Skip to main content
Log in

Incidence of Arterial Micro-embolization During Percutaneous AngioJet Thrombectomy of Hemodialysis Grafts

  • Clinical Investigation
  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study was designed to investigate the incidence of arterial embolization using a peripheral protection filter device in a series of patients undergoing percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy for the management of thrombosed hemodialysis arteriovenous grafts (AVGs).

Methods

This prospective, single-center study included all eligible patients presenting during an 18-month period to undergo AVG percutaneous thrombectomy. Inclusion criteria was a recently thrombosed AVG with 2 cm of artery before the next arterial branching. Primary endpoint was the incidence of distal arterial macro- and micro-embolization determined by both digital subtraction angiography and histopathological analysis of the material collected. Secondary endpoints included quantitative measurements of the specimens using a 0+ (no material) to 3+ (maximum load) score.

Results

In total, 42 patients met the study’s inclusion criteria. No procedure-related complications or angiographically evident arterial embolization were noted. Macroscopically evident material was present in 47.6 % (20/42 filters). Histopathology demonstrated that the embolic material was primary consisted of fibrin conglomerates and platelets (median score: 1.5, confidence interval: 1.0–3.0), whereas inflammatory cells, trapped erythrocytes, extracellular matrix, cholesterol clefts, foam cells, necrotic core, and smooth muscle cells also were detected. Mean total area of embolic material was 5.04 mm2 (range 0.05–5.21). The mean major axis of the largest particle was 1.83 mm (range 0.29–6.64), whereas 19 % (8/42) contained particles with major axis >1 mm and 12 % (5/42) with major axis >3 mm.

Conclusions

In this study, the percentage of arterial micro-embolization was significantly higher than previously reported. However, the detrimental, long-term, clinical relevance remains to be determined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gilmore J (2006) KDOQI clinical practice guidelines and clinical practice recommendations-2006 updates. Nephrol Nurs J 33(5):487–488

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hemodialysis Adequacy 2006 Work Group (2006) Clinical practice guidelines for hemodialysis adequacy, update 2006. Am J Kidney Dis 48((Suppl 1)):S2–S90

    Google Scholar 

  3. Eknoyan G, Levin NW (2002) Impact of the new K/DOQI guidelines. Blood Purif 20(1):103–108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pisoni RL, Young EW, Dykstra DM et al (2002) Vascular access use in Europe and the United States: results from the DOPPS. Kidney Int 61(1):305–316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Brotman DN, Fandos L, Faust GR, Doscher W, Cohen JR (1994) Hemodialysis graft salvage. J Am Coll Surg 178(5):431–434

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Etheredge EE, Haid SD, Maeser MN, Sicard GA, Anderson CB (1983) Salvage operations for malfunctioning polytetrafluoroethylene hemodialysis access grafts. Surgery 94(3):464–470

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gray RJ, Sacks D, Martin LG, Trerotola SO (2003) Reporting standards for percutaneous interventions in dialysis access. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14(9 Pt 2):S433–S442

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Palder SB, Kirkman RL, Whittemore AD, Hakim RM, Lazarus JM, Tilney NL (1985) Vascular access for hemodialysis. Patency rates and results of revision. Ann Surg 202(2):235–239

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Aruny JE, Lewis CA, Cardella JF et al (2003) Quality improvement guidelines for percutaneous management of the thrombosed or dysfunctional dialysis access. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14(9 Pt 2):S247–S253

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sofocleous CT, Schur I, Koh E et al (2003) Percutaneous treatment of complications occurring during hemodialysis graft recanalization. Eur J Radiol 47(3):237–246

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Barth KH, Gosnell MR, Palestrant AM et al (2000) Hydrodynamic thrombectomy system versus pulse-spray thrombolysis for thrombosed hemodialysis grafts: a multicenter prospective randomized comparison. Radiology 217(3):678–684

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Beathard GA, Welch BR, Maidment HJ (1996) Mechanical thrombolysis for the treatment of thrombosed hemodialysis access grafts. Radiology 200(3):711–716

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Trerotola SO, Lund GB, Scheel PJ Jr, Savader SJ, Venbrux AC, Osterman FA Jr (1994) Thrombosed dialysis access grafts: percutaneous mechanical declotting without urokinase. Radiology 191(3):721–726

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Trerotola SO, Vesely TM, Lund GB, Soulen MC, Ehrman KO, Cardella JF (1998) Treatment of thrombosed hemodialysis access grafts: Arrow-Trerotola percutaneous thrombolytic device versus pulse-spray thrombolysis. Arrow-Trerotola Percutaneous Thrombolytic Device Clinical Trial. Radiology 206(2):403–414

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Valji K, Bookstein JJ, Roberts AC, Oglevie SB, Pittman C, O’Neill MP (1995) Pulse-spray pharmacomechanical thrombolysis of thrombosed hemodialysis access grafts: long-term experience and comparison of original and current techniques. AJR Am J Roentgenol 164(6):1495–1500 (discussion 1501–1493)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Karnabatidis D, Spiliopoulos S, Tsetis D, Siablis D (2011) Quality improvement guidelines for percutaneous catheter-directed intra-arterial thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy for acute lower-limb ischemia. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 34(6):1123–1136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Angelini A, Reimers B, Della Barbera M et al (2002) Cerebral protection during carotid artery stenting: collection and histopathologic analysis of embolized debris. Stroke 33(2):456–461

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Angelini A, Rubartelli P, Mistrorigo F et al (2004) Distal protection with a filter device during coronary stenting in patients with stable and unstable angina. Circulation 110(5):515–521

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Henry M, Henry I, Klonaris C et al (2003) Renal angioplasty and stenting under protection: The way for the future? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 60(3):299–312

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Karnabatidis D, Katsanos K, Kagadis GC et al (2006) Distal embolism during percutaneous revascularization of infra-aortic arterial occlusive disease: an underestimated phenomenon. J Endovasc Ther 13(3):269–280

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Siablis D, Karnabatidis D, Katsanos K, Ravazoula P, Kraniotis P, Kagadis GC (2005) Outflow protection filters during percutaneous recanalization of lower extremities’ arterial occlusions: a pilot study. Eur J Radiol 55(2):243–249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Miyayama S, Yamashiro M, Shibata Y et al (2012) Thrombolysis and thromboaspiration for acute thromboembolic occlusion in the upper extremity. Jpn J Radiol 30(2):180–184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Littler P, Cullen N, Gould D, Bakran A, Powell S (2009) AngioJet thrombectomy for occluded dialysis fistulae: outcome data. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 32(2):265–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hori M, Gotoh K, Kitakaze M et al (1991) Role of oxygen-derived free radicals in myocardial edema and ischemia in coronary microvascular embolization. Circulation 84(2):828–840

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Angelini A, Della Barbera M, Thiene G (2007) Interventional procedures for atherothrombosis: pathology of retrieved material. Heart 93(10):1301–1308

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Muller-Hulsbeck S, Schafer PJ, Humme TH et al (2009) Embolic protection devices for peripheral application: Wasteful or useful? J Endovasc Ther 16(Suppl 1):I163–I169

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Topol EJ, Yadav JS (2000) Recognition of the importance of embolization in atherosclerotic vascular disease. Circulation 101(5):570–580

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hsu PK, Huang HC, Hsieh CC et al (2007) Effect of formalin fixation on tumor size determination in stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 84(6):1825–1829

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Winkler TA, Trerotola SO, Davidson DD, Milgrom ML (1995) Study of thrombus from thrombosed hemodialysis access grafts. Radiology 197(2):461–465

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ohki T, Roubin GS, Veith FJ, Iyer SS, Brady E (1999) Efficacy of a filter device in the prevention of embolic events during carotid angioplasty and stenting: an ex vivo analysis. J Vasc Surg 30(6):1034–1044

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Konig CW, Pusich B, Tepe G et al (2003) Frequent embolization in peripheral angioplasty: detection with an embolism protection device (AngioGuard) and electron microscopy. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 26(4):334–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

All authors have no conflict of interest

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dimitris Karnabatidis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koukounas, V., Karnabatidis, D., Diamantopoulos, A. et al. Incidence of Arterial Micro-embolization During Percutaneous AngioJet Thrombectomy of Hemodialysis Grafts. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 37, 405–411 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-013-0663-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-013-0663-6

Keywords

Navigation