Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Mortality after Esophagectomy: Risk Factor Analysis

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Esophageal resection is associated with a high incidence of operative mortality, suggesting the need for predictors of operative risk. A retrospective analysis was performed for esophagectomy patients using univariate and multivariate analyses; relative risks (RR) were calculated. Of the 269 patients, 35 (13%) died. The optimal model for the preoperative prediction of risk of mortality was defined by age ( p = 0.001; RR = 2.6) and performance status ( p = 0.04; RR = 1.9). Delimiting the data pool using a calculated risk of 0.2 accurately identified outcomes in 79% of patients and predicted 41% of deaths. The optimal model for the overall prediction of risk of mortality was defined by age ( p = 0.001; RR = 3.9), intraoperative blood loss ( p < 0.001; RR = 1.7), pulmonary complications ( p = 0.002; RR = 6.6), and the need for inotropic support ( p = 0.003; RR = 10.2). The individual risk of mortality after esophagectomy can be predicted preoperatively with a model based on patient age and performance status. The findings underscore the importance of preoperative evaluation of cardiopulmonary function, meticulous operative technique, and aggressive respiratory care in the management of the esophagectomy patient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ferguson, M., Martin, T., Reeder, L. et al. Mortality after Esophagectomy: Risk Factor Analysis. World J. Surg. 21, 599–604 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002689900279

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002689900279

Keywords

Navigation