Abstract
Cablegation is a simple system for automating surface irrigation in small- and medium-sized fields using a gated pipe. In this work, a Programmable Logic Control, PLC, was used to develop an adaptive cablegation system capable of establishing the infiltration equation in real time and then adjusting the irrigation times to the infiltration rate and field geometry. A controlling program was developed for the on-field determination of the infiltration equation, simulation of advance in each furrow, and the optimization and management of the irrigation event. The equipment was tested in three experimental stations, including a Luvissol field organized in contour terraces with furrows of various lengths. The results demonstrate the capability of the system to adapt the application times to the different furrow lengths and the gradual decrease in the soil infiltration and to recommend an application depth that optimizes the Application Efficiency. Various improvements were made to this solar-powered cablegation, resulting in a reliable surface irrigation system capable of unsupervised operation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Thus, the Kostiakov–Lewis equation, also known as the modified Kostiakov equation, becomes \( Z = kt^{a} + f_{0} t \)
References
Alvarez JAR (2003) Estimation of advance and infiltration equations in furrow irrigation for untested discharges. Agric water Manag 60:227–239
Buchleiter G (2007) Irrigation system automation. Irrigation of agricultural crops. Am Soc Agronomy Monograph #30, 2nd edn. Am Soc Agronomy, Madison, WI, pp 181–194
Burt CM, Clemmens AJ, Strelkoff TS, Solomon KH, Bliesner RD, Hardy LA, Howell TA, Eisenhauer DE (1997) Irrigation performance measures: efficiency and uniformity. J Irrig Drain Eng 123(4):423–442
Ebrahimian H, Liaghat A, Ghanbarian-Alavijeh B, Abbasi F (2010) Evaluation of various quick methods for estimating furrow and border infiltration parameters. Irrig Sci 28(6): 479–488
Elliot RL, Walker WR (1982) Field evaluation of furrow infiltration and advance functions. Trans ASAE 25(2):396–400
Fekersillassie AB, Eisenhauer DE (2000) Feedback-controlled surge irrigation: I model development. Trans ASAE 43(6):1621–1630
Furman A, Warrick AW, Zerihun D, Sanchez CA (2006) Modified Kostiakov infiltration function: accounting for initial and boundary conditions. J Irrig Drain Eng 132(6): 587
Gillies MH, Smith RJ (2005) Infiltration parameters from surface irrigation advance and run-off data. Irrig Sci 24:25–35
Goncalves JM, Pereira LS (2009) Decision support system for surface irrigation design. J Irrig Drain Eng 135(3):343–356
Haie N (1984) Hydrodynamic simulation of continuous ands surged surface flow. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Utah, Logan
Humpheris M, Trout TJ (1990) Feedback control of Cablegation systems. Proceedings of the third national irrigation symposium. ASAE, pp 667–674
Humpherys AS, Fisher HD (1995) Water sensor feedback control system for surface irrigation. Appl Eng Agric 11(1):61–65
Jayasudha V, Chandrasekaran D (2001) Fabrication and study of the performance characteristics of a semi-automated cablegation irrigation system. J Agric Eng 38(4):1–12
Katopodes ND, Tang JH, Clemmens AJ (1990) Estimation of surface irrigation parameters. J Irrig Drain Eng 116(5):676–694
Kemper WD (1981) Cablegation: I. Cable controlled plugs in perforated supply pipes for automatizing furrow irrigation. Trans ASAE 24(6):1526–1532
Kemper WD, Kincaid DC, Worstell RV, Heinemann WH, Trout TJ, Chapman JE, Kemper FW, Wilson M (1985) Cablegation type irrigation systems: description, design installation and performance. Draft copy, Kimberly, Idaho, USDA
Khatri KL, Smith RJ (2005) Evaluation of methods for determining infiltration parameters from irrigation advance data. Irrig Drain 54:467–482
Khatri KL, Smith RJ (2006) Real-time prediction of soil infiltration characteristics for the management of furrow irrigation. Irrig Sci 25(1):33–43. doi:10.1007/s00271-006-0032-1
Kincaid DC, Kemper WD (1982) Cablegation: II. Simulation and design of the moving gated pipe irrigation system. Trans ASAE 25(2):388–395
Lam Y, Slaughter DC, Wallender WW, Upadhyaya SK (2007) Machine vision monitoring for control of water advance in furrow irrigation. Trans ASABE 50(2):371–378
Langat PH, Raine SR, Smith RJ (2007) Errors in predicting furrow irrigation performance using single measures of infiltration. Irrig Sci 25:339–345
Luz PB, Heermann D (2005) A statistical approach to estimating runoff in center pivot irrigation with crust conditions. Agric Water Manag 72:33–46
Moravejalahkami B, Mostafazadeh-Fard B, Heidarpour M, Abbasi F (2009) Furrow infiltration and roughness prediction for different furrow inflow hydrographs using a zero-inertia model with a multilevel calibration approach. Biosyst Eng 103:374–381
Oyonarte NA, Mateos L, Palomo MJ (2002) Infiltration variability in furrow irrigation. J Irrig Drain Eng 128(1):26–33
Pérez C, Camacho E, Roldán J, Alcaide M, Reca J (1995) A control system of furrow irrigation in real time. Phys Chem Earth 20(3–4):351–358
Reddell DL, Latimer EA (1987) Field evaluation of an advance rate feedback irrigation system. In: Irrigation systems for the 21st Century. Proceedings/Irrigation & Drainage Div., ASCE, Portland, Oregan. pp 317–324
Sanchez CA, Zerihun D, Strelkoff TS, Clemmens AJ, Farrell-Poe KL (2008) Development of management guidelines for efficient irrigation of basins on sandy soils. Appl Eng Agric 24(2):215–224
Santos FL, Reis JL, Martins OC, Castanheira NL, Serralheiro RP (2003) Comparative assessment of infiltration, runoff and erosion of Sprinkler irrigated soils. Biosyst Eng 86(3):355–364
Sepaskhah AR, Bondar H (2002) Estimation of manning roughness coefficient for bare and vegetated furrow irrigation. Biosyst Eng 82(3):351–357
Shahidian S, Serralheiro RP, Silva LL (1998) Real time management of furrow irrigation with a cablegation system. In: Pereira LS, Gowing JW (eds) Water and the environment: innovation issues in irrigation and drainage. ICID-CIID, E & Spon, London, pp 149–155
Sousa PL, Cameira MR, Monteiro A (1992) Funcionamento e gestão do sistema Cabo-rega. In: Desenvolvimento de equipamentos mecanizados para rega de gravidade, ISA
Souza F (1981) Non-linear hydrodynamic model of furrow irrigation. PhD thesis, University of California, Davis, Calif
Strelkoff T, Clemmens AJ (1981) Dimensionless stream advance in sloping borders. ASCE J Irri Drain Div 107(4):361–382
Stringham GE, Keller J (1979) Surge flow for automatic irrigation. Proceedings of 1979 irrigation and drainage division specialty conference, Albuquerque, NM, July 17–20
Walker WD (1999) SIRMOD II surface irrigation design, evaluation and simulation software–User’s guide and technical documentation, Utah State University, Logan, Utah
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by T. Trooien.
Appendix 1: Some parameters of the irrigation events in year 2 at the Divor Station
Appendix 1: Some parameters of the irrigation events in year 2 at the Divor Station
Irrigation event | Gate opening (diam, mm) | Max. flow rate (L s−1) | tm (min) | tl (min) | k | a | Manning’s roughtness, n | Application depth (mm) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended | Applied | ||||||||
1 | 43 | 1.6 | 36.5 | 78.5 | 8.93 | 0.29 | 0.065 | 24 | 24 |
2 | 23 | 0.65 | 40 | 87 | 3.5 | 0.33 | 0.060 | 8 | 8 |
3 | 23 | 0.65 | 36 | 77 | 3.13 | 0.32 | 0.055 | 8 | 7 |
4 | 23 | 0.65 | 34 | 70 | 1.97 | 0.35 | 0.055 | 7 | 8 |
5 | 23 | 0.65 | 28 | 59 | 1.97 | 0.35 | 0.050 | 8 | 8 |
6 | 23 | 0.65 | 32 | 65 | 3.26 | 0.25 | 0.050 | 9 | 9 |
7 | 23 | 0.65 | 32 | 65 | 3.26 | 0.25 | 0.050 | 9 | 9 |
8 | 23 | 0.65 | 29 | 60 | 2.37 | 0.31 | 0.048 | 8 | 8 |
9 | 23 | 0.65 | 28 | 57 | 2.38 | 0.28 | 0.045 | 5 | 11 |
11 | 23 | 0.65 | 33 | 68 | 3.2 | 0.27 | 0.052 | 7 | 11 |
12 | 23 | 0.65 | 31 | 63 | 3.04 | 0.26 | 0.052 | 7 | 11 |
14 | 23 | 0.65 | 31 | 63 | 3.04 | 0.26 | 0.050 | 6 | 10 |
16 | 23 | 0.65 | 29 | 58 | 2.89 | 0.24 | 0.045 | 6 | 10 |
17 | 23 | 0.65 | 26 | 54 | 1.75 | 0.35 | 0.045 | 4.4 | 7 |
19 | 23 | 0.65 | 24 | 48 | 1.76 | 0.29 | 0.040 | 4 | 7 |
20 | 23 | 0.65 | 29 | 50 | 0.61 | 0.27 | 0.048 | 7 | 10 |
21 | 18 | 0.47 | 34 | 68 | 2.37 | 0.23 | 0.050 | 5 | 6 |
22 | 15 | 0.38 | 58 | 112 | 5.59 | 0.11 | 0.060 | 7 | 7 |
23 | 15 | 0.38 | 39 | 74 | 2.11 | 0.22 | 0.060 | 5 | 6 |
25 | 23 | 0.65 | 29 | 59 | 2.57 | 0.27 | 0.045 | 6 | 10 |
26 | 23 | 0.65 | 27 | 54 | 2.22 | 0.26 | 0.045 | 4.4 | 8 |
27 | 23 | 0.65 | 27 | 54 | 2.22 | 0.26 | 0.045 | 4.4 | 4.4 |
28 | 23 | 0.65 | 27 | 54 | 2.22 | 0.26 | 0.045 | 4.4 | 4.4 |
29 | 23 | 0.65 | 27 | 54 | 2.22 | 0.26 | 0.045 | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shahidian, S., Serralheiro, R.P. Development of an adaptive surface irrigation system. Irrig Sci 30, 69–81 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-011-0262-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-011-0262-8