Skip to main content
Log in

Single-session Aspiration Thrombectomy of Lower Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis Using Large-size Catheter without Pharmacologic Thrombolysis

  • Clinical Investigation
  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To retrospectively evaluate the efficacy of single-session aspiration thrombectomy using large catheters without pharmacologic thrombolysis to treat acute and subacute lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT).

Methods

From January 2008 to December 2011, single-session aspiration thrombectomy using large, 11F introducer catheters to treat acute and subacute lower extremity DVT was performed in 74 limbs of 74 patients (M/F = 23/51, age range 36–88 years), and clinical and imaging follow-up of over 6 months were obtained in 26 patients. Causes of DVT were May–Thurner syndrome (n = 65), malignancy related (n = 6), and pelvic mass (n = 3). A 14F introducer sheath was inserted through the popliteal vein, followed by rotational thrombus maceration and aspiration thrombectomy. Angioplasty and stent placement were performed when needed. Radiological images and medical records were reviewed for immediate and midterm results, complications, and recurrences.

Results

Initial technical success rate was 89.2 % (66 patients). Stenting was performed in 55 patients. The failures were due to underlying chronic thrombi/DVT (n = 7) and stent failure due to huge pelvic mass (n = 1). There was no procedure-related complication. In the 26 midterm follow-up patients for a duration of 6–48 months, there was no recurrence (n = 20), stent occlusion (n = 3), or femoral vein occlusion (n = 3). One-year primary patency rate in stent/iliac vein, femoral vein, and popliteal/infrapopliteal vein were 88.5, 88.5, and 96.2 %, respectively.

Conclusion

Single-session aspiration thrombectomy for acute and subacute lower extremity DVT using large introducer catheters without pharmacologic thrombolysis is feasible with acceptable immediate and midterm results, excluding complications related to pharmacologic thrombolysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sharafuddin MJ, Sun S, Hoballah JJ et al (2003) Endovascular management of venous thrombotic and occlusive diseases of the lower extremities. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14:405–423

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Levine M, Gent M, Hirsh J et al (1996) A comparison of low-molecular-weight heparin administered primarily at home with unfractionated heparin administered in the hospital for proximal deep-vein thrombosis. N Engl J Med 334:677–681

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kearon C (2003) Natural history of venous thromboembolism. Circulation 107:122–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Krupski WC, Bass A, Dilley RB et al (1990) Propagation of deep venous thrombosis identified by duplex ultrasonography. J Vasc Surg 12:467–475

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mewissen MW, Seabrook GR, Meissner MH et al (1999) Catheter-directed thrombolysis for lower extremity deep venous thrombosis: report of a national multicenter registry. Radiology 211:39–49

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Camerota AJ, Paolini D (2007) Treatment of acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis: a strategy of thrombus removal. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 33:351–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Prandoni P, Lensing AW, Prins MH et al (1999) Which is the outcome of the post-thrombotic syndrome? [letter]. Thromb Haemost 82:1358

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. McNamara TO, Fischer JR (1985) Thrombolysis of peripheral arterial and graft occlusions: improved results using high-dose urokinase. Am J Roentgenol 144:769–775

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Greenberg RK, Ouriel K, Srivastava S et al (2000) Mechanical versus chemical thrombolysis: an in vitro differentiation of thrombolytic mechanisms. J Vasc Interv Radiol 11:199–205

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Murphy KD (2004) Mechanical thrombectomy for DVT. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 7:79–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sharafuddin MJ, Hicks ME (1998) Current status of percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy. Part II. Devices and mechanisms of action. J Vasc Interv Radiol 9:15–31

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Roy S, Laerum F (1999) Transcatheter aspiration: the key to successful percutaneous treatment of deep venous thrombosis? Acad Radiol 6:730–735

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Parikh S, Motarjeme A, McNamara T et al (2008) Ultrasound-accelerated thrombolysis for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis: initial clinical experience. J Vasc Interv Radiol 19:521–528

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee KH, Han H, Lee KJ et al (2006) Mechanical thrombectomy of acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis with use of an Arrow-Trerotola percutaneous thrombectomy device. J Vasc Inter Radiol 17:487–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kasirajan K, Bray B, Ouriel K (2001) Percutaneous AngioJet thrombectomy in the management of extensive deep venous thrombosis. J Vasc Interv Radiol 12:179–185

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bush RL, Lin PH, Bates JT et al (2004) Pharmacomechanical thrombectomy for treatment of symptomatic lower extremity deep venous thrombosis: safety and feasibility study. J Vasc Surg 40:965–970

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Delomez M, Beregi JP, Willoteaux S et al (2001) Mechanical thrombectomy in patients with deep vein thrombosis. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 24:42–48

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kwon SH, Oh JH, Seo T et al (2009) Percutaneous aspiration thrombectomy for the treatment of acute lower extremity deep vein thrombosis: is thrombolysis needed? Clin Radiol 64:484–490

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kim YK, Kang BC, Gang SG (2004) Efficacy and safety of rotating pigtail catheter: lower extremity deep vein thrombosis of May–Thurner syndrome. J Korean Radiol Soc 51:39–44

    Google Scholar 

  20. Oğuzkurt L, Ozkan U, Demirturk OS, Gur S (2011) Endovascular treatment of phlegmasia cerulea dolens with impending venous gangrene: manual aspiration thrombectomy as the first-line thrombus removal method. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 34:1214–1221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. O’Sullivan GJ (2011) The role of interventional radiology in the management of deep venous thrombosis: advanced therapy. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 34:445–461

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pianta MJ, Thomson KR (2011) Catheter-directed thrombolysis of lower limb thrombosis. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 34:25–36

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kim BJ, Chung HH, Lee SH et al (2010) Single-session endovascular treatment for symptomatic lower extremity deep vein thrombosis: a feasibility study. Acta Radiol 51:248–255

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Oguzhurt L, Ozkan U, Gulcan O et al (2012) Endovascular treatment of acute and subacute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis using manual aspiration thrombectomy: long-term results of 139 patients in a single center. Diagn Interv Radiol 18:410–416

    Google Scholar 

  25. Comerota AJ, Aldridge SC (1993) Thrombolytic therapy for deep venous thrombosis: a clinical review. Can J Surg 36:359–364

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Enden T, Haig Y, Kløw NE, CaVenT Study Group et al (2012) Long-term outcome after additional catheter-directed thrombolysis versus standard treatment for acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (the CaVenT study): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 379:31–38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Grewal NK, Martinez JT, Andrews L, Comerota AJ (2010) Quantity of clot lysed after catheter-directed thrombolysis for iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis correlated with postthrombotic morbidity. J Vasc Surg 51:1209–1214

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Comerota AJ, Grewal N, Martinez JT et al (2012) Postthrombotic morbidity correlates with residual thrombus following catheter-directed thrombolysis for iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis. J Vasc Surg 55:768–773

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bjarnason H, Kruse JR, Asinger DA et al (1997) Iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis: safety and efficacy outcome during 5 years of catheter-directed thrombolytic therapy. J Vasc Interv Radiol 8:405–418

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Comerota AJ, Kagan SA (2001) Catheter-directed thrombolysis for the treatment of acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis. Phlebology 15:149–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Professor Yoon Chul Rhim, Yonsei University College of Engineering, for his contributions and comments.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Do Yun Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Park, S.I., Lee, M., Lee, M.S. et al. Single-session Aspiration Thrombectomy of Lower Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis Using Large-size Catheter without Pharmacologic Thrombolysis. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 37, 412–419 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-013-0676-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-013-0676-1

Keywords

Navigation