Skip to main content
Log in

Accounting for temporal inflow variation in the inverse solution for infiltration in surface irrigation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Irrigation Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A simple modification of the volume balance equation of the IPARM model is presented to facilitate the use of variable inflow. Traditional approaches for estimating infiltration from advance and/or runoff have merely considered the constant or step inflow case. Whenever this assumption is violated, significant uncertainty is introduced into the estimated infiltration parameters. Evaluation of the procedure with a number of data sets has demonstrated significant improvements in the estimates of infiltration parameters. Furthermore, the technique has shown that a portion of the apparent variability in estimated soil intake rates between furrows in the same field is a consequence of the constant inflow assumption. Accounting for the variable inflow to estimate infiltration functions, both standardised the shape of the infiltration curve and reduced the magnitude of the variation between curves. The proposed technique remains restricted by limitations similar to that of other volume balance models but offers greater performance under typical inflow variations often experienced in practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alazba AA (1999) Simulating furrow irrigation with different inflow patterns. J Irrigat Drain Eng 125(1):12–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeTar WR (1989) Infiltration function from furrow stream advance. J Irrigat Drain Eng 115(4):722–733

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldeiry AA, Garcia LA, El-Zaher ASA, Kiwan ME-S (2005) Furrow irrigation system design for clay soils in arid regions. Appl Eng Agric 21(3):411–420

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott RL, Walker WR, Skogerboe GV (1983) Infiltration parameters from furrow irrigation advance data. Trans ASAE 26(6):1726–1731

    Google Scholar 

  • Gharbi A, Daghari H, Cherif K (1993) Effect of flow fluctuations on free draining, sloping furrow and border irrigation systems. Agric Water Manage 24(4):299–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillies MH, Smith RJ (2005) Infiltration parameters from surface irrigation advance and run-off data. Irrigat Sci 24(1):25–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guardo M, Oad R, Podmore TH (2000) Comparison of zero-inertia and volume balance advance-infiltration models. J Hydraulic Eng 126(6):457–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hornbuckle JW (1999) Modeling furrow irrigation on heavy clays, high water tables and tiled drained soils using sirmod in the murrumbidgee irrigation area. Undergraduate Thesis, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia

  • Jurriëns M, Lenselink KJ (2001) Straightforward furrow irrigation can be 70% efficient. Irrigat Drain 50(3):195–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mailhol JC, Priol M, Benali M (1999) A furrow irrigation model to improve irrigation practices in the gharb valley of morocco. Agric Water Manage 42(1):65–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClymont DJ, Smith RJ (1996) Infiltration parameters from optimization on furrow irrigation advance data. Irrig Sci 17(1):15–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raine SR, McClymont DJ, Smith RJ (1997) The development of guidelines for surface irrigation in areas with variable infiltration. Australian Society of Sugar Cane Technologists, Cairns, Australia, pp 293–301

  • Renault D, Wallender WW (1996) Initial-inflow-variation impacts on furrow irrigation evaluation. J Irrigat Drain Eng 122(1):7–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scaloppi EJ, Merkley GP, Willardson LS (1995) Intake parameters from advance and wetting phases of surface irrigation. J Irrigat Drain Eng 121(1):57–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwankl LJ, Raghuwanshi NS, Wallender WW (2000) Furrow irrigation performance under spatially varying conditions. J Irrigat Drain Eng 126(6):355–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trout TJ, Mackey BE (1988) Inflow–outflow infiltration measurement accuracy. J Irrigat Drain Eng 114(2):256–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valiantzas JD (1997) Volume balance irrigation advance equation: Variation of surface shape factor. J Irrigat Drain Eng 123(4):307–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valiantzas JD (2000) Surface water storage independent equation for predicting furrow irrigation advance. Irrigat Sci 19(3):15–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker WR (2003) Surface irrigation simulation, evaluation and design. Course Guide and Technical Documentation, Utah State University, Logan, Utah, 145

  • Walker WR (2005) Multilevel calibration of furrow infiltration and roughness. J Irrigat Drain Eng 131(2):129–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr John Hornbuckle CSIRO Land & Water for permission to use his furrow irrigation data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. H. Gillies.

Additional information

Communicated by T. Trooien

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gillies, M.H., Smith, R.J. & Raine, S.R. Accounting for temporal inflow variation in the inverse solution for infiltration in surface irrigation. Irrig Sci 25, 87–97 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-006-0037-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-006-0037-9

Keywords

Navigation