Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Role of Microbiome in the Outcomes Following Surgical Repair of Perianal Fistula: Prospective Cohort Study Design and Preliminary Results

  • Original Scientific Report
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Anal fistulae are common, predominantly cryptoglandular, and almost invariably require surgical treatment. Recurrences are common for procedures other than fistulotomy regardless of technique and adequacy of repair. Growing evidence supports the pivotal role of specific intestinal bacteria in anastomotic failures after bowel resection. Anal crypts harbor colonic microbiota suggesting that similar mechanisms to anastomotic healing might prevail after anal fistula repair and hence influence healing. This study aims at assessing the potential role of the intestinal microbiome in the clinical outcomes after surgical repair of cryptoglandular anal fistula.

Methods

This is a pilot prospective cohort study enrolling patients with anal fistula undergoing endoanal advancement flap. For microbiome analysis, stool samples are taken via rectal swab before the procedure; additionally, a portion of the fistula is collected intraoperatively after fistulectomy. Samples from groups with treatment failure are compared to samples from patients who healed after surgical repair. Alpha and beta diversities and differential abundance of microbial taxa are determined and compared between groups with DADA2 analytical pipeline.

Results

Five patients have been enrolled to date (one female, four male). At median follow-up of 6 months (2–11), one patient experienced disease recurrence at 3 months. DNA from the 5 rectal swab and tissue samples was extracted, showing increased relative abundance of Enterococcus faecalis in samples from the patient who developed a recurrent fistula but not in those without recurrence.

Conclusion

These very preliminary data suggest that intestinal microbiome may represent a crucial determinant of the surgical outcomes after anal fistula surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sainio P (1984) Fistula-in-ano in a defined population. Incidence and epidemiological aspects. Ann Chir Gynaecol 73:219–224

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Owen HA, Buchanan GN, Schizas A, Cohen R, Williams AB (2016) Quality of life with anal fistula. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 98:334–338

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Boenicke L, Karsten E, Zirngibl H, Ambe P (2017) Advancement flap for treatment of complex cryptoglandular anal fistula: prediction of therapy success or failure using anamnestic and clinical parameters. World J Surg 41:2395–2400

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. vander Mijnsbrugge GJH, Felt-Bersma RJF, HoMolenaar DKFCBH (2019) Perianal fistulas and the lift procedure: results, predictive factors for success, and long-term results with subsequent treatment. Tech Coloproctol 23:639

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Włodarczyk M, Włodarczyk J, Sobolewska-Włodarczyk A, Trzciński R, Dziki Ł, Fichna J (2021) Current concepts in the pathogenesis of cryptoglandular perianal fistula. J Int Med Res. https://doi.org/10.1177/0300060520986669

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Gaines S, Shao C, Hyman N, Alverdy JC (2018) Gut microbiome influences on anastomotic leak and recurrence rates following colorectal cancer surgery. Br J Surg 105:e131–e141

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Anderson DI, Keskey R, Ackerman MT, Zaborina O, Hyman N, Alverdy JC, Shogan BD (2021) Enterococcus faecalis is associated with anastomotic leak in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 22:1047–1051

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. (2013) 16s metagenomic sequencing library preparation. Illumina. https://support.illumina.com/documents/documentation/chemistry_documentation/16s/16s-metagenomic-libraryprep-guide-15044223-b.pdf

  9. Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, Han AW, Johnson AJA, Holmes SP (2016) DADA2: high resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods 13:581

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, Gerken J, Schweer T, Yarza P, Peplies J, Glöckner FO (2013) The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. https://doi.org/10.1093/NAR/GKS1219

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. McMurdie PJ, Holmes S (2013) Phyloseq: an R package for reproducible Interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061217

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Shogan BD, Belogortseva N, Luong PM et al (2015) Collagen degradation and MMP9 activation by Enterococcus faecalis contribute to intestinal anastomotic leak. Sci Transl Med. https://doi.org/10.1126/SCITRANSLMED.3010658

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Guyton K, Alverdy JC (2017) The gut microbiota and gastrointestinal surgery. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 14:43–54

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Reddy RM, Weir WB, Barnett S et al (2018) Increased variance in oral and gastric microbiome correlates with esophagectomy anastomotic leak. Ann Thorac Surg 105:865–870

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. van Praagh JB, de Goffau MC, Bakker IS, Harmsen HJM, Olinga P, Havenga K (2016) Intestinal microbiota and anastomotic leakage of stapled colorectal anastomoses: a pilot study. Surg Endosc 30:2259–2265

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. di Cristofaro L, Ruffolo C, Pinto E et al (2014) Complications after surgery for colorectal cancer affect quality of life and surgeon-patient relationship. Colorectal Dis 16:O407–O419

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Limura E, Giordano P (2015) Modern management of anal fistula. World J Gastroenterol 21:12–20

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Vogel JD, Johnson EK, Morris AM, Paquette IM, Saclarides TJ, Feingold DL, Steele SR (2016) Clinical practice guideline for the management of anorectal abscess, fistula-in-ano, and rectovaginal fistula. Dis Colon Rectum 59:1117–1133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hyman N, O’Brien S, Osler T (2009) Outcomes after fistulotomy: results of a prospective, multicenter regional study. Dis Colon Rectum 52:2022–2027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Abbas MA, Jackson CH, Haigh PI (2011) Predictors of outcome for anal fistula surgery. Arch Surg 146:1011–1016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mei Z, Wang Q, Zhang Y, Liu P, Ge M, Du P, Yang W, He Y (2019) Risk factors for recurrence after anal fistula surgery: a meta-analysis. Int J Surg 69:153–164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bosmans JWAM, Jongen ACHM, Bouvy ND, Derikx JPM (2015) Colorectal anastomotic healing: why the biological processes that lead to anastomotic leakage should be revealed prior to conducting intervention studies. BMC Gastroenterol. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12876-015-0410-3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Mocanu V, Dang JT, Ladak F, Tian C, Wang H, Birch DW, Karmali S (2019) Antibiotic use in prevention of anal fistulas following incision and drainage of anorectal abscesses: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg 217:910–917

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhu J, Wang Q, Mei Z (2021) Preliminary study on the pathogenesis of anal fistula. medRxiv. 04.15.21254769

Download references

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. No author has any relevant financial relationships to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Bertucci Zoccali.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This study has been approved by the Columbia University Medical Center Institutional Review Board (protocol ID: AAAU0274).

Informed consent

Written consent was obtained from all patients enrolled in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bertucci Zoccali, M., Moallem, D.H., Park, H. et al. Role of Microbiome in the Outcomes Following Surgical Repair of Perianal Fistula: Prospective Cohort Study Design and Preliminary Results. World J Surg 47, 3373–3379 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-023-07212-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-023-07212-0

Navigation