Skip to main content
Log in

Perioperative Mortality Following Oesophagectomy and Pancreaticoduodenectomy in Australia

  • Original Scientific Report
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Oesophagectomy (OG) and pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) remain associated with significant perioperative mortality rates (POMR). Improved outcomes in high-volume centres have led to these procedures being centralised in some countries. This retrospective, population-based cohort study was conducted to determine the Australian national, and state and territory based POMR associated with OG and PD, and assess trends over time.

Methods

Logistic regression analysis was performed using de-identified procedural data between 1 July 2005 and 30 June 2013 from the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Codes relating to OG and PD contained in the Australian Classification of Health Interventions were used to extract patient data. Mortality rates were risk adjusted for age, gender and urgency of admission. Temporal trends and differences between states/territories were investigated.

Results

The average Australian POMR throughout the study period was 3.5 and 3.0% for OG and PD, respectively. OG POMR showed no significant change over time (P = 0.30) or variation between states (P = 0.079). The annual POMR associated with PD, however, showed a significant decrease during the study period (P = 0.01) with variation in PD POMR outcomes evident amongst different regions (P = 0.0004).

Conclusion

This study demonstrates a comparable Australian PD and OG POMR when correlated with international studies. National PD POMR improved throughout the study with consistent improvement across the states and territories. This study does, however, show variation in PD POMR between states and territories. Potential intra-state variation merits further investigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Watters DA, Hollands MJ, Gruen RL et al (2015) Perioperative mortality rate (POMR): a global indicator of access to safe surgery and anaesthesia. World J Surg 39:856–864. doi:10.1007/s00268-014-2638-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bilimoria KY, Bentrem DJ, Feinglass JM et al (2008) Directing surgical quality improvement initiatives: comparison of perioperative mortality and long-term survival for cancer surgery. J Clin Oncol 26:4626–4633

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. de Wilde RF, Besselink MG, van der Tweel I et al (2012) Impact of nationwide centralization of pancreaticoduodenectomy on hospital mortality. Br J Surg 99:404–410

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Reames BN, Ghaferi AA, Birkmeyer JD et al (2014) Hospital volume and operative mortality in the modern era. Ann Surg 260:244–251

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Yoshioka R, Yasunaga H, Hasegawa K et al (2014) Impact of hospital volume on hospital mortality, length of stay and total costs after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 101:523–529

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cameron JL, He J (2015) Two thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. J Am Coll Surg 220:530–536

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dikken JL, van Sandick JW, Allum WH et al (2013) Differences in outcomes of oesophageal and gastric cancer surgery across Europe. Br J Surg 100:83–94

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Stewart GD, Long G, Tulloh BR (2006) Surgical service centralisation in Australia versus choice and quality of life for rural patients. Med J Aust 185:162–163

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Smith RC, Creighton N, Lord RV et al (2014) Survival, mortality and morbidity outcomes after oesophagogastric cancer surgery in New South Wales, 2001–2008. Med J Aust 200:408–413

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Messager M, de Steur WO, van Sandick JW et al (2016) Variations among 5 European countries for curative treatment of resectable oesophageal and gastric cancer: a survey from the EURECCA Upper GI Group (EUropean REgistration of Cancer CAre). Eur J Surg Oncol 42:116–122

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chadwick G, Cromwell D, Crosby T, Brand C, Groene O, Hardwick R, Maynard N, Riley S, Varagunam (2013) National Oesophago-Gastric Cancer Audit. 2013 National Report, The Royal College of Surgeons of England

  12. Speer AG, Thursfield VJ, Torn-Broers Y et al (2012) Pancreatic cancer: surgical management and outcomes after 6 years of follow-up. Med J Aust 196:511–515

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Newhook TE, LaPar DJ, Lindberg JM et al (2015) Morbidity and mortality of pancreaticoduodenectomy for benign and premalignant pancreatic neoplasms. J Gastrointest Surg 19:1072–1077

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Australian Demographics Statistics (2015) Australian Bureau of Statistics 2015. http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/3101.0. Accessed 15 July 2016

  15. Fedeli U, Schievano E, Lisiero M (2012) Mortality after esophageal and gastric cancer resection. World J Surg 36:2630–2636. doi:10.1007/s00268-012-1724-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Raju RS, Guy GS, Majid AJ et al (2015) The Australian and New Zealand Audit of Surgical Mortality-birth, deaths, and carriage. Ann Surg 261:304–308

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Azzam DG, Neo CA, Itotoh FE et al (2013) The Western Australian Audit of Surgical Mortality: outcomes from the first 10 years. Med J Aust 199:539–542

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. The Victorian Surgical Consultative Council - eBulletin, Victoria, 2014. http://docs2.health.vic.gov.au/docs/doc/6A6BA6F8660A6EF4CA257D930003F732/$FILE/VSCC%20October%20eBulletin.pdf. Accessed 15 July 2016

  19. Samra JS, Bachmann RA, Choi J et al (2011) One hundred and seventy-eight consecutive pancreatoduodenectomies without mortality: role of the multidisciplinary approach. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int HBPD INT 10:415–521

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funded by State Health Department and Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guy J. Maddern.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No conflict of interest to be disclosed.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Davis, S.S., Babidge, W.J., Kiermeier, A. et al. Perioperative Mortality Following Oesophagectomy and Pancreaticoduodenectomy in Australia. World J Surg 42, 742–748 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-4204-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-4204-3

Navigation