Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Transvaginal Hybrid NOTES Cholecystectomy: A Single-Centre Long-Term Experience on Sexual Function

  • Original Scientific Report
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Transvaginal hybrid NOTES cholecystectomy is an alternative approach to the traditional laparoscopic technique. Despite increasing data regarding clinical outcomes following transvaginal hybrid NOTES cholecystectomy, there is still a lack of long-term results, particularly with regard to sexual function. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate long-term outcome of a series of transvaginal hybrid cholecystectomy.

Patients and methods

Female patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis who underwent transvaginal hybrid NOTES cholecystectomy were retrospectively analysed regarding clinical and surgical outcome parameters. Furthermore, all patients received a 17-question survey postoperative with questions about sexual intercourse, the domains satisfaction and pain of the German Female Sexual Function Index.

Results

Overall, 47 of 80 patients were included in the study with a completed survey responses (return rate 58.6%), with a mean age of 48 years, mean body mass index of 29 and mean operative time of 47 min. The median follow-up was 40 months. There were no intra- or postoperative complications and no conversion to a laparoscopic or open approach. No significant differences were found for postoperative sexual function (painful intercourse, inability to achieve orgasm), although sexual intercourse was less frequent postoperatively (p = 0.022). Forty-four patients (93.7%) were satisfied with the aesthetic and the overall postoperative result, and 40 patients (85.1%) would recommend the applied surgical technique to friends and family.

Conclusion

The findings show that transvaginal hybrid NOTES cholecystectomy is a safe procedure for female patients, particularly with regard to sexual function.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lehmann KS, Ritz JP, Wibmer A, Gellert K, Zornig C, Burghardt J, Busing M, Runkel N, Kohlhaw K, Albrecht R, Kirchner TG, Arlt G, Mall JW, Butters M, Bulian DR, Bretschneider J, Holmer C, Buhr HJ (2010) The German registry for natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery: report of the first 551 patients. Ann Surg 252(2):263–270

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Arezzo A, Zornig C, Mofid H, Fuchs KH, Breithaupt W, Noguera J, Kaehler G, Magdeburg R, Perretta S, Dallemagne B, Marescaux J, Copaescu C, Graur F, Szasz A, Forgione A, Pugliese R, Buess G, Bhattacharjee HK, Navarra G, Godina M, Shishin K, Morino M (2013) The EURO-NOTES clinical registry for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: a 2-year activity report. Surg Endosc 27(9):3073–3084

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Marescaux J, Dallemagne B, Perretta S, Wattiez A, Mutter D, Coumaros D (2007) Surgery without scars: report of transluminal cholecystectomy in a human being. Arch Surg 142(9):823–826

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Delvaux G, Devroey P, De Waele B, Willems G (1993) Transvaginal removal of gallbladders with large stones after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 3(4):307–309

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Nijhawan S, Barajas-Gamboa JS, Majid S, Jacobsen GR, Sedrak MF, Sandler BJ, Talamini MA, Horgan S (2013) NOTES transvaginal hybrid cholecystectomy: the United States human experience. Surg Endosc 27(2):514–517

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bulian DR, Knuth J, Cerasani N, Sauerwald A, Heiss MM (2015) Transvaginal/transumbilical hybrid-NOTES-versus 3-trocar needlescopic cholecystectomy: short-term results of a randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg 261(3):451–458

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Bulian DR, Trump L, Knuth J, Siegel R, Sauerwald A, Strohlein MA, Heiss MM (2013) Less pain after transvaginal/transumbilical cholecystectomy than after the classical laparoscopic technique: short-term results of a matched-cohort study. Surg Endosc 27(2):580–586

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bulian DR, Trump L, Knuth J, Cerasani N, Heiss MM (2013) Longterm results of transvaginal/transumbilical versus classical laparoscopiccholecystectomy—an analysis of 88 patients. Langenbecks Arch Surg 398(4):571–579

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Donatsky AM, Jørgensen LN, Meisner S, Vilmann P, Rosenberg J (2014) Sexual function after transvaginal cholecystectomy: a systematic review. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutaneous Tech 24(4):290–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zornig C, Emmermann A, von Waldenfels HA, Mofid H (2007) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy without visible scar: combined transvaginal and transumbilical approach. Endoscopy 39(10):913–915

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, Leiblum S, Meston C, Shabsigh R, Ferguson D, D’Agostino R Jr. (2000) The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther 26(2):191–208

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Berner MM, Kriston L, Zahradnik HP, Härter M, Rohde A (2004) Validity and reliability of the German Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI-d). Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 64:293–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Federlein M, Muller VA, Fritze-Buttner F, Burghardt J, Graber S, Gellert K, Borchert DH (2014) Transvaginal cholecystectomy: results of a randomized study. Der Chirurg 85:825–832

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hackethal A, Sucke J, Oehmke F, Munstedt K, Padberg W, Tinneberg HR (2010) Establishing transvaginal NOTES for gynecological and surgical indications: benefits, limits, and patient experience. Endoscopy 42:875–878

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Linke GR, Luz S, Janczak J, Zerz A, Schmied BM, Siercks I, Warschkow R, Beutner U, Tarantino I (2013) Evaluation of sexual function in sexually active women 1 year after transvaginal NOTES: a prospective cohort study of 106 patients. Langenbecks Arch Surg 398:139–145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Niu J, Song W, Yan M, Fan W, Niu W, Liu E, Peng C, Lin P, Li P, Khan AQ (2011) Transvaginal laparoscopically assisted endoscopic cholecystectomy: preliminary clinical results for a series of 43 cases in China. Surg Endosc 25:1281–1286

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. van den Boezem PB, Velthuis S, Lourens HJ, Samlal RA, Cuesta MA, Sietses C (2013) Hybrid transvaginal cholecystectomy, clinical results and patient-reported outcomes of 50 consecutive cases. J Gastrointest Surg 17:907–912

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. van den Boezem PB, Velthuis S, Lourens HJ, Cuesta MA, Sietses C (2014) Single-incision and NOTES cholecystectomy, are there clinical or cosmetic advantages when compared to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy? A case–control study comparing single-incision, transvaginal, and conventional laparoscopic technique for cholecystectomy. World J Surg 38:25–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2221-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bulian DR, Knuth J, Lehmann KS, Sauerwald A, Heiss MM (2015) Systematic analysis of the safety and benefits of transvaginal hybrid-NOTES cholecystectomy. World J Gastroenterol 21:10915–10925

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Peng C, Ling Y, Ma C, Ma X, Fan W, Niu W, Niu J (2016) Safety outcomes of NOTES cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutaneous Tech 26(5):347–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Borchert D, Federlein M, Ruckbeil O, Burghardt J, Fritze F, Gellert K (2012) Prospective evaluation of transvaginal assisted cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 26:3597–3604

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Noguera JF, Cuadrado A, Dolz C, Olea JM, Garcia JC (2012) Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and hybrid natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). Surg Endosc 26:3435–3441

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mofid H, Emmermann A, Alm M, von Waldenfels HA, Felixmuller C, Zornig C (2013) Is the transvaginal route appropriate for intra-abdominal NOTES procedures? Experience and follow-up of 222 cases. Surg Endosc 27:2807–2812

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tarantino I, Linke GR, Lange J, Siercks I, Warschkow R, Zerz A (2011) Transvaginal rigid-hybrid natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery technique for anterior resection treatment of diverticulitis: a feasibility study. Surg Endosc 25:3034–3042

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Horgan S, Meireles OR, Jacobsen GR, Sandler BJ, Ferreres A, Ramamoorthy S, Savides T, Katagiri T, Dotai T, Sedrak M, Majid SF, Nijhawan S, Talamini MA (2013) Broad clinical utilization of NOTES: is it safe? Surg Endosc 27:1872–1880

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Holmer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

U. Pohlen and other co-authors have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pohlen, U., Feller, A. & Holmer, C. Transvaginal Hybrid NOTES Cholecystectomy: A Single-Centre Long-Term Experience on Sexual Function. World J Surg 42, 1960–1964 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-4412-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-4412-x

Navigation