Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Robot-Assisted Transaxillary Thyroidectomy (RATT): A Series Appraisal of More than 250 Cases from Europe

  • Original Scientific Report
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Robot-assisted transaxillary thyroidectomy (RATT) is widely accepted in Asian countries. However, concerns regarding the balance between its real advantages and safety and cost have been raised by North American authorities. In Europe, assessments have been limited by small numbers since now. The purpose here is to report a large European experience with RATT.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted of 257 patients who underwent RATT for nodular disease between February 2012 and September 2016. Data collected included patient demographics, diagnosis, ultrasound-estimated mean thyroid volume and nodule size, type of resection, operative time, postoperative pain and morbidity, and the hospital length of stay. Pain was assessed by visual analog scale score 12 h postoperatively (on the first postoperative day, before discharge). Feasibility, effectiveness, and safety were the outcomes of interest. Follow-up of thyroid carcinoma patients was carried out measuring thyroglobulin levels and ultrasound examination (median follow-up 24 months (6–48 months)). First control after 12 months and successively once a year.

Results

There were 253 women and 4 men, with a mean age of 37.3 years. Indications included benign disease in 116, papillary carcinoma in 56, and indeterminate nodule in 85. Mean thyroid volume was 16.8 mL, and nodule size was 25.3 mm. A hemithyroidectomy was performed in 138 patients and total thyroidectomy in 118. The mean operative time was 77.5 min for the former and 99.7 min for the latter. One conversion was required. Complications included transient hypoparathyroidism in 7/118 (total thyroidectomy) patients (5.9%), transient vocal fold palsy in 3/257 (1.1%), 1 delayed tracheal injury (0.4%), and 3 postoperative hematoma (1.1%). Mean visual analog scale score was 1.79, and the mean length of stay was 1.6 days for hemithyroidectomy and 1.9 days for total thyroidectomy.

Conclusion

RATT is safe and effective and could serve as a viable treatment modality in selected cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Miccoli P, Biricotti M, Matteucci V, Ambrosini CE, Wu J, Materazzi G (2016) Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy: reflections after more than 2400 cases performed. Surg Endosc 30(6):2489–2495

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bomeli SR, Duke WS, Terris DJ (2015) Robotic facelift thyroid surgery. Gland Surg 4(5):403–409

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Bae DS, Suh BJ, Park JK, Koo DH (2016) Technical, oncological, and functional safety of bilateral axillo-breast approach (BABA) robotic total thyroidectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 26(3):253–258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Anuwong A (2016) Transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach: a series of the first 60 human cases. World J Surg 40(3):491–497. doi:10.1007/s00268-015-3320-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Huang JK, Ma L, Song WH, Lu BY, Huang YB, Dong HM (2016) Quality of life and cosmetic result of single-port access endoscopic thyroidectomy via axillary approach in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma. Onco Targets Ther 9:4053–4059

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Kang SW, Jeong JJ, Yun JS, Sung TY, Lee SC, Lee YS, Nam KH, Chang HS, Chung WY, Park CS (2009) Robot-assisted endoscopic surgery for thyroid cancer: experience with the first 100 patients. Surg Endosc 23:2399–2406

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sun GH, Peress L, Pynnonen MA (2014) Systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic vs. conventional thyroidectomy approaches for thyroid disease. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 150:520–532

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Perrier ND (2012) Why i have abandoned robot-assisted transaxillary thyroid surgery. Surgery 152:1025–1026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Inabnet WB 3rd (2012) Robotic thyroidectomy: must we drive a luxury sedan to arrive at our destination safely? Thyroid 22:988–990

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Shaha AR (2015) Transaxillary thyroidectomy—a critical appraisal. J Surg Oncol 111:131–132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. American Thyroid Association (ATA) Guidelines Taskforce on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer, Cooper DS, Doherty GM, Haugen BR, Kloos RT, Lee SL, Mandel SJ, Mazzaferri EL, McIver B, Pacini F, Schlumberger M, Sherman SI, Steward DL, Tuttle RM (2009) Revised American Thyroid Association management guidelines for patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid 19:1167–1214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Haugen BR, Alexander EK, Bible KC, Doherty GM, Mandel SJ, Nikiforov YE, Pacini F, Randolph GW, Sawka AM, Schlumberger M, Schuff KG, Sherman SI, Sosa JA, Steward DL, Tuttle RM, Wartofsky L (2016) 2015 American Thyroid Association management guidelines for adult patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer: the American Thyroid Association guidelines task force on thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid 26:1–133

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Ikeda Y, Takami H, Niimi M, Kan S, Sasaki Y, Takayama J (2002) Endoscopic thyroidectomy and parathyroidectomy by the axillary approach. Surg Endosc 16:92–95

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bakkar S, Frustaci G, Papini P, Fregoli L, Matteucci V, Materazzi G, Miccoli P (2016) Track recurrence after robotic transaxillary thyroidectomy: a case report highlighting the importance of controlled surgical indications and addressing unprecedented complications. Thyroid 26:559–561

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Materazzi G, Fregoli L, Manzini G, Baggiani A, Miccoli M, Miccoli P (2014) Cosmetic result and overall satisfaction after minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) versus robot-assisted transaxillary thyroidectomy (RATT): a prospective randomized study. World J Surg 38:1282–1288. doi:10.1007/s00268-014-2483-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee S, Park S, Lee CR, Son H, Kim J, Kang SW, Jeong JJ, Nam KH, Chung WY, Park CS (2013) The impact of body habitus on the surgical outcomes of transaxillary single-incision robotic thyroidectomy in papillary thyroid carcinoma patients. Surg Endosc 27:2407–2414

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Berber E, Bernet V, Fahey TJ, Kebebew E, Shaha A, Stack BC, Stang M, Steward L, Terris DJ (2016) American Thyroid Association statement on remote-access thyroid surgery. Thyroid 26:331–337

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Bakkar S, Materazzi G, Biricotti M, De Napoli L, Conte M, Galleri D et al (2016) Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) from A to Z. Surg Today 46:255–259

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kuppersmith RB, Holsinger FC (2011) Robotic thyroid surgery: an initial experience with North American patients. Laryngoscope 121:521–526

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kang SW, Lee SC, Lee SH, Lee KY, Jeong JJ, Lee YS, Nam KH, Chang HS, Chung WY, Park CS (2009) Robotic thyroid surgery using a gasless, transaxillary approach and the da Vinci S system: the operative outcomes of 338 consecutive patients. Surgery 146:1048–1055

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Materazzi G, Fregoli L, Ribechini A, Miccoli P (2013) Conservative management of a tracheal leakage occurring 40 days after robotic thyroidectomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 149:793–794

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fregoli L, Materazzi G, Miccoli M, Papini P, Guarino G, Wu HS, Miccoli P (2017) Postoperative pain evaluation after robotic transaxillary thyroidectomy versus conventional thyroidectomy: a prospective study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 27(2):146–150

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgical Pathology, Medical, Molecular and Critical Area, University of Pisa, Via Paradisa 2, Pisa, Italy

    Gabriele Materazzi, Lorenzo Fregoli, Piermarco Papini, Sohail Bakkar, Malince Chicas Vasquez & Paolo Miccoli

Authors
  1. Gabriele Materazzi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lorenzo Fregoli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Piermarco Papini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sohail Bakkar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Malince Chicas Vasquez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Paolo Miccoli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gabriele Materazzi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Materazzi, G., Fregoli, L., Papini, P. et al. Robot-Assisted Transaxillary Thyroidectomy (RATT): A Series Appraisal of More than 250 Cases from Europe. World J Surg 42, 1018–1023 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-4213-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-4213-2

Search

Navigation