Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Videodefecography: a study of the rectal motile pattern

  • Radiologic Anatomy
  • Published:
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The mechanism of rectal motility has remained largely obscure. Recently, by recording rectal electromechanical activity, we identified the rectal motility pattern as occurring in a "mass squeeze" manner. In the current communication, rectal motility was studied by means of videodefecography. The study comprised 28 healthy volunteers (18 men, 10 women; mean age 37.6±11.8 years). Evacuation dynamics were studied and registered using a videocassette tape with a high-resolution recorder. The rectum showed no peristaltic or segmentation activity at rest. When the subject was asked to evacuate, a contraction wave started at the rectosigmoid junction (RSJ) and spread aborally. The upper rectum appeared to contract producing anal canal opening and the closure of the RSJ; after rectal evacuation, the anal canal closed and the RSJ opened. The rectal contraction wave was repeated as long as the rectum still contained barium paste. The subjects strained prior to the start of each contraction wave. Some waves did not effect rectal evacuation. These "incomplete" waves started at the mid- or lower rectum and were followed by "complete" waves that produced evacuation. In five of 28 subjects, rectal intussusception occurred during rectal contraction. A small anterior rectocele occurred in another two subjects during rectal contraction. Videodefecography revealed that upon rectal distension with barium paste, a contraction wave, initiated at the RSJ, effected reflex RSJ closure and anal canal opening. The wave spread aborally, "squeezing" the rectal contents towards the opened anal canal. Two types of contraction waves were observed: "complete" which produced rectal evacuation, and "incomplete" which failed to effect evacuation. Physiologic intussusception or rectocele were seen in a few subjects.

Résumé

Le mécanisme de la motilité rectale est resté largement obscur. Récemment, en enregistrant l'activité électro-mécanique du rectum, nous avons identifié la configuration de la motilité rectale telle qu'elle survenait lors d'une compression en masse. Dans le présent travail, la motilité rectale a été étudiée au moyen de la vidéodéfécographie. L'étude a intéressé 28 volontaires sains (18 hommes et 10 femmes, âgés en moyenne de 37,6±11,8 ans). Les courbes dynamiques d'évacuation ont été étudiées et enregistrées en utilisant des vidéocassettes avec un enregistreur à haute résolution. Le rectum ne présentait au repos aucune activité péristaltique ou de segmentation. Quand on demandait au sujet d'évacuer, une onde de contraction débutait à la jonction recto-sigmoïdienne et diffusait caudalement. La partie supérieure du rectum semblait se contracter, produisant une ouverture du canal anal et une fermeture de la jonction recto-sigmoïdienne; après évacuation rectale, le canal anal se fermait et la jonction recto-sigmoïdienne s'ouvrait. L'onde de contraction rectale se répétait aussi longtemps que le rectum contenait encore de la pâte barytée. Les sujets forçaient avant le début de chaque vague de contraction. Quelques vagues n'entraînaient pas d'évacuation rectale. Ces vagues "incomplètes" commençaient à la partie moyenne ou basse du rectum et étaient suivies par des vagues complètes qui produisaient réellement l'évacuation. Sur 5 sujets sur 28, une invagination survenait au cours de la contraction rectale. Une petite rectocèle antérieure survenait chez deux autres sujets au cours de la contraction rectale. La vidéodéfécographie a montré que, sous distension rectale par une pâte barytée, une onde de contraction, née à la jonction recto-sigmoïdienne, entraînait une fermeture réflexe de la jonction recto-sigmoïdienne et une ouverture du canal anal. La vague diffusait en direction caudale, poussant le contenu rectal vers le canal anal ouvert. Deux types d'ondes de contraction ont été observés: complètes, produisant une évacuation rectale, et incomplètes, qui ne parvenaient pas à obtenir une évacuation. Une invagination physiologique ou une rectocèle ont été vues chez quelques sujets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bannister JJ, Read NW, Donnely TC, Sun WM (1989) External and internal anal sphincter responses to rectal distension in normal subjects and in patients with idiopathic fecal incontinence. Br J Surg 76: 617–621

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bouchoucha M, Jais JP, Arhan P, Faverdin CL, Pellerin DF (1994) Variation of the rheological properties of the human rectal wall with distending volume. Clin Invest Med 17: 107–114

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Dall FH, Jorgensen CS, Houe D, Gregersen H, Djurhuns JD (1993) Biomechanical wall properties of the human rectum. A study with impedance planimetry. Gut 34: 1581–1586

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Felt Bersma RJ, Gort G, Meurissen SG (1991) Normal values in anal manometry and rectal sensation: a problem of range. Hepatogastroenterology 38: 444–449

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Goyal RK, Hirand J (1996) The enteric nervous system. N Engl J Med 334: 1106–1115

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kellow JE (1996) Gastrointestinal motility and defecation. In: Greger R, Windhorst U (eds) Comprehensive human physiology, from cellular mechanisms to integration. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 1289–1308

  7. Kumar D, Wingate DL (1985) Colorectal motility. In: Henry M, Swash M (eds) Coloproctology and the pelvic floor. Pathophysiology and management. Butterworth, Boston, pp 47–61

  8. Madoff RD, Orsom WJ, Rothenberger DA, Goldberg SM (1990) Rectal compliance: a critical reappraisal. Int J Colorectal Dis 5: 37–40

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mahieu P, Pringor J, Podart P (1984) Defecography. I. Description of a new procedure and results in normal patients. Gastrointest Radiol 9: 247–251

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pedersen E, Harving H, Klemar B, Torring J (1978) Human anal reflexes. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 44: 813–818

    Google Scholar 

  11. Proano M, Camilleri M, Phillips SF, Brown ML, Thomforde GM (1990) Transit of solids through the human colon: regional quantitation in the unprepared bowel. Am J Physiol 258: G856–G862

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rasmussen O, Christiansen B, Sorensen M, Tetzschner T, Christiansen J (1990) Rectal compliance in the assessment of patients with fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 33: 650–653

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sarna SK (1991) Physiology and pathophysiology of colonic motor activity. Dig Dis Sci 36: 998–1018

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Schemann M, Ehrlein HJ (1986) Postprandial patterns of canine jejunal motility and transit of luminal contents. Gastroenterology 90: 991–1000

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Schouten WR, Gosselink MJ, Boerma MO, Ginai AK (1998) Rectal wall contractility in response to an evoked urge to defecate in patients with obstructed defecation. Dis Colon Rectum 41: 473–479

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Shafik A (1991) Straining-levator reflex: the description of a new reflex and its clinical significance. Coloproctology 13: 314–319

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shafik A (1995) Electrorectography in chronic constipation. World J Surg 19: 772–775

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Shafik A (1996) Sigmoidorectal junction reflex: role in the defecation mechanism. Clin Anat 9: 391–394

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Shafik A (2001) Rectal inhibition by inferior rectal nerve stimulation in dogs. Recognition of a new reflex: the voluntary anorectal inhibition reflex. Eur J Gastroent Hepatol 13: 413–418

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Shafik A, Ali YA, Afifi R (1997) Is the rectum a conduit or storage organ? Int Surg 82: 194–197

    Google Scholar 

  21. Shafik A, El-Sharkawy A, Sharaf WM (1997) Direct measurement of intra-abdominal pressure in various conditions. Eur J Surg 163: 883–887

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Shafik A, El-Sibai O (2000) Rectal pacing: pacing parameters required for rectal evacuation of normal and constipated subjects. J Surg Res 88: 181–185

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Shafik A, El-Sibai O, Mostafa RM, Shafik I (2002) Study of the mechanism of rectal motility: the "mass squeeze contraction". Arch Physiol Biochem 109: 418–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Shafik A, El-Sibai O, Shafik AA (2000) Rectal pacing in patients with constipation due to rectal inertia: technique and results. Int J Colorectal Dis 15: 100–104

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Waltraut Reichelt and Margot Yehia assisted in preparing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Shafik.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shafik, A., Shafik, A.A., El-Sibai, O. et al. Videodefecography: a study of the rectal motile pattern. Surg Radiol Anat 25, 139–144 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-003-0114-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-003-0114-1

Keywords

Navigation