Abstract
Introduction
Transvaginal hybrid NOTES cholecystectomy is an alternative approach to the traditional laparoscopic technique. Despite increasing data regarding clinical outcomes following transvaginal hybrid NOTES cholecystectomy, there is still a lack of long-term results, particularly with regard to sexual function. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate long-term outcome of a series of transvaginal hybrid cholecystectomy.
Patients and methods
Female patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis who underwent transvaginal hybrid NOTES cholecystectomy were retrospectively analysed regarding clinical and surgical outcome parameters. Furthermore, all patients received a 17-question survey postoperative with questions about sexual intercourse, the domains satisfaction and pain of the German Female Sexual Function Index.
Results
Overall, 47 of 80 patients were included in the study with a completed survey responses (return rate 58.6%), with a mean age of 48 years, mean body mass index of 29 and mean operative time of 47 min. The median follow-up was 40 months. There were no intra- or postoperative complications and no conversion to a laparoscopic or open approach. No significant differences were found for postoperative sexual function (painful intercourse, inability to achieve orgasm), although sexual intercourse was less frequent postoperatively (p = 0.022). Forty-four patients (93.7%) were satisfied with the aesthetic and the overall postoperative result, and 40 patients (85.1%) would recommend the applied surgical technique to friends and family.
Conclusion
The findings show that transvaginal hybrid NOTES cholecystectomy is a safe procedure for female patients, particularly with regard to sexual function.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lehmann KS, Ritz JP, Wibmer A, Gellert K, Zornig C, Burghardt J, Busing M, Runkel N, Kohlhaw K, Albrecht R, Kirchner TG, Arlt G, Mall JW, Butters M, Bulian DR, Bretschneider J, Holmer C, Buhr HJ (2010) The German registry for natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery: report of the first 551 patients. Ann Surg 252(2):263–270
Arezzo A, Zornig C, Mofid H, Fuchs KH, Breithaupt W, Noguera J, Kaehler G, Magdeburg R, Perretta S, Dallemagne B, Marescaux J, Copaescu C, Graur F, Szasz A, Forgione A, Pugliese R, Buess G, Bhattacharjee HK, Navarra G, Godina M, Shishin K, Morino M (2013) The EURO-NOTES clinical registry for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: a 2-year activity report. Surg Endosc 27(9):3073–3084
Marescaux J, Dallemagne B, Perretta S, Wattiez A, Mutter D, Coumaros D (2007) Surgery without scars: report of transluminal cholecystectomy in a human being. Arch Surg 142(9):823–826
Delvaux G, Devroey P, De Waele B, Willems G (1993) Transvaginal removal of gallbladders with large stones after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 3(4):307–309
Nijhawan S, Barajas-Gamboa JS, Majid S, Jacobsen GR, Sedrak MF, Sandler BJ, Talamini MA, Horgan S (2013) NOTES transvaginal hybrid cholecystectomy: the United States human experience. Surg Endosc 27(2):514–517
Bulian DR, Knuth J, Cerasani N, Sauerwald A, Heiss MM (2015) Transvaginal/transumbilical hybrid-NOTES-versus 3-trocar needlescopic cholecystectomy: short-term results of a randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg 261(3):451–458
Bulian DR, Trump L, Knuth J, Siegel R, Sauerwald A, Strohlein MA, Heiss MM (2013) Less pain after transvaginal/transumbilical cholecystectomy than after the classical laparoscopic technique: short-term results of a matched-cohort study. Surg Endosc 27(2):580–586
Bulian DR, Trump L, Knuth J, Cerasani N, Heiss MM (2013) Longterm results of transvaginal/transumbilical versus classical laparoscopiccholecystectomy—an analysis of 88 patients. Langenbecks Arch Surg 398(4):571–579
Donatsky AM, Jørgensen LN, Meisner S, Vilmann P, Rosenberg J (2014) Sexual function after transvaginal cholecystectomy: a systematic review. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutaneous Tech 24(4):290–295
Zornig C, Emmermann A, von Waldenfels HA, Mofid H (2007) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy without visible scar: combined transvaginal and transumbilical approach. Endoscopy 39(10):913–915
Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, Leiblum S, Meston C, Shabsigh R, Ferguson D, D’Agostino R Jr. (2000) The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther 26(2):191–208
Berner MM, Kriston L, Zahradnik HP, Härter M, Rohde A (2004) Validity and reliability of the German Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI-d). Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 64:293–303
Federlein M, Muller VA, Fritze-Buttner F, Burghardt J, Graber S, Gellert K, Borchert DH (2014) Transvaginal cholecystectomy: results of a randomized study. Der Chirurg 85:825–832
Hackethal A, Sucke J, Oehmke F, Munstedt K, Padberg W, Tinneberg HR (2010) Establishing transvaginal NOTES for gynecological and surgical indications: benefits, limits, and patient experience. Endoscopy 42:875–878
Linke GR, Luz S, Janczak J, Zerz A, Schmied BM, Siercks I, Warschkow R, Beutner U, Tarantino I (2013) Evaluation of sexual function in sexually active women 1 year after transvaginal NOTES: a prospective cohort study of 106 patients. Langenbecks Arch Surg 398:139–145
Niu J, Song W, Yan M, Fan W, Niu W, Liu E, Peng C, Lin P, Li P, Khan AQ (2011) Transvaginal laparoscopically assisted endoscopic cholecystectomy: preliminary clinical results for a series of 43 cases in China. Surg Endosc 25:1281–1286
van den Boezem PB, Velthuis S, Lourens HJ, Samlal RA, Cuesta MA, Sietses C (2013) Hybrid transvaginal cholecystectomy, clinical results and patient-reported outcomes of 50 consecutive cases. J Gastrointest Surg 17:907–912
van den Boezem PB, Velthuis S, Lourens HJ, Cuesta MA, Sietses C (2014) Single-incision and NOTES cholecystectomy, are there clinical or cosmetic advantages when compared to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy? A case–control study comparing single-incision, transvaginal, and conventional laparoscopic technique for cholecystectomy. World J Surg 38:25–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2221-4
Bulian DR, Knuth J, Lehmann KS, Sauerwald A, Heiss MM (2015) Systematic analysis of the safety and benefits of transvaginal hybrid-NOTES cholecystectomy. World J Gastroenterol 21:10915–10925
Peng C, Ling Y, Ma C, Ma X, Fan W, Niu W, Niu J (2016) Safety outcomes of NOTES cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutaneous Tech 26(5):347–353
Borchert D, Federlein M, Ruckbeil O, Burghardt J, Fritze F, Gellert K (2012) Prospective evaluation of transvaginal assisted cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 26:3597–3604
Noguera JF, Cuadrado A, Dolz C, Olea JM, Garcia JC (2012) Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and hybrid natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). Surg Endosc 26:3435–3441
Mofid H, Emmermann A, Alm M, von Waldenfels HA, Felixmuller C, Zornig C (2013) Is the transvaginal route appropriate for intra-abdominal NOTES procedures? Experience and follow-up of 222 cases. Surg Endosc 27:2807–2812
Tarantino I, Linke GR, Lange J, Siercks I, Warschkow R, Zerz A (2011) Transvaginal rigid-hybrid natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery technique for anterior resection treatment of diverticulitis: a feasibility study. Surg Endosc 25:3034–3042
Horgan S, Meireles OR, Jacobsen GR, Sandler BJ, Ferreres A, Ramamoorthy S, Savides T, Katagiri T, Dotai T, Sedrak M, Majid SF, Nijhawan S, Talamini MA (2013) Broad clinical utilization of NOTES: is it safe? Surg Endosc 27:1872–1880
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
U. Pohlen and other co-authors have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pohlen, U., Feller, A. & Holmer, C. Transvaginal Hybrid NOTES Cholecystectomy: A Single-Centre Long-Term Experience on Sexual Function. World J Surg 42, 1960–1964 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-4412-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-4412-x