Skip to main content
Log in

Intrahepatic Left to Right Portoportal Venous Collateral Vascular Formation in Patients Undergoing Right Portal Vein Ligation

  • Clinical Investigation
  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

We investigated intrahepatic vascular changes in patients undergoing right portal vein ligation (PVL) or portal vein embolization (PVE) in conjunction with the ensuing hypertrophic response and function of the left liver lobe.

Methods

Between December 2008 and October 2011, 7 patients underwent right PVL and 14 patients PVE. Computed tomographic (CT) volumetry to assess future remnant liver (FRL) and functional hepatobiliary scintigraphy were performed in all patients before and 3 weeks after portal vein occlusion. In 18 patients an intraoperative portography was performed to assess perfusion through the occluded portal branches.

Results

In all patients after initially successful PVL, reperfused portal veins were observed on CT scan 3 weeks after portal occlusion. This was confirmed in all cases during intraoperative portography. Intrahepatic portoportal collaterals were identified in all patients in the PVL group and in one patient in the PVE group. In all other PVE patients, complete occlusion of the embolized portal branches was observed on CT scan and on intraoperative portography. The median increase of FRL volume after PVE was 41.6 % (range 10–305 %), and after PVL was only 8.1 % (range 0–102 %) (p = 0.179). There were no differences in FRL function between both groups.

Conclusion

Preoperative PVE and PVL are both methods to induce hypertrophy of the FRL in anticipation of major liver resection. Compared to PVE, PVL seems less efficient in inducing hypertrophy of the nonoccluded left lobe. This could be caused by the formation of intrahepatic portoportal neocollateral vessels, through which the ligated portal branches are reperfused within 3 weeks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Makuuchi M, Thai BL, Takayasu K et al (1990) Preoperative portal embolization to increase safety of major hepatectomy for hilar bile duct carcinoma: a preliminary report. Surgery 107:521–527

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Madoff DC, Hicks ME, Abdalla EK et al (2003) Portal vein embolization with polyvinyl alcohol particles and coils in preparation for major liver resection for hepatobiliary malignancy: safety and effectiveness—study in 26 patients. Radiology 227:251–260

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nagino M, Kamiya J, Nishio H et al (2006) Two hundred forty consecutive portal vein embolizations before extended hepatectomy for biliary cancer: surgical outcome and long- term follow-up. Ann Surg 243:364–372

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Abulkhir A, Limongelli P, Healey AJ et al (2008) Preoperative portal vein embolization for major liver resection: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg 247:49–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kianmanesh R, Farges O, Abdalla EK et al (2003) Right portal vein ligation: a new planned two-step all-surgical approach for complete resection of primary gastrointestinal tumors with multiple bilateral liver metastases. J Am Coll Surg 197:164–170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Krupski G, Broring DC, Wittkugel O et al (2002) Formation of portal venous collaterals after ligation of the portal vein for induction of liver regeneration. Fortschr Roentgenstr 174:1281–1284

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Denys AL, Abehsera M, Sauvanet A et al (1999) Failure of right portal vein ligation to induce left lobe hypertrophy due to intrahepatic portoportal collaterals: successful treatment with portal vein embolization. Am J Roentgenol 17:633–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. de Graaf W, van Lienden KP, Dinant S et al (2010) Assessment of future remnant liver function using hepatobiliary scintigraphy in patients undergoing major liver resection. J Gastrointest Surg 14:369–378

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Honjo I, Kozaka S (1965) Extensive resection of the liver in two stages. Rev Int Hepatol 15:309–319

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Imamura H, Shimada R, Kubota M et al (1999) Preoperative portal vein embolization: an audit of 84 patients. Hepatology 29:1099–1105

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Goto Y, Nagino M, Nimura Y (1998) Doppler estimation of portal blood flow after percutaneous transhepatic portal vein embolization. Ann Surg 228:209–213

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wilms C, Mueller L, Lenk C et al (2008) Comparative study of portal vein embolization versus portal vein ligation for induction of hypertrophy of the future liver remnant using a mini-pig model. Ann Surg 247:825–834

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mueller L, Broering DC, Meyer J et al (2002) The induction of the immediate-early-genes Egr-1, PAI-1 and PRL-1 during liver regeneration in surgical models is related to increased portal flow. J Hepatol 37:606–612

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Um SH, Nishida O, Tokubayashi M et al (1994) Hemodynamic changes after ligation of a major branch of the portal vein in rats: comparison with rats with portal vein constriction. Hepatology 19:202–209

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Furrer K, Tian Y, Pfammatter T et al (2008) Selective portal vein embolization and ligation trigger different regenerative responses in the rat liver. Hepatology 47:1615–1623

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. van den Esschert JW, van Lienden KP, de Graaf W et al (2011) Portal vein embolization induces more liver regeneration than portal vein ligation in a standardized rabbit model. Surgery 149:378–385

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. van den Esschert JW, van Lienden KP, Alles LK et al (2012) Liver regeneration after portal vein embolization using absorbable and permanent embolization materials in a rabbit model. Ann Surg 255:311–318

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. de Baerre T, Denys A, Paradis V (2009) Comparison of four embolic materials for portal embolization: experimental study in pigs. Eur Radiol 19:1435–1442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Aussilhou B, Lesurtel M, Sauvanet A et al (2008) Right portal vein ligation is as efficient as portal vein embolization to induce hypertrophy of the left liver remnant. J Gastrointest Surg 12:297–303

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Broering DC, Hillert C, Krupski G et al (2002) Portal vein embolization vs. portal vein ligation for induction of hypertrophy of the future liver remnant. J Gastrointest Surg 6:905–913

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ferko A, Lesko M, Krajina A et al (2001) Intrahepatic portal vein branches after extrahepatic portal vein occlusion. Experimental study. Hepatogastroenterology 48:475–479

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. P. van Lienden.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Lienden, K.P., Hoekstra, L.T., Bennink, R.J. et al. Intrahepatic Left to Right Portoportal Venous Collateral Vascular Formation in Patients Undergoing Right Portal Vein Ligation. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 36, 1572–1579 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-013-0591-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-013-0591-5

Keywords

Navigation