Abstract
Background
In this modern era, laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) has largely replaced open distal gastrectomy for the treatment of gastric cancer; however, a quantitative review of reconstruction methods applied exclusively using LDG has not yet been published. Thereafter, we compared three reconstruction methods (Billroth I, Billroth II, and Roux-en Y) using the data derived solely from LDG patients.
Methods
A systematic search was conducted using electronic bibliographic databases (Google Scholar, PubMed, and Embase), for articles that compared reconstruction methods in LDG, published within the last decade. A systematic review comparing 12 outcome parameters and sensitivity analyses were performed to increase the statistical power and minimize the inconsistency and heterogeneity of results.
Results
Twenty-three clinical trials involving 5797 patients were included in the meta-analysis. There were no significant differences in the postoperative recovery and intraoperative parameters, except for operation time. B1 demonstrated a significantly shorter operation time when compared with B2 and RY by 21.6 min (P < 0.0001) and 44.69 min (P < 0.0001), respectively. In terms of postoperative endoscopic symptoms, RY was significantly superior to B1 and B2 for bile reflux (P < 0.001) and remnant gastritis (P < 0.001). For postoperative complications, B1 showed a significantly lower rate of postoperative morbidity than did RY and B2 (P = 0.0006 and P = 0.0005, respectively).
Conclusions
Our study is the first meta-analysis comparing anastomoses in LDG and introduces novel criteria for consideration when selecting reconstructions in LDG. Considering the significant differences in postoperative complications and endoscopic symptoms, these two parameters lay reasonable groundwork for guiding the surgeon’s choice of reconstruction.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- LDG:
-
Laparoscopic distal gastrectomy
- ODG:
-
Open distal gastrectomy
- B1:
-
Billroth 1
- B2:
-
Billroth 2
- RY:
-
Roux-en-Y
References
Viñuela EF, Gonen M, Brennan MF et al (2012) Laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and high-quality nonrandomized studies. Ann Surg 255:446–456
Kim W, Song KY, Lee H-J et al (2008) The impact of comorbidity on surgical outcomes in laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy: a retrospective analysis of multicenter results. Ann Surg 248:793–799
Lee HW, Kim H-I, An JY et al (2011) Intracorporeal anastomosis using linear stapler in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: comparison between gastroduodenostomy and gastrojejunostomy. J Gastric Cancer 11:212–218
Kang K-C, Cho GS, Han SU et al (2011) Comparison of Billroth I and Billroth II reconstructions after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy: a retrospective analysis of large-scale multicenter results from Korea. Surg Endosc 25:1953–1961
Chen Y-S, Wu S-D, Kong J (2014) Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy and total intracorporeal reconstruction of the digestive tract in the treatment of benign peptic ulcers. J Surg Res 192:421–425
Shim JH, Oh SI, Yoo HM et al (2014) Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy after totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: comparison with Billorth II reconstruction. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 24:448–451
Choi CI, Baek DH, Lee SH et al (2016) Comparison between Billroth-II with Braun and Roux-en-Y reconstruction after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 20:1083–1090
Kim JJ, Kim SK, Jun KH et al (2007) Comparison of an uncut Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy with a Billroth I gastroduodenostomy after totally laproscopic distal gastrectomy. J Korean Gastric Cancer 7:139–145
Kim TG, Hur H, Ahn CW et al (2011) Efficacy of Roux-en-Y reconstruction using two circular staplers after subtotal gastrectomy: results from a pilot study comparing with Billroth-I reconstruction. J Gastric Cancer 11:219–224
Nomura E, Lee S-W, Bouras G et al (2011) Functional outcomes according to the size of the gastric remnant and type of reconstruction following laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 14:279–284
Oki E, Sakaguchi Y, Ohgaki K et al (2011) Surgical complications and the risk factors of totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 21:146–150
Kumagai K, Hiki N, Nunobe S et al (2011) Different features of complications with Billroth-I and Roux-en-Y reconstruction after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 15:2145–2152
Lee S-W, Tanigawa N, Nomura E et al (2012) Benefits of intracorporeal gastrointestinal anastomosis following laparoscopic distal gastrectomy. World J Surg Oncol 10:1
An JY, Cho I, Choi YY et al (2014) Totally laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: analysis of initial 50 consecutive cases of single surgeon in comparison with totally laparoscopic Billroth I reconstruction. Yonsei Med J 55:162–169
Inokuchi M, Kojima K, Yamada H et al (2013) Long-term outcomes of Roux-en-Y and Billroth-I reconstruction after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy. Gastric Cancer 16:67–73
Okabe H, Obama K, Tsunoda S et al (2014) Advantage of completely laparoscopic gastrectomy with linear stapled reconstruction: a long-term follow-up study. Ann Surg 259:109–116
Kitagami H, Morimoto M, Nozawa M et al (2014) Evaluation of the delta-shaped anastomosis in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: midterm results of a comparison with Roux-en-Y anastomosis. Surg Endosc 28:2137–2144
Suh Y-S, Park J-H, Kim TH et al (2015) Unaided stapling technique for pure single-incision distal gastrectomy in early gastric cancer: unaided delta-shaped anastomosis and uncut Roux-en-Y anastomosis. J Gastric Cancer 15:105–112
Komatsu S, Ichikawa D, Kubota T et al (2015) Clinical outcomes and quality of life according to types of reconstruction following laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 25:69–73
Park JY, Kim YJ (2014) Uncut Roux-en-Y reconstruction after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy can be a favorable method in terms of gastritis, bile reflux, and gastric residue. J Gastric Cancer 14:229–237
Kim CH, Song KY, Park CH et al (2015) A comparison of outcomes of three reconstruction methods after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy. J Gastric Cancer 15:46–52
Lee S-W, Kawai M, Tashiro K et al (2016) Laparoscopic gastrointestinal anastomoses using knotless barbed absorbable sutures are safe and reproducible: a single-center experience with 242 patients. Jpn J Clin Oncol 46:329
Yang D, He L, Tong W-H et al (2017) Randomized controlled trial of uncut Roux-en-Y vs Billroth II reconstruction after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: which technique is better for avoiding biliary reflux and gastritis? World J Gastroenterol 23(34):6350
Choi YY, Noh SH, An JY (2017) A randomized controlled trial of Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy vs. gastroduodenostomy with respect to the improvement of type 2 diabetes mellitus after distal gastrectomy in gastric cancer patients. PLoS ONE 12(12):e0188904
Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ et al (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 327:557–560
Higgins J, Thompson SG (2002) Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 21:1539–1558
Stang A (2010) Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol 25(9):603–605
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J et al (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 151:264–269
Fleiss J (1993) Review papers: the statistical basis of meta-analysis. Stat Methods Med Res 2:121–145
Zong L, Chen P (2010) Billroth I vs. Billroth II vs. Roux-en-Y following distal gastrectomy: a meta-analysis based on 15 studies. Hepatogastroenterology 58:1413–1424
Xiong J-J, Altaf K, Javed MA et al (2013) Roux-en-Y versus Billroth I reconstruction after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 19:1124
Chareton B, Landen S, Manganas D et al (1996) Prospective randomized trial comparing Billroth I and Billroth II procedures for carcinoma of the gastric antrum. J Am Coll Surg 183:190–194
Zeng Y-K, Yang Z-L, Peng J-S et al (2012) Laparoscopy-assisted versus open distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: evidence from randomized and nonrandomized clinical trials. Ann Surg 256:39–52
Fukuhara K, Osugi H, Takemura M et al (2002) Reconstructive procedure after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer that best prevents duodenogastroesophageal reflux. World J Surg 26(12):1452–1457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-002-6363-z
Ishikawa M, Kitayama J, Kaizaki S et al (2005) Prospective randomized trial comparing Billroth I and Roux-en-Y procedures after distal gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma. World J Surg 29(11):1415–1420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-7830-0
Osugi H, Fukuhara K, Takada N et al (2003) Reconstructive procedure after distal gastrectomy to prevent remnant gastritis. Hepatogastroenterology 51:1215–1218
Shinoto K, Ochiai T, Suzuki T et al (2003) Effectiveness of Roux-en-Y reconstruction after distal gastrectomy based on an assessment of biliary kinetics. Surg Today 33:169–177
Nunobe S, Okaro A, Sasako M et al (2007) Billroth 1 versus Roux-en-Y reconstructions: a quality-of-life survey at 5 years. Int J Clin Oncol 12:433–439
Piessen G, Triboulet J-P, Mariette C (2010) Reconstruction after gastrectomy: which technique is best? J Visc Surg 147:e273–e283
Lee M-S, Ahn S-H, Lee J-H et al (2012) What is the best reconstruction method after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer? Surg Endosc 26:1539–1547
Vogel SB, Drane WE, Woodward ER (1994) Clinical and radionuclide evaluation of bile diversion by Braun enteroenterostomy: prevention and treatment of alkaline reflux gastritis. Ann Surg 219:459–465
Cui LH, Son SY, Shin HJ et al (2017) Billroth II with Braun Enteroenterostomy Is a Good Alternative Reconstruction to Roux-en-Y Gastrojejunostomy in Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy. Gastroenterol Res Pract 180:38–51
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by a grant of the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI) and funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (Grant Number: HC17C0050).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
268_2019_4943_MOESM2_ESM.tif
Supplementary Fig. 1 Forest plot comparing operation time for laparoscopic distal gastrectomy. a. Billroth I versus Roux-en Y, b. Billroth II versus Roux-en Y, and c Billroth I versus Billroth II. An inverse variance random-effects model (a, b) and fixed-effect model(c) were used for meta-analysis. (TIFF 10702 kb)
268_2019_4943_MOESM3_ESM.tif
Supplementary Fig. 2 Forest plot comparing remnant gastritis after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy. a. Billroth I versus Roux-en Y, b. Billroth II versus Roux-en Y, and c. Billroth I versus Billroth II. A Mantel–Haenszel random-effects model was used for meta-analysis. (TIFF 8311 kb)
268_2019_4943_MOESM4_ESM.tif
Supplementary Fig. 3 Forest plot comparing bile reflux after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy. a. Billroth I versus Roux-en Y, b. Billroth II versus Roux-en Y, and c. Billroth I versus Billroth II. A Mantel–Haenszel random-effects model (b) and fixed-effect model (a, c) were used for meta-analysis. (TIFF 8063 kb)
268_2019_4943_MOESM5_ESM.tif
Supplementary Fig. 4 Forest plot comparing reflux esophagitis after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy. a. Billroth I versus Roux-en Y and b. Billroth II versus Roux-en Y. A Mantel–Haenszel fixed-effect model (a) and random-effects model (b) were used for meta-analysis. (TIFF 4819 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, M.S., Kwon, Y., Park, E.P. et al. Revisiting Laparoscopic Reconstruction for Billroth 1 Versus Billroth 2 Versus Roux-en-Y After Distal Gastrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis in the Modern Era. World J Surg 43, 1581–1593 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-019-04943-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-019-04943-x