Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Embolization of the Gastroduodenal Artery Before Selective Internal Radiotherapy: A Prospectively Randomized Trial Comparing Standard Pushable Coils with Fibered Interlock Detachable Coils

  • Clinical Investigation
  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was compare embolization of the gastroduodenal artery (GDA) using standard pushable coils with the Interlock detachable coil (IDC), a novel fibered mechanically detachable long microcoil, in patients scheduled for selective internal radiotherapy (SIRT). Fifty patients (31 male and 19 female; median age 66.6 ± 8.1 years) were prospectively randomized for embolization using either standard coils or IDCs. Procedure time, radiation dose, number of embolization devices, complications, and durability of vessel occlusion at follow-up angiography were recorded. The procedures differed significantly in time (14:32 ± 5:56 min for standard coils vs. 2:13 ± 1:04 min for IDCs; p < 0.001); radiation dose for coil deployment (2479 ± 1237 cGycm² for standard coils vs. 275 ± 268 cGycm² for IDCs; p < 0.001); and vessel occlusion (17:18 ± 6:39 min for standard coils vs. 11:19 ± 7:54 min for IDCs; p = 0.002). A mean of 6.2 ± 1.8 coils (n = 27) were used in the standard coil group, and 1.3 ± 0.9 coils (p < 0.0001) were used in the IDC group (n = 23) because additional pushable coils were required to achieve GDA occlusion in 4 patients. In 2 patients, the IDC could not be deployed through a Soft-VU catheter. One standard coil dislodged in the hepatic artery and was retrieved. Vessel reperfusion was noted in only 1 patient in the standard coil group. Controlled embolization of the GDA with fibered IDCs was achieved more rapidly than with pushable coils. However, vessel occlusion may not be obtained using a single device only, and the use of sharply angled guiding catheters hampered coil pushability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Quick AM, Lo SS, Mayr NA et al (2009) Radiation therapy for intrahepatic malignancies. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 9:1511–1521

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dubel GJ, Soares GM (2008) Regional infusion-radioembolization. Surg Oncol Clin North Am 17:957–985 xii

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ibrahim SM, Lewandowski RJ, Sato KT et al (2008) Radioembolization for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a clinical review. World J Gastroenterol 14:1664–1669

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Riaz A, Lewandowski RJ, Kulik L et al (2009) Yttrium-90 radioembolization using TheraSphere in the management of primary and secondary liver tumors. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 53:311–316

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Welsh JS, Kennedy AS, Thomadsen B (2006) Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) for liver metastases secondary to colorectal adenocarcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 66(Suppl 2):S62–S73

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Konda A, Savin M, Cappell M, Duffy M (2009) Radiation microsphere-induced GI ulcers after selective internal radiation therapy for hepatic tumors: an underrecognized clinical entity. Gastrointest Endosc 70:561–567

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Thamboo TP, Wai CT, Lim LG et al (2008) Late gastric ulceration and cytomegalovirus infection following selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) of the liver. Pathology 40:303–305

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pech M, Kraetsch A, Wieners G et al (2009) Embolization of the gastroduodenal artery before selective internal radiotherapy: a prospectively randomized trial comparing platinum-fibered microcoils with the Amplatzer Vascular Plug II. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 32:455–461

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu DM, Salem R, Bui JT et al (2005) Angiographic considerations in patients undergoing liver-directed therapy. J Vasc Interv Radiol 16:911–935

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Yang FS, Ohta I, Chiang HJ et al (1994) Non-surgical retrieval of intravascular foreign body: experience of 12 cases. Eur J Radiol 18:1–5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gabelmann A, Kramer S, Gorich J (2001) Percutaneous retrieval of lost or misplaced intravascular objects. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176:1509–1513

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sheth R, Someshwar V, Warawdekar G (2007) Percutaneous retrieval of misplaced intravascular foreign objects with the Dormia basket: an effective solution. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 30:48–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chuang VP, Wallace S, Gianturco C et al (1981) Complications of coil embolization: prevention and management. AJR Am J Roentgenol 137:809–813

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cekirge HS, Saatci I, Firat MM et al (1996) Interlocking detachable coil occlusion in the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: preliminary results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 17:1651–1657

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Irie K, Taki W, Nakahara I et al (1997) Endovascular treatment of a partially thrombosed giant basilar tip aneurysm using interlocking detachable coils―case report. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 37:681–684

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kinoshita A, Ito M, Skakaguchi T et al (1994) Mechanical detachable coil as a therapeutic alternative for cerebral aneurysm. Neurol Res 16:475–476

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mori T, Sugimoto K, Taniguchi T et al (2004) Renal arteriovenous fistula with rapid blood flow successfully treated by transcatheter arterial embolization: application of interlocking detachable coil as coil anchor. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 27:374–376

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Reidy JF, Qureshi SA (1996) Interlocking detachable platinum coils, a controlled embolization device: early clinical experience. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 19:85–90

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Takahashi K, Tanimura K, Honda M et al (1999) Venous sac embolization of pulmonary arteriovenous malformation: preliminary experience using interlocking detachable coils. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 22:210–213

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Seltzer S, Aboulhosn J, Levi DS (2009) Use of interlock fibered detachable coils for occlusion of collaterals, coronary artery fistulae, and patent ductus arteriosus. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 74:770–776

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oliver Dudeck.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dudeck, O., Bulla, K., Wieners, G. et al. Embolization of the Gastroduodenal Artery Before Selective Internal Radiotherapy: A Prospectively Randomized Trial Comparing Standard Pushable Coils with Fibered Interlock Detachable Coils. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 34, 74–80 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-010-9845-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-010-9845-7

Keywords

Navigation