Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Development of optimal irrigation schedules and crop water production function for cassava: study over three major growing areas in India

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Irrigation Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A study was conducted to develop optimal irrigation schedules and crop water production function for cassava in the three major growing areas of India, viz., Salem (Tamil Nadu), Thiruvananthapuram (Kerala), and West Godavari (Andhra Pradesh). The irrigation schedules and water requirements were simulated using CROPWAT, and the model result was verified with field values in Thiruvananthapuram, one of the study areas. The results indicated the wider applicability of CROPWAT in calculating water requirement as well as developing irrigation schedules for cassava irrespective of the agro-climatic conditions. The optimal gross irrigation requirement simulated by CROPWAT was 362, 610, and 703 mm in Thiruvananthapuram, West Godavari, and Salem, respectively, based on the soil, crop and climatic parameters. The optimal schedules were also developed in the study locations using CROPWAT, and it can be used for further irrigation practices and plans to maximize water productivity. Also, the field experimental data in Thiruvananthapuram showed a quadratic relation between crop water requirement and yield (R2 = 0.86). The derived crop water production function (CWPF), \({\text{yield}} = - \,0.0013{\text{ET}}_{\text{c}}^{ 2} \, + \,1.138{\text{ET}}_{\text{c}} \, - \,203.03\) provided yield of 39 × 103 kg ha−1 of cassava corresponding to the simulated gross irrigation requirement of 362 mm in Thiruvananthapuram. Thus the CWPF together with the optimal schedules is a useful tool for water managers and farmers to develop appropriate irrigation plans in advance to mitigate the water scarcity as the result of climate change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen RG, Pruitt WO (1991) FAO-24 Reference evapotranspiration factors. J Irrig Drain Eng 117(5):758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration: guidelines for computing crop requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 56. FAO, Rome, p 301

    Google Scholar 

  • Amarasinghe UA, Shah T, Turral H, Anand BK (2007) India’s water future to 2025–2050: Business-as-usual scenario and deviations. Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Water Management Institute. IWMI Research Report 123, pp 47

  • Bharadwaj SK (2001) Importance of drip irrigation in Indian Agriculture. Kissan World 28:32–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns A, Gleadow R, Cliff J, Zacarias A, Cavagnaro T (2010) Cassava: the drought, war and famine crop in a changing world. Sustainability 2:3572–3607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byju G, Sabitha S (2015) Soil resource inventory of ICAR-CTCRI farm using geospatial technologies. Tech Bull Ser 63:67

    Google Scholar 

  • Clumpner G, Solomon K (1987) Accuracy and geographic transferability of crop water production functions. In: James LG, Marshall MJ (eds) Irrigation Systems for the 21st Century. Am Soc Civ Eng, New York, pp 285–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor DJ, Cock JH, Parra GE (1981) Response of cassava to water shortage.I. Growth and yield. Field Crops Research 4:181–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Sharkawy MA, Cock JH (1984) Water use efficiency of cassava. I. Effects of air humidity and water stress on stomatal conductance and gas exchange. Crop Sci 24:297–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • English MJ (1990) Deficit irrigation I: analytical framework. J Irrig Drain Eng 116:399–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewaid SH, Abed SA, Al-Ansari N (2019) Crop water requirements and irrigation schedules for some major crops in Southern Iraq. Water 11:756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2004) The state of food insecurity in the world. Monitoring progress towards the world food summit and millennium development goals, p 40

  • FAO (2013) Save and grow cassava: a guide to sustainable production and identification. E-ISBN 978-92-5-107642-2

  • Gangwar A, Nayak TR, Singh RM, Sing A (2017) Estimation of crop water requirement using CROPWAT model for Bina Command, Madhya Pradesh. Indian J Ecol 44:71–76

    Google Scholar 

  • García-Tejero IF, Arriaga J, Durán-Zuazo VH, Muriel-Fernández JL (2013) Predicting crop-water production functions for long-term effects of deficit irrigation on citrus productivity (SW Spain). Arch Agron Soil Sci 59(12):1591–1606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Georgakopoulos P, Travlos IS, Kakabouki I, Kontopoulou C-K (2016) Climate change and chances for the cultivation of new crops. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca 44(2):347–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerbens-Leenes W, Hoekstra AY, van der Meer TH (2009) The water footprint of bioenergy. PNAS 106:10219–10223

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ghuman BS, Lal R (1983) Mulch and irrigation effects on plant-water relations and performance of cassava and sweet potato. Field Crops Res 7:13–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grieser J, Gommes R, Bernadi M (2006) New LocClim-the local climate estimator of FAO. Geophys Res Abstracts 8:08305

    Google Scholar 

  • Hossain MB, Yesmin S, Maniruzzaman M, Biswas JC (2017) Irrigation scheduling of Rice USING CROPWAT model in the Western Region of Bangladesh. Agriculturists 15(1):19–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis A, Ramirez-Villegas J, Campo BVH, Navarro-Racines C (2012) Is cassava the answer to African climate change adaptation? Trop Plant Biol 5(1):9–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karuku GN, Gachene CKK, Karanja N, Cornelis W, Verplancke H (2014) Use of CROPWAT model to predict water use in irrigated tomato production at Kabete. Kenya E Afr Agric J. 80(3):175–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Kipkorir EC, Raes D, Massawe B (2002) Seasonal water production functions and yield response factors for maize and onion in Perkerra, Kenya. Agric Water Manag 56:229–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kloss S, Pushpalatha R, Kamoyo KJ, Schütze N (2011) Evaluation of crop models for simulating and optimizing deficit irrigation systems in arid and semi-arid countries under climate variability. Water Resour Manage. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-011-9906-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Letey J, Dinar A (1986) Simulated crop water production functions for several crops when irrigated with saline water. Hilgardia 54(1):1–32. https://doi.org/10.3733/hilg.v54n01p032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manners R, van Etten J (2018) Are agricultural researchers working on the right crops to enable food and nutrition security under future climates? Glob Environ Change 53:182–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin S (1992) CROPWAT—A Computer Program for Irrigation Planning and Management. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 46. FAO land and Water Development Division Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome (Italy)

  • Marx S (2019) Cassava as feedstock for ethanol production: a global perspective. Bioethanol production from food crops sustainable sources, interventions, and challenges. Academic press, Cambridge, pp 101–113

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Michael AM (1978) Irrigation theory and practice. Vikas Publishing House Pvt ltd, Noida, p 801

    Google Scholar 

  • Munoz G, Grieser J (2006) CLIMWAT water resources, development and management service and the environment and natural resources service. FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Nayar TVR, Kabeerathumma S, Potty VP, Mohankumar CR (1993) Recent progress in cassava Agronomy in India. In: Proc. 4th Regional Workshop on Cassava breeding Agronomy research and tech. transfer in Asia, Trivandrum, Kerala, India, pp 61–83

  • Odubanjo OO, Olufayo AA, Oguntunde PG (2011) Water use, growth, and yield of drip irrigated cassava in a humid tropical environment. Soil Water Res 6(1):10–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Or D, Wraith JM, Warrick AW (2002) Soil water content and water potential relationships. Soil Phys Companion 1:49–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Polthanee A, Srisutham M (2017) Supplementary irrigation for cassava planted in the late rainy season of Northeastern Thailand. Asian J Crop Sci 9(4):100–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pongpinyopap S, Mungcharoen T (2012) Comparative study of green water footprint estimation methods for Thailand: a case study of cassava-based ethanol. Environ Nat Resour J 10(2):66–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal DM, Ort DR (2012) Examining cassava’s potential to enhance food security under climate change. Trop Plant Biol 5:30–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabitha S, Byju G, Sreekumar J (2016) Projected changes in mean temperature and total precipitation and climate suitability of cassava in major growing environments of India. Indian J Agric Sci 86(5):647–653

    Google Scholar 

  • Savva AP, Frenken K (2002) Irrigation manual: planning, development monitoring and evaluation of irrigated agriculture with farmer participation. Food Agric Organ II:150

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah V (2018) Determination of crop water requirements and irrigation scheduling using CROPWAT: a case study of Waghodia region. Int J Innov Res Sci Eng Technol 7(2):1137–1144

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon KH (1985) Typical Crop Water Production Functions. American Society of Agricultural Engineers winter meeting, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Sriroth K, Piyachomkwan K, Wanlapatit S, Nivitchanyong S (2010) The promise of a technology revolution in cassava bioethanol: from Thai practice to the world practice. Fuel 89(7):1333–1338

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Surendran U, Sushanth CM, George Mammen, Joseph EJ (2015) Modeling the crop water requirement using FAO-CROPWAT and assessment of water resources for sustainable water resource management: a case study in Palakkad district of humid tropical Kerala, India. Aquatic Proceedia 4:1211–1219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao NR, Goue B (1992) Water use efficiency of cassava crop as affected by soil water balance. Agric For Meteorol 61(3–4):187–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are thankful to All India Coordinated Research Project on Tuber Crops (AICRP-TC), India; ICAR-Central Tuber Crops Research Institute (ICAR-CTCRI), Thiruvananthapuram, India; and Department of Science & Technology-Women Scientist Scheme (DST WOS-A), India, for the complete support to fulfill this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Byju Gangadharan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Communicated by Byju Gangadharan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pushpalatha, R., Sarojini Amma, S., George, J. et al. Development of optimal irrigation schedules and crop water production function for cassava: study over three major growing areas in India. Irrig Sci 38, 251–261 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-020-00669-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-020-00669-0

Navigation