Skip to main content
Log in

The Feasibility of Percutaneous Renal Cryoablation Under Local Anaesthesia

  • Clinical Investigation
  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of cryoablation of renal tumours without sedation.

Materials and methods

We prospectively evaluated 149 computed tomography-guided renal cryoablation procedures that were performed at our institution between 2009 and 2013. The patients received only 1 g of IV paracetamol prior to the procedure; intraprocedural, local anaesthesia was administered. We recorded the date and duration of the procedure, size and location of the tumour, number of cryoneedles used, need for dissection with saline or carbon dioxide and intraprocedural degree of pain, which was scored using an established visual analogue pain score (VAS) (0–10). Multivariate analysis was used to identify the associations between the recorded parameters and VAS.

Results

An interventional radiologist and a technician could perform all procedures without the help of anaesthesiologists and with adequate analgesia. The pain level ranged from 0 to 8 (mean, 2.0). It did not correlate with the tumour size or with the number of cryoneedles. It was significantly greater when the ice ball involved renal cavities (p = .0033) and when carbon dioxide was used for dissection (p < .0001). Conversely, the team experience was positively correlated with lower pain levels (p = .0381).

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that the cryoablation of renal tumours is feasible by interventional radiologists alone using a combination of IV paracetamol and local anaesthesia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Luciani LG, Cestari R, Tallarigo C (2000) Incidental renal cell carcinoma-age and stage characterization and clinical implications: study of 1092 patients (1982–1997). Urology 56:58–62

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lipworth L, Tarone RE, McLaughlin JK (2006) The epidemiology of renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 176:2353–2358. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2006.07.130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Colli JL, Busby JE, Amling CL (2009) Renal cell carcinoma rates compared with health status and behavior in the United States. Urology 73:431–436. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2008.06.044

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Allaf ME, Varkarakis IM, Bhayani SB et al (2005) Pain control requirements for percutaneous ablation of renal tumors: cryoablation versus radiofrequency ablation—initial observations 1. Radiology 237:366–370. doi:10.1148/radiol.2371040829

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kunkle DA, Uzzo RG (2008) Cryoablation or radiofrequency ablation of the small renal mass. Cancer 113:2671–2680. doi:10.1002/cncr.23896

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Truesdale CM, Soulen MC, Clark TWI et al (2013) Percutaneous computed tomography–guided renal mass radiofrequency ablation versus cryoablation doses of sedation medication used. J Vasc Interv Radiol 24:347–350. doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2012.11.022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Uppot RN, Silverman SG, Zagoria RJ et al (2009) Imaging-guided percutaneous ablation of renal cell carcinoma: a primer of how we do it. Am J Roentgenol 192:1558–1570. doi:10.2214/AJR.09.2582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nahum Goldberg S, Charboneau JW, Dodd GD et al (2003) Image-guided tumor ablation: proposal for standardization of terms and reporting criteria. Radiology 228:335–345. doi:10.1148/radiol.2282021787

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rosenberg MD, Kim CY, Tsivian M et al (2011) Percutaneous cryoablation of renal lesions with radiographic ice ball involvement of the renal sinus: analysis of hemorrhagic and collecting system complications. Am J Roentgenol 196:935–939. doi:10.2214/AJR.10.5182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Froemming A, Atwell T, Farrell M et al (2010) Probe retraction during renal tumor cryoablation: a technique to minimize direct ureteral injury. J Vasc Interv Radiol 21:148–151. doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2009.09.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sidana A, Aggarwal P, Feng Z et al (2010) Complications of renal cryoablation: a single center experience. J Urol 184:42–47. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2010.03.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gage AA, Baust JM, Baust JG (2009) Experimental cryosurgery investigations in vivo. Cryobiology 59:229–243. doi:10.1016/j.cryobiol.2009.10.001

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Johnson S (2010) Sedation and analgesia in the performance of interventional procedures. Semin Intervent Radiol 27:368–373. doi:10.1055/s-0030-1267851

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Moran TC, Kaye AD, Mai AH, Bok LR (2013) Sedation, analgesia, and local anesthesia: a review for general and interventional radiologists. Radiographics 33:E47–E60. doi:10.1148/rg.332125012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Sedation and Analgesia by Non-Anesthesiologists (2002) Practice guidelines for sedation and analgesia by non-anesthesiologists. Anesthesiology 96:1004–1017. doi:10.1097/00000542-200204000-00031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Buy X, Tok C-H, Szwarc D et al (2009) Thermal protection during percutaneous thermal ablation procedures: interest of carbon dioxide dissection and temperature monitoring. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 32:529–534. doi:10.1007/s00270-009-9524-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Allen BC, Remer EM (2010) Percutaneous cryoablation of renal tumors: patient selection, technique, and postprocedural imaging. Radiographics 30:887–900. doi:10.1148/rg.304095134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lusch A, Leary R, Heidari E et al (2014) Intrarenal and extrarenal autonomic nervous system redefined. J Urol 191:1060–1065. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2013.11.108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest

Eric de Kerviler is consultant for Galil Medical, Constance de Margerie-Mellon has no conflict of interest, Alexandre Coffin has no conflict of interest, Guillaume Legrand has no conflict of interest, Matthieu Resche-Rigon has no conflict of interest, Guillaume Ploussard has no conflict of interest, Paul Meria has no conflict of interest, Pierre Mongiat-Artus has no conflict of interest, François Desgrandchamps has no conflict of interest, Cédric de Bazelaire has no conflict of interest.

Statement of Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Statement of Human and Animal Rights

Ethical approval: All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric de Kerviler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Kerviler, E., de Margerie-Mellon, C., Coffin, A. et al. The Feasibility of Percutaneous Renal Cryoablation Under Local Anaesthesia. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 38, 672–677 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-014-0995-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-014-0995-x

Keywords

Navigation