Skip to main content
Log in

The Size of Gelatin Sponge Particles: Differences with Preparation Method

  • TECHNICAL NOTE
  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To assess whether the size distribution of gelatin sponge particles differed according to the method used to make them and the type of original sheet.

Methods

Gelatin sponge particles of approximately 1–1.5 × 1–1.5 × 2 mm were made from either Spongel or Gelfoam sheets by cutting with a scalpel and scissors. Particles were also made of either Spongel or Gelfoam sheets by pumping with two syringes and a three-way stopcock. The size distribution of the particles in saline was compared among the groups.

Results

(1) Cutting versus pumping: When Spongel was used, cutting produced lower rates of smaller particles ≤500 μm and larger particles >2000 μm compared with pumping back and forth 30 times (1.1% vs 37.6%, p < 0.0001; 2.2% vs 14.4%, p = 0.008). When Gelfoam was used, cutting produced lower rates of smaller and larger particles compared with pumping (8.5% vs 20.4%, p = 0.1809; 0% vs 48.1%, p < 0.0001). (2) Spongel versus Gelfoam: There was no significant difference in the size distribution of the particles between Spongel and Gelfoam (p = 0.2002) when cutting was used.

Conclusion

The size distribution of gelatin sponge particles differed according to the method used to make them. More uniform particle sizes can be achieved by cutting than by pumping.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2 A–H.
Fig. 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gold RE, Grace DM (1975) Gelfoam embolization of the left gastric artery for bleeding ulcer: Experimental considerations. Radiology 116:575–580

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Vlahos L, Benakis V, Dimakakos P, et al. (1980) A comparative study of the degree of arterial recanalization in kidneys of dogs following transcatheter embolization with eight different materials. Eur Urol 6:180–185

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sniderman KW, Sos TA, Alonso DR (1981) Transcatheter embolization with gelfoam and avitene: The effect of sotradecol on the duration of arterial occlusion. Invest Radiol 16:501–507

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Jander HP, Russinovich NA (1980) Transcatheter gelfoam embolization in abdominal, retroperitoneal, and pelvic hemorrhage. Radiology 136:337–344

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Siskin GP, Englander M, Stainken BF, et al. (2000) Embolic agents used for uterine fibroid embolization. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175:767–773

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sonomura T, Yamada R, Kishi K, et al. (1997) Dependency of tissue necrosis on gelatin sponge particles size after canine hepatic artery embolization. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 20:50–53

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Spies JB, Benenati JF, Worthington-Kirsch RL, et al. (2001) Initial experience with use of tris-acryl gelatin microspheres for uterine artery embolization for leiomyomata. J Vasc Interv Radiol 12:1059–1063

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Pelage JP, Dref OL, Beregi JP (2003) Limited uterine artery embolization with tris-acryl gelatin microspheres for uterine fibroids. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14:15–20

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Laurent A, Wassef M, Maurice JPS, et al. (2006) Arterial distribution of calibrated tris-acryl gelatin and polyvinyl alcohol microspheres in a sheep kidney model. Invest Radiol 41:8–14

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Matsui O, Kadoya M, Yoshikawa J, et al. (1993) Small hepatocellular carcinoma: Treatment with subsegmental transcatheter arterial embolization. Radiology 188:79–83

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Oguni T, Korogi Y, Yasunaga T, et al. (2000) Superselective embolisation for intractable idiopathic epistaxis. Br J Radiol 73:1148–1153

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Yamashita Y, Takahashi M, Ito M, et al. (1991) Transcatheter arterial embolization in the management of postpartum hemorrhage due to genital tract injury. Obstet Gynecol 77:160–163

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Katsumori T, Nakajima K, Mihara T, et al. (2002) Uterine artery embolization using gelatin sponge particles alone for symptomatic uterine fibroids: Midterm results. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178:135–139

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Correll JT, Prentice HR, Wise EC (1945) Biological investigations of a new absorbable sponge. Surg Gynecol Obstet 81:585–589

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sangro B, Bilbao I, Herrero I, et al. (1993) Partial splenic embolization for the treatment of hypersplenism in cirrhosis. Hepatology 18:309–314

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mori H, Saida Y, Watanabe Y, et al. (2000) Rapid production of gelatin sponge particles for transcatheter arterial embolization: Pumping method. Nippon Acta Radiol 60:702–704

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

No financial support was received from any companies or organizations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tetsuya Katsumori.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Katsumori, T., Kasahara, T. The Size of Gelatin Sponge Particles: Differences with Preparation Method. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 29, 1077–1083 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-006-0059-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-006-0059-y

Keywords

Navigation