Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of Anatomical, Procedural, and Operator Skill Factors on the Success and Duration of Fluoroscopy-Guided Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt

  • Clinical Investigation
  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the impact of anatomical, procedural, and operator skill factors on the success and duration of fluoroscopy-guided transjugular intrahepatic portoystemic shunt following standard operating procedure (SOP).

Material and Methods

During a 32-month period, 102 patients underwent transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation (TIPS) by two interventional radiologists (IR) following our institutional SOP based on fluoroscopy guidance. Both demographic and procedural data were assessed. The duration of the intervention (D Int) and of the portal vein puncture (D Punct) was analyzed depending on the skill level of the IR as well as the anatomic or procedural factors.

Results

In 99 of the 102 patients, successful TIPS without peri-procedural complications was performed. The mean D Int (IR1: 77 min; IR2: 51 min, P < 0.005) and the mean D Punct (IR1: 19 min; IR2: 13 min, P < 0.005) were significantly higher in TIPS performed by IR1 (with 2 years of clinical experience performing TIPS, n = 38) than by IR2 (>10 years of clinical experience performing TIPS, n = 61), (P < 0.005 both, Mann–Whitney U test). D Int showed a higher correlation with D Punct for IR2 (R 2 = 0.63) than for IR1 (R 2 = 0.13). There was no significant difference in the D Punct for both IRs with regard to the success of the wedged portography (P = 0.90), diameter of the portal vein (P = 0.60), central right portal vein length (P = 0.49), or liver function (MELD-Score before the TIPS procedure; P = 0.14).

Conclusion

TIPS following SOP is safe, fast, and reliable. The only significant factor for shorter D Punct and D Int was the clinical experience of the IR. Anatomic variability, successful portography, or liver function did not alter the duration or technical success of TIPS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Malinchoc M, Kamath PS, Gordon FD, Peine CJ, Rank J, ter Borg PC (2000) A model to predict poor survival in patients undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts. Hepatology 31(4):864–871

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kamath PS, Kim WR (2007) The model for end-stage liver disease (MELD). Hepatology 45(3):797–805

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Garcia-Tsao G, Groszmann RJ, Fisher RL, Conn HO, Atterbury CE, Glickman M (1985) Portal pressure, presence of gastroesophageal varices and variceal bleeding. Hepatology 5(3):419–424

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fidelman N, Kwan SW, LaBerge JM, Gordon RL, Ring EJ, Kerlan RK Jr (2012) The transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: an update. AJR Am J Roentgenol 199(4):746–755

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sorensen HT, Thulstrup AM, Mellemkjar L et al (2003) Long-term survival and cause-specific mortality in patients with cirrhosis of the liver: a nationwide cohort study in Denmark. J Clin Epidemiol 56(1):88–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Farsad K, Fuss C, Kolbeck KJ et al (2012) Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation using intravascular ultrasound guidance. J Vasc Interv Radiol 23(12):1594–1602

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kapoor BS, Esparaz A, Levitin A, McLennan G, Moon E, Sands M (2013) Nonvascular and portal vein applications of cone-beam computed tomography: current status. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 16(3):150–160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kee ST, Ganguly A, Daniel BL et al (2005) MR-guided transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation with use of a hybrid radiography/MR system. J Vasc Interv Radiol 16(2 Pt 1):227–234

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hamid RS, Azeemuddin M, Sajjad Z, Chishti I, Hamid RS, Salam B (2011) Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS): review of initial experience at Aga Khan University Hospital. The JPMA. J Pak Med Assoc 61(4):336–339

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gaba RC, Omene BO, Podczerwinski ES et al (2012) TIPS for treatment of variceal hemorrhage: clinical outcomes in 128 patients at a single institution over a 12-year period. J Vasc Interv Radiol 23(2):227–235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang HB, Zhang AZ, Yang CM et al (2012) Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt plus embolotherapy in the treatment of gastroesophageal varices: a report of 38 patients. Zhonghua yi xue za zhi 92(6):411–413

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zweers D, Geleijns J, Aarts NJ et al (1998) Patient and staff radiation dose in fluoroscopy-guided TIPS procedures and dose reduction, using dedicated fluoroscopy exposure settings. Br J Radiol 71(846):672–676

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hidajat N, Wust P, Kreuschner M, Felix R, Schroder RJ (2006) Radiation risks for the radiologist performing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). Br J Radiol 79(942):483–486

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Miller DL, Kwon D, Bonavia GH (2009) Reference levels for patient radiation doses in interventional radiology: proposed initial values for U.S. practice. Radiology 253(3):753–764

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. EDI EDdI, BAG BfG, Verbraucherschutz D. Merkblatt R-06-05 Diagnostische Referenzwerte für die Interventionelle Radiologie und die Kardiologie. In: EDI EDdI, BAG BfG, Verbraucherschutz D, eds. http://www.bag.admin.ch/themen/strahlung/10463/10958/index.html?lang=de&download=NHzLpZig7t,lnp6I0NTU042l2Z6ln1acy4Zn4Z2qZpnO2Yuq2Z6gpJCGfYF4e2ym162dpYbUzd,Gpd6emK2Oz9aGodetmqaN19XI2IdvoaCVZ,s-2008. Accessed Feb 2014

  16. Network EMA. Optimisation of patient and occupational exposure in interventional radiology. In: Network EMA, ed. http://www.eman-network.eu/IMG/pdf/WG2_Final_Report-2.pdf2012. Accessed Feb 2014

  17. Gaba RC, Khiatani VL, Knuttinen MG et al (2011) Comprehensive review of TIPS technical complications and how to avoid them. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196(3):675–685

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

There were no other individuals involved and no Grant given for this work.

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest to be declared by any of the authors.

Statement of Human and Animal Rights

For this type of study formal consent is not required.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steffen Marquardt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Marquardt, S., Rodt, T., Rosenthal, H. et al. Impact of Anatomical, Procedural, and Operator Skill Factors on the Success and Duration of Fluoroscopy-Guided Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 38, 903–912 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-014-1035-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-014-1035-6

Keywords

Navigation