Skip to main content
Log in

The Use of the “Preclosure” Technique for Antegrade Aspiration Thrombectomy with Large Catheters in Acute Limb Ischemia

  • Clinical Investigation
  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study was designed to assess retrospectively short- and mid-term outcomes of the use of a suture-mediated closure device to close the antegrade access in patients undergoing percutaneous aspiration thrombectomy with large catheters for acute leg ischemia.

Methods

Between November 2005 and February 2010, a suture-mediated active closure system (ProGlide® 6F, Abbott) was placed before arterial sheath (mean 9 F, range 6–12 F) introduction in 101 patients (74 men, 73 %, mean age 70.1 ± 12.6 years standard deviation). Data regarding mortality, complications, and factors contributing to vascular complications at the access site was collected for 6 month after the intervention to detect device-related problems. As a coincidence, 77 patients had follow-up visits for a duplex ultrasound.

Results

There were a total of 19 vascular complications (19 %) at the puncture site, all of which were of hemorrhagic nature and none of which consisted of vessel occlusion. Two major outcome complications (2 %) occurred. A retroperitoneal hematoma and a serious inguinal bleeding required additive treatment and did not result in permanent sequelae. Nine cases involved death of which eight were not attributable to the closure and one remained unclear. Successful closure was achieved in 95 patients (94 %); additional manual compression was sufficient in the majority of the remaining patients. Numerous factors contributing to vascular complications were encountered.

Conclusions

With acceptable short- and mid-term outcomes, the “preclose” technique can be a reliable option for the closure of a large antegrade femoral access even for patients at a high risk of vascular complications, such as those undergoing aspiration thrombectomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rutherford RB (2009) Clinical staging of acute limb ischemia as the basis for choice of revascularization method: when and how to intervene. Semin Vasc Surg 22(1):5–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sniderman KW, Bodner L, Saddekni S et al (1984) Percutaneous embolectomy by transcatheter aspiration. Work in progress. Radiology 150(2):357–361

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Diffin D, Kandarpa K (2001) Percutaneous recanalization of peripheral arterial occlusions. World J Surg 25(3):312–317 discussion 317–318

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lee W, Brown M, Nelson P et al (2007) Total percutaneous access for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (“Preclose” technique). J Vasc Surg 45(6):1095–1101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bechara CF, Annambhotla S, Lin PH (2010) Access site management with vascular closure devices for percutaneous transarterial procedures. J Vasc Surg 52(6):1682–1696

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dosluoglu H, Cherr G, Harris L et al (2007) Total percutaneous endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms using Perclose ProGlide closure devices. J Endovasc Ther 14(2):184–188

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Starck EE, McDermott JC, Crummy AB et al (1985) Percutaneous aspiration thromboembolectomy. Radiology 156(1):61–66

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Patel N, Sacks D, Patel RI et al (2003) SIR reporting standards for the treatment of acute limb ischemia with use of transluminal removal of arterial thrombus. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14(9 Pt 2):S453–S465

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Newcombe RG (1998) Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods. Stat Med 17(8):857–872

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kussmaul WG, Buchbinder M, Whitlow PL et al (1995) Rapid arterial hemostasis and decreased access site complications after cardiac catheterization and angioplasty: results of a randomized trial of a novel hemostatic device. J Am Coll Cardiol 25(7):1685–1692

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chevalier B, Lancelin B, Koning R et al (2003) Effect of a closure device on complication rates in high-local-risk patients: results of a randomized multicenter trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 58(3):285–291

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Popma JJ, Satler LF, Pichard AD et al (1993) Vascular complications after balloon and new device angioplasty. Circulation 88(4 Pt 1):1569–1578

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Moscucci M, Mansour KA, Kent KC et al (1994) Peripheral vascular complications of directional coronary atherectomy and stenting: predictors, management, and outcome. Am J Cardiol 74(5):448–453

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pracyk JB, Wall TC, Longabaugh JP et al (1998) A randomized trial of vascular hemostasis techniques to reduce femoral vascular complications after coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol 81(8):970–976

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Duda S, Wiskirchen J, Erb M et al (1999) Suture-mediated percutaneous closure of antegrade femoral arterial access sites in patients who have received full anticoagulation therapy. Radiology 210(1):47–52

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sohail MR, Khan AH, Holmes DR et al (2005) Infectious complications of percutaneous vascular closure devices. Mayo Clin Proc 80(8):1011–1015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Van Den Broek T, Liqui Lung PF, Suttorp MJ et al (2007) Vascular occlusion as a late complication of the Angio-Seal closure device. A review of literature. Minerva Cardioangiol 55(6):815–819

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kalapatapu V, Ali A, Masroor F et al (2006) Techniques for managing complications of arterial closure devices. Vasc Endovasc Surg 40(5):399–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wille J, Vos JA, Overtoom TT et al (2006) Acute leg ischemia: the dark side of a percutaneous femoral artery closure device. Ann Vasc Surg 20(2):278–281

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Derham C, Davies JF, Shahbazi R et al (2006) Iatrogenic limb ischemia caused by angiography closure devices. Vasc Endovasc Surg 40(6):492–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hoffer EK, Bloch RD (2003) Percutaneous arterial closure devices. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14(7):865–885

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Funke.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Funke, C., Pfiffner, R., Husmann, M. et al. The Use of the “Preclosure” Technique for Antegrade Aspiration Thrombectomy with Large Catheters in Acute Limb Ischemia. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 36, 377–384 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-012-0455-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-012-0455-4

Keywords

Navigation