain of the human hip joint. II. Extent and direction of the hip joint resultant in the coronal plane. Z Anat 127:286–298

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Beaupré GS, Orr TE, Carter DR (1990) An approach for time-dependent bone remodeling and remodeling-application: a preliminary remodeling simulation. J Orthop Res 8:662–670

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Benninghoff A (1985) Anatomy. Macroscopic and microscopic anatomy of the human, Vol I, 14th edn. Urban & Schwarzenberg, Munich

  4. Bergmann G, Graichen F, Rohlmann A (1993) Hip joint loading during walking and running measured in two patients. J Biomech 26:969–990

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bergmann G, Deuretzbacher G, Heller M, Graichen F, Rohlmann A, Strauss J, Duda GN (2001) Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. J Biomech 34:859–871

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Brinkmann P, Hoefert H, Jongen JT, Polster J (1974) The biomechanics of the hip joint. Orthopäde 3:104–110

    Google Scholar 

  7. Debrunner HW (1975) Studies about the biomechanics of the hip joint. Z Orthop 113:377–388

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Föppl L, Mönch E (1972) Practical tension optics, 3rd edn. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

  9. Frick H, Leonhardt H, Starck D (1987) General and special anatomy. Textbook of the complete anatomy, Vol I, 3rd edn. Thieme, Stuttgart

  10. Gray H (1980) In: Williams PL, Warwick R (eds) Gray’s anatomy. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh

  11. Hamacher P, Roesler H (1974) Stress graphs at hip joint diseases. Z Orthop 112:176–186

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Huggler AH, Jacob HAC (1983) To the functional relevance of the iliotibial tract. Z Orthop 121:44–46

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Inman VT (1947) Functional aspects of the abductor muscles of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 29:607–619

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kaplan EB (1958) The iliotibial tract. Clinical and morphological significance. J Bone Joint Surg Am 52:817–832

    Google Scholar 

  15. Knief JJ (1967) Quantitative investigations about the distribution of hard substances in bone and their relationship to local mechanical load. Methodics and biomechanical problems, presented at the example of the coxal end of the femur. Z Anat 126:55–80

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kummer B (1993) Is the Pauwels’ theory of hip biomechanics still valid? A critical analysis, based on modern methods. Ann Anat 175:203–210

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lanz T, Wachsmuth W (1972) Practical anatomy, Vol I, Part 4, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

  18. Lobenhoffer P, Gerich T, Lattermann C (1994) The distal femoral fixation of the iliotibial tract. Sportverl Sportschad 8:2–15

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Manouvrier ML (1904) Les fonctions du muscle du fascia lata. Mem Soc Biol 56:510–513

    Google Scholar 

  20. Müller W (1982) The knee. Form, function and ligamentary reconstruction surgery. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

  21. Noyes FR, Butler DL, Grood ES (1984) Biomechanical analysis of human ligament grafts used in knee ligament repair and reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am 66:344–352

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Olofsson H (1976) Three-dimensional FEM-calculation of elastic stress field in human femur. Doctoral dissertation, Uppsala University

  23. Pauwels F (1948) Bedeutung und kausale Erklärung der Spongiosaarchitektur in neuer Auffassung. Ärztl Wschr 3:379

  24. Pauwels F (1950) Die Bedeutung der Bauprinzipien des Stütz- und Bewegungsapparates für die Beanspruchung der Röhrenknochen. Z Anat Entw Gesch 114:525–538

    Google Scholar 

  25. Pauwels F (1958) The functional adaptation of bone through growth in length. Verh Dtsch Orthop Ges 45:34–56

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rohlmann A, Bergmann G, Kölbel R (1981) The load of the femur. II. Influence of the iliotibial tract. Z Orthop 119:163–166

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Rydell NW (1966) Forces acting on the femoral head-prosthesis. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 88

  28. Terry GC, Hughston JC, Norwood LA (1986) The anatomy of the iliotibial band and tract. Am J Sports Med 14:39–45

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Tichy P, Tillmann B (1989) The tension band wiring effect of the iliotibial tract. Unfallchirurg 92:240–244

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Valliappan S, Svensson NL, Wood RD (1977) Three-dimensional stress analysis of the human femur. Comput Biol Med 7:253–257

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wirtz DC, Pandorf T, Radermacher K (1998) Conception and realization of a physiologic, anisotropic finite element model of the proximal femur. Z Orthop 136:A121–A122

    Google Scholar 

  32. Witte H, Eckstein F, Recknagel S (1997) A calculation of the forces acting on the human acetabulum during walking. Based on in vivo force measurements, kinematic analysis and morphometry. Acta Anat 160:269–280

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Wood RD (1975) Stress analysis of the femur. Thesis, University of New South Wales, Australia

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Birnbaum.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Birnbaum, K., Siebert, C.H., Pandorf, T. et al. Anatomical and biomechanical investigations of the iliotibial tract. Surg Radiol Anat 26, 433–446 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-004-0265-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-004-0265-8

Keywords

Navigation