Skip to main content
Log in

Endovascular Revascularization of Chronically Thrombosed Arteriovenous Fistulas and Grafts for Hemodialysis: A Retrospective Study in 15 Patients With 18 Access Sites

  • Clinical Investigation
  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The current study retrospectively evaluated whether endovascular revascularization of chronically thrombosed and long-discarded vascular access sites for hemodialysis was feasible. Technical and clinical success rates, postintervention primary and secondary patency rates, and complications were reported. During a 1-year period, we reviewed a total of 924 interventions performed for dysfunction and/or failed hemodialysis vascular access sites and permanent catheters in 881 patients. In patients whose vascular access-site problems were considered untreatable or were considered treatable with a high risk of failure and access-site abandonment, we attempted to revascularize (resurrect) the chronically occluded and long-discarded (mummy) vascular access sites. We attempted to resurrect a total of 18 mummy access sites (mean age 46.6 ± 38.7 months; range 5–144) in 15 patients (8 women and 7 men; mean age 66.2 ± 11.5 years; age range 50–85) and had an overall technical success rate of 77.8%. Resurrection failure occurred in 3 fistulas and in 1 straight graft. The clinical success rate was 100% at 2 months after resurrection. In the 14 resurrected vascular access sites, 6 balloon-assisted maturation procedures were required in 5 fistulas; after access-site maturation, a total of 22 interventions were performed to maintain access-site patency. The mean go-through time for successful resurrection procedures was 146.6 ± 34.3 min (range 74–193). Postmaturation primary patency rates were 71.4 ± 12.1% at 30 days, 57.1 ± 13.2% at 60 days, 28.6 ± 13.4% at 90 days, and 19 ± 11.8% at 180 days. Postmaturation secondary patency rates were 100% at 30, 60, and 90 days and 81.8 ± 11.6% at 180 days. There were 2 major complications consisting of massive venous ruptures in 2 mummy access sites during balloon dilation; in both cases, prolonged balloon inflation failed to achieve hemostasis, but percutaneous N-butyl cyanoacrylate glue seal-off was performed successfully. Percutaneous resurrection of mummy vascular access sites for hemodialysis is technically feasible with high clinical success rates. In selected patients, resurrection of mummy access sites provides long-discarded access sites one more chance to be used for hemodialysis in an effort to preserve potential extremity sites for future access-site placement and to prevent long-term catheter indwelling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. NKF-K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for vascular access: updates 2006. Available at: http://www.kidney.org/professionals/KDOQI/guideline_upHD_PD_VA/va_guide2.htm. Accessed 15 Oct 2009

  2. Rajan DK, Clark TW, Simons ME, Kachura JR, Sniderman K (2002) Procedural success and patency after percutaneous treatment of thrombosed autogenous arteriovenous dialysis fistulas. J Vasc Interv Radiol 13:1211–1218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Beathard GA (2006) Successful treatment of the chronically thrombosed dialysis access graft: Resuscitation of dead grafts. Semin Dial 19:417–420

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jaffe R, Leung G, Munce NR, Thind AS, Leong-Poi H, Anderson KJ et al (2009) Natural history of experimental arterial chronic total occlusions. J Am Coll Cardiol 53:1148–1158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sacks D, Marinelli DL, Martin LG, Spies JB (2003) Reporting standards for clinical evaluation of new peripheral arterial revascularization devices. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14(Suppl 9 Pt 2):S395–S404

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Liang HL, Pan HB, Chung HM, Ger LP, Fang HC, Wu TH et al (2002) Restoration of thrombosed Brescia-Cimino dialysis fistulas by using percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. Radiology 223:339–344

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Turmel-Rodrigues L, Pengloan J, Rodrigue H, Brillet G, Lataste A, Pierre D et al (2000) Treatment of failed native arteriovenous fistulae for hemodialysis by interventional radiology. Kidney Int 57:1124–1140

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Vorwerk D, Bucker A, Alzen G, Schurmann K, Ritzerfeld M, Gunther RW (1995) Chronic venous occlusions in haemodialysis shunts: efficacy of percutaneous treatment. Nephrol Dial Transplant 10:1869–1873

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Turmel-Rodrigues L, Sapoval M, Pengloan J, Billaux L, Testou D, Hauss S et al (1997) Manual thromboaspiration and dilation of thrombosed dialysis access: mid-term results of a simple concept. J Vasc Interv Radiol 8:813–824

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gupta H, Murphy TP, Soares GM (1998) Use of a puncture needle for recanalization of an occluded right subclavian vein. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 21:508–511

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Honnef D, Wingen M, Gunther RW, Haage P (2005) Sharp central venous recanalization by means of a TIPS needle. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 28:673–676

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Yi-Wen Wu, the executive secretary of the VAT, for assistance in providing clinical follow-up for this study.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflict of interests to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matt Chiung-Yu Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weng, MJ., Chen, M.CY., Chi, WC. et al. Endovascular Revascularization of Chronically Thrombosed Arteriovenous Fistulas and Grafts for Hemodialysis: A Retrospective Study in 15 Patients With 18 Access Sites. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 34, 319–330 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-010-9926-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-010-9926-7

Keywords

Navigation