Skip to main content
Log in

Laparoscopic Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Child–Pugh A Patients With and Without Portal Hypertension: A Multicentre Study

  • Original Scientific Report
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) may improve outcomes for cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and portal hypertension (PHT). The aim of this study was to compare the short-term outcomes after LLR for HCC in cirrhotic patients with and without PHT.

Methods

This multicentric study included 96 HCC patients who underwent LLR. Clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) was defined by a hepatic venous pressure gradient ≥10 mmHg. Short-term outcomes and liver-specific complications including post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF), ascites and encephalopathy were compared between patients with and without CSPH.

Results

Thirty-one patients (32%) had CSPH. The CSPH group had higher post-operative morbidity (52% vs. 15%; p < 0.001), PHLF (10% vs. 0%; p = 0.03) and encephalopathy (10% vs. 0%; p = 0.03). There was no difference in terms of post-operative ascites between the two groups (CSPH: 16% vs. no CPSH: 8%, p = 0.28). The length of stay was longer in patients with CSPH than in those without CSPH (6 vs. 4 days; p < 0.001).

Conclusions

The laparoscopic approach is feasible in selected HCC patients with CSPH, at the price of significant increases in liver-specific complications and length of stay.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines (2018) Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 69(1):182–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cescon M, Vetrone G, Grazi GL et al (2009) Trends in perioperative outcome after hepatic resection: analysis of 1500 consecutive unselected cases over 20 years. Ann Surg 249(6):995–1002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bruix J, Castells A, Bosch J et al (1996) Surgical resection of hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients: prognostic value of preoperative portal pressure. Gastroenterology 111(4):1018–1022

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Llovet JM, Bru C, Bruix J (1999) Prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: the BCLC staging classification. Semin Liver Dis 19(3):329–338

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Vogel A, Cervantes A, Chau I et al (2018) Hepatocellular carcinoma: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 29(Suppl 4):iv238–iv255

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Citterio D, Facciorusso A, Sposito C et al (2016) Hierarchic interaction of factors associated with liver decompensation after resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. JAMA Surg 151(9):846–853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ciria R, Gomez-Luque I, Ocana S et al (2018) A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the short- and long-term outcomes for laparoscopic and open liver resections for hepatocellular carcinoma: updated results from the European guidelines meeting on laparoscopic liver surgery, Southampton, UK, 2017. Ann Surg Oncol 26(1):252–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Morise Z, Kawabe N, Kawase J et al (2013) Pure laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma with chronic liver disease. World J Hepatol 5(9):487–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40(5):373–383

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Johnson PJ, Berhane S, Kagebayashi C et al (2014) Assessment of liver function in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a new evidence-based approach-the ALBI grade. J Clin Oncol 33(6):550–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim WR, Biggins SW, Kremers WK et al (2008) Hyponatremia and mortality among patients on the liver-transplant waiting list. N Engl J Med 359(10):1018–1026

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Vallet-Pichard A, Mallet V, Nalpas B et al (2007) FIB-4: an inexpensive and accurate marker of fibrosis in HCV infection. Comparison with liver biopsy and fibrotest. Hepatology 46(1):32–36

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bosch J, Abraldes JG, Berzigotti A, Garcia-Pagan JC (2009) The clinical use of HVPG measurements in chronic liver disease. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 6(10):573–582

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Strasberg SM, Phillips C (2012) Use and dissemination of the brisbane 2000 nomenclature of liver anatomy and resections. Ann Surg 257(3):377–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kawaguchi Y, Fuks D, Kokudo N, Gayet B (2017) Difficulty of laparoscopic liver resection: proposal for a new classification. Ann Surg 267(1):13–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Slankamenac K, Graf R, Barkun J et al (2013) The comprehensive complication index: a novel continuous scale to measure surgical morbidity. Ann Surg 258(1):1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Koch M, Garden OJ, Padbury R et al (2011) Bile leakage after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a definition and grading of severity by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery. Surgery 149(5):680–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Moore KP, Wong F, Gines P et al (2003) The management of ascites in cirrhosis: report on the consensus conference of the international ascites club. Hepatology 38(1):258–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rahbari NN, Garden OJ, Padbury R et al (2011) Posthepatectomy liver failure: a definition and grading by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS). Surgery 149(5):713–724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rahbari NN, Garden OJ, Padbury R et al (2011) Post-hepatectomy haemorrhage: a definition and grading by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS). HPB (Oxford) 13(8):528–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Vilstrup H, Amodio P, Bajaj J et al (2014) Hepatic encephalopathy in chronic liver disease: 2014 practice guideline by the American association for the study of liver diseases and the European association for the study of the liver. Hepatology 60(2):715–735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Molina V, Sampson-Davila J, Ferrer J et al (2018) Benefits of laparoscopic liver resection in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and portal hypertension: a case-matched study. Surg Endosc 32(5):2345–2354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Soubrane O, Goumard C, Laurent A et al (2013) Laparoscopic resection of hepatocellular carcinoma: a French survey in 351 patients. HPB (Oxford) 16(4):357–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sposito C, Battiston C, Facciorusso A et al (2016) Propensity score analysis of outcomes following laparoscopic or open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Surg 103(7):871–880

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Berzigotti A, Reig M, Abraldes JG et al (2014) Portal hypertension and the outcome of surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma in compensated cirrhosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hepatology 61(2):526–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Boleslawski E, Petrovai G, Truant S et al (2012) Hepatic venous pressure gradient in the assessment of portal hypertension before liver resection in patients with cirrhosis. Br J Surg 99(6):855–863

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Cucchetti A, Cescon M, Golfieri R et al (2015) Hepatic venous pressure gradient in the preoperative assessment of patients with resectable hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 64(1):79–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Llovet JM, Fuster J, Bruix J (1999) Intention-to-treat analysis of surgical treatment for early hepatocellular carcinoma: resection versus transplantation. Hepatology 30(6):1434–1440

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Berardi G, Morise Z, Sposito C et al (2019) Development of a nomogram to predict outcome after liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in Child–Pugh B cirrhosis. J Hepatol 72(1):75–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MCR, CL, CS and ER participated in data collection. MCR and MCC participated in data analysis. MCR, CL, SLB, LL, JCF, ER, JF and DA participated in the writing process and manuscript revision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Margarida Casellas-Robert.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Margarida Casellas-Robert, Chetana Lim, Santiago Lopez-Ben, Laura Lladó, Chady Salloum, Jaume Codina-Font, Marc Comas-Cufí, Emilio Ramos, Joan Figueras and Daniel Azoulay have nothing to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Casellas-Robert, M., Lim, C., Lopez-Ben, S. et al. Laparoscopic Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Child–Pugh A Patients With and Without Portal Hypertension: A Multicentre Study. World J Surg 44, 3915–3922 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-020-05687-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-020-05687-9

Navigation