Skip to main content
Log in

Canopy temperature variability as an indicator of crop water stress severity

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Irrigation Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Irrigation scheduling requires an operational means to quantify plant water stress. Remote sensing may offer quick measurements with regional coverage that cannot be achieved by current ground-based sampling techniques. This study explored the relation between variability in fine-resolution measurements of canopy temperature and crop water stress in cotton fields in Central Arizona, USA. By using both measurements and simulation models, this analysis compared the standard deviation of the canopy temperature \( {\left( {\sigma _{{T_{{\text{c}}} }} } \right)} \) to the more complex and data intensive crop water stress index (CWSI). For low water stress, field \( \sigma _{{T_{{\text{c}}} }} \) was used to quantify water deficit with some confidence. For moderately stressed crops, the \( \sigma _{{T_{{\text{c}}} }} \) was very sensitive to variations in plant water stress and had a linear relation with field-scale CWSI. For highly stressed crops, the estimation of water stress from \( \sigma _{{T_{{\text{c}}} }} \) is not recommended. For all applications of \( \sigma _{{T_{{\text{c}}} }} , \) one must account for variations in irrigation uniformity, field root zone water holding capacity, meteorological conditions and spatial resolution of T c data. These sensitivities limit the operational application of \( \sigma _{{T_{{\text{c}}} }} \) for irrigation scheduling. On the other hand, \( \sigma _{{T_{{\text{c}}} }} \) was most sensitive to water stress in the range in which most irrigation decisions are made, thus, with some consideration of daily meteorological conditions, \( \sigma _{{T_{{\text{c}}} }} \) could provide a relative measure of temporal variations in root zone water availability. For large irrigation districts, this may be an economical option for minimizing water use and maximizing crop yield.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. At this point in the discussion, it is important to define three measures of surface temperature: T c, T o and T s. T c is the canopy temperature, defined by Norman et al. (1995) as the temperature at which the “vegetation dominates the (measurement) field of view minimizing the effect of soil”. T o is the temperature of the soil surface. T s is the surface composite temperature, defined by Norman et al. (1995) as the “aggregate temperature of all objects comprising the surface”, which was shown by Kustas et al. (1990) to be a linear function of T c and T o. When the surface is completely covered by vegetation, T s=T c and when the surface is bare soil, T s=T o.

References

  • Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration. Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO irrigation and drainage paper no 56. FAO, Rome

  • Bralts VF, Kesner CD (1983) Drip irrigation field uniformity estimation. Trans ASAE 26:1369–1374

    Google Scholar 

  • Brutsaert W (1982) Evaporation into the atmosphere theory, history and applications. D Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant RB, Moran MS (1999) Determining crop water stress from crop canopy temperature variability. In: Proceedings of the international airborne remote sensing conference, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, 21–24 June 1999, pp I289–I296

  • Clawson KL, Blad BL (1982) Infrared thermometry for scheduling irrigation of corn. Agron J 74:311–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Clemmens AJ, Dedrick AR (1994) Irrigation techniques and evaluations. In: Tanji KK, Yaron B (eds) Adv Series Agric Sci, vol 22. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 64–103

  • Doorembos J, Pruitt WO (1977) Crop water requirements. FAO irrigation and drainage paper no.24. FAO, Rome

  • Gardner BR, Blad BL, Watts DG (1981) Plant and air temperature in differentially-irrigated corn. Agric Meteorol 25:207–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González-Dugo MP, Bryant RB, Moran MS (2000) Uso de la variabilidad térmica en la determinación del estrés hídrico en cultivos (in Spanish). In: Proceedings of XVIII Congreso Nacional de Riegos, Huelva, Spain, 20–22 June 2000

  • Hart WE, Reynolds WN (1965) Analytical design of sprinkler systems. Trans ASAE 8:83–85, 89

    Google Scholar 

  • Huete AR (1988) A soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI). Remote Sens Environ 25:295–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Idso SB, Baker DG (1967) Relative importance of reradiation, convection and transpiration in heat transfer from plants. Plant Physiol 42:631–640

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Idso SB, Jackson RD (1969) Thermal radiation from the atmosphere. J Geophys Res 74:5397–5403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Idso SB, Jackson RD, Pinter PJ Jr, Reginato RJ, Hatfield JL (1981) Normalizing the stress-degree-day parameter for environmental variability. Agric Meteorol 24:45–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson RD (1982) Canopy temperature and crop water stress. Adv Irrig 1:43–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson RD, Idso SB, Reginato RJ, Pinter PJ (1981) Canopy temperature as a crop water stress indicator. Water Resour Res 17:1133–1138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson RD, Moran MS, Slater PN, Biggar SF (1987) Field calibration of reference reflectance panels. Remote Sens Environ 22:145–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson RD, Kustas WP, Choudhury BJ (1988) A reexamination of the crop water stress index. Irrig Sci 9:309–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kustas WP, Choudhury BJ, Inoue Y, Pinter PJ Jr, Moran MS, Jackson RD, Reginato RJ (1990) Ground and aircraft infrared observations over a partially-vegetated area. Int J Remote Sens 11:409–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monteith JL, Unsworth MH (1990) Principles of environmental physics, 2nd edn. Edward Arnold, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran MS, Clarke TR, Inoue Y, Vidal A (1994) Estimating crop water deficit using the relation between surface-air temperature and spectral vegetation index. Remote Sens Environ 49:246–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moran MS, Bryant RB, Clarke TR, Qi J (2001) Deployment and calibration of reference reflectance tarps for use with airborne cameras. Photog Eng Remote Sens 67:273–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen DR, Biggar JW, Erh KT (1973) Spatial variability of field-measured soil-water properties. Hilgardia 42:215–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman JM, Divakarla M, Goel NS (1995) Algorithms for extracting information from remote thermal-IR observations of the earth’s surface. Remote Sens Environ 51:157–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oyonarte NA, Mateos L (2003) Accounting for soil variability in the evaluation of furrow irrigation. Trans ASAE 45:85–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Reginato RJ (1983) Field quantification of crop water stress. Trans ASAE 26:772–775

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie JT (1973) Influence of soil water status and meteorological conditions on evaporation from a corn canopy. Agron J 65:893–897

    Google Scholar 

  • Thom AS, Oliver HR (1977) On Penman’s equation for estimating regional evaporation. Q J R Meteorol Soc 103:345–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vieira SR, Nielsen DR, Biggar JW (1981) Spatial variability of field-measured infiltration rate. Soil Sci Soc Am J 45:1040–1048

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was made possible with funding and support provided by NASA Stennis Space Center. Additional support was provided through the Cooperative Research Program of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). The authors would like to thank the staff at the University of Arizona Maricopa Agricultural Center and pilot Larry Hinton for their research support and collaboration.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. P. González-Dugo.

Additional information

Communicated by P. Waller

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

González-Dugo, M.P., Moran, M.S., Mateos, L. et al. Canopy temperature variability as an indicator of crop water stress severity. Irrig Sci 24, 233–240 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-005-0022-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-005-0022-8

Keywords

Navigation