Skip to main content
Log in

The contribution of shallow groundwater by safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) under high water table conditions, with and without supplementary irrigation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Irrigation Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Lysimetric experiments were conducted to determine the contribution made by groundwater to the overall water requirements of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). The plants were grown in 24 columns, each having a diameter of 0.40 m and packed with silty clay soil. The four replicate randomized complete block factorial experiments were carried out using different treatment combinations. Six treatments were applied during each experiment by maintaining groundwater, with an EC of 1 dS m−1, at three different water table levels (0.6, 0.8 and 1.10 m) with and without supplementary irrigation. The uptake of groundwater as a part of crop evapotranspiration was measured by taking daily readings of the water levels found in Mariotte tubes. The supplementary irrigation requirement for each treatment was applied by adding water (EC of 1 dS m−1). The average percentage contribution from groundwater for the treatments (with and without supplementary irrigation under water table levels of 0.6, 0.8 and 1.10 m) were found to be 65, 59, 38% and 72, 70, 47% of the average annual safflower water requirement (6,466 m3 ha−1). The increase in groundwater depths under supplementary irrigation treatments from 0.6 to 0.80 and 1.10 m caused seed and oil yield reductions of (7, 23.10%) and (48.23, 65.40%), respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration-guidelines for computing crop water requirements (Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 56). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome, Italy

  • Ayars JE, Christen EW, Soppe RW (2006) The resource potential of in situ shallow groundwater use in irrigated agriculture: a review. Irrig Sci 24:147–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bargahei K, Mosavi S (2006) The effect of shallow saline groundwater on Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) in greenhouse condition. Agric Sci Nat Resourse J 3(1):59–69 (in Persian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Beke GJ, Volkmar KM (1995) Mineral composition of Flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) and Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) on a saline soil high in sulfate salts. Can J Plant Sci 75:399–404

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Benz LC, Doering EJ, Reichman GA (1981) Water table management saves water and energy. Trans ASAE 24:995–1001

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohm W (1979) Methods of studying root systems. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cassel DK, Edwards EC (1985) Effects of sub-soiling and irrigation on corn production. Soil Sci Soc Am J 49:996–1001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavero J, Plant RE, Shennan C, Friedman DB, Williams JR, Kiniry JR, Benson VW (1999) Modeling nitrogen cycling in tomato—safflower and tomato—wheat rotations. Agric Syst 60:123–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christos AD, Christos S (2008) Safflower yield, chlorophyll content, photosynthesis, and water use efficiency response to nitrogen fertilization under rainfed conditions. Ind Crops Products 27:75–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doorenbos J, Kassam AH (1979) Yield response to water. Irrigation and drainage paper 33. FAO, United Nations, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Francois LE, Bernestin L (1964) Salt tolerance of safflower. Agron J 54:38–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghamarnia H, Sepehri S (2010) Different irrigation regimes affect water use, yield and other yield components of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) crop in a semi-arid region of Iran. J Food Agric Environ 8(2):590–593

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghamarnia H, Golamian M, Sepehri S, Arji I (2011) Shallow groundwater use by safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) in a semi-arid region. Irrig Sci J 29:147–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gowing JW, Rose DA, Ghamarnia H (2009) The effect of salinity on water productivity of wheat under deficit irrigation above shallow groundwater. Agric Water Manage 96:517–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamrouni I, Salah HB, Marzouk B (2001) Effects of water-deficit on lipids of safflower aerial parts. Phytochemistry 58:277–280

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Irving DW, Shannon MC, Breda VA, Mackey BE (1998) Salinity effects on yield and oil quality of high linolate and high-oleate cultivars of Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). J Agric Food Chem 36:37–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Istanbulluoglu A, Gocmen E, Gezer E, Pasa C, Konukcu F (2009) Effects of water stress at different development stages on yield and water productivity of winter and summer safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Agric Water Manage 96:1429–1434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kafi M, Rostami M (2008) Yield Characteristics and oil content of three Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) cultivars under drought in reproductive stage and irrigation with saline water. Field Res J 5:121–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman HP (1958) Analyse der fette and fett produkte. Springer, Berlin, p 360

    Google Scholar 

  • Klute A (1998) Methods of soil analysis. Part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods, 2nd edn. American Society of Agronomy, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, pp 635–653

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovelli S, Perniola M, Ferrara A, Tommaso TD (2007a) Yield response factor to water (ky) and water use efficiency of (Carthamus tinctorius L. and Solanum melongena L.). J Agric Water Manage 92:73–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovelli S, Perniola M, Ferrara A, Tommaso TD (2007b) Yield response factor to water (ky) and water use efficiency of Carthamus tinctorius L. and Solanum melongena L. Agric Water Manage 92:73–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Necdet Ç, Cüneyt Ç, Enver E, Enver E (2007) Seed yield oil contents and fatty acids composition of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) grown in northern Turkey conditions. J Fac Agric 22(1):98–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliviera IB, Demond AH , Salehzadeh A (1996) Packing of Sands for production of homogeneous Porous Media. Soil Sci Soc Am J 60:49–53

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pourdad SS (2008) Study on drought resistance indices in spring safflower. Acta Agron Hung 56(2):203–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rains DW, Goyal S, Weyrauch R, Lauchi A (1987) Saline drainage water reuse in a cotton rotation system. Calif Agric 41(9/10):24–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Soliman MAM, Mahrous NM, Gamalat AM (2011) Effect of water deficit on yield and yield components of some safflower genotypes under saline soil conditions. Int J Acad Res 3(2, Part IV):1088–1095

    Google Scholar 

  • Soppe RWO, Ayars JE (2003) Characterizing ground water use by Safflower using weighing lysimeters. Agric Water Manage 60:59–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the Razi University of Kermanshah for funding this study. We are also grateful to the Kermanshah Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Center for their valuable cooperation. English editing done by Dr Hooti Noorbakhsh and Mr Jafar Jazareri from Razi University is also gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Houshang Ghamarnia.

Additional information

Communicated by J. Ayars.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ghamarnia, H., Golamian, M., Sepehri, S. et al. The contribution of shallow groundwater by safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) under high water table conditions, with and without supplementary irrigation. Irrig Sci 31, 285–299 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-011-0304-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-011-0304-2

Keywords

Navigation