Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Impact of Anastomotic Leakage on Anal Function Following Intersphincteric Resection

  • Original Scientific Report
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Data regarding anastomotic leakage (AL) following intersphincteric resection (ISR) are lacking. We aimed to evaluate the effect of AL on anal function in a retrospective review of patients who developed AL following ISR.

Methods

We evaluated 341 consecutive patients who underwent ISR between 2000 and 2012. Patients were classified into three groups: anastomotic dehiscence (AD), major AL (Clavien–Dindo grade III+), or control (<grade III or no AL). Functional assessment was performed at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after defecation through the preserved anus, and the Wexner score was calculated.

Results

Among patients who underwent ISR for low rectal cancer (anal verge, 3.7 ± 1.3 cm), 59 (17%) developed AL. Of these, 13 patients were classified as AD and 36 as major AL. The rate of the 3-year stomal reversal was significantly lower in the major AL (78.6%) and AD groups (61.5%) than in the control group (88.7%; p < 0.01). Furthermore, the anastomotic stricture rate was higher in the AL and AD groups than in the controls (16.7 and 38.5 vs. 1.8%, respectively; p < 0.01). Wexner scores in the major AL group were poor during the early period, but were similar to the control group at the 2-year follow-up. In contrast, Wexner scores in the AD group remained high, even after 2 years.

Conclusions

Patients with major AL following ISR had poor anal function that recovered over 2 years, as long as AD was not present. These findings suggest that patients with major AL require a long-term follow-up for anal function.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Saito N, Sugito M, Ito M et al (2009) Oncologic outcome of intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer. World J Surg 33:1750–1756. doi:10.1007/s00268-009-0079-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Martin ST, Heneghan HM, Winter DC (2012) Systematic review of outcomes after intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. Br J Surg 99:603–612

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ito M, Saito N, Sugito M et al (2009) Analysis of clinical factors associated with anal function after intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 52:64–70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Saito N, Ito M, Kobayashi A et al (2014) Long-term outcomes after intersphincteric resection for low-lying rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 21:3608–3615

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Choi HK, Law WL, Ho JW (2006) Leakage after resection and intraperitoneal anastomosis for colorectal malignancy: analysis of risk factors. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1719–1725

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ptok H, Marusch F, Meyer F et al (2007) Impact of anastomotic leakage on oncological outcome after rectal cancer resection. Br J Surg 94:1548–1554

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mirnezami A, Mirnezami R, Chandrakumaran K et al (2011) Increased local recurrence and reduced survival from colorectal cancer following anastomotic leak: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 253:890–899

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Saito N, Ono M, Sugito M et al (2004) Early results of intersphincteric resection for patients with very low rectal cancer: an active approach to avoid a permanent colostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 47:459–466

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Saito N, Moriya Y, Shirouzu K et al (2006) Intersphincteric resection in patients with very low rectal cancer: a review of the Japanese experience. Dis Colon Rectum 49:S13–S22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Osera S, Ikematsu H, Odagaki T et al (2015) Efficacy and safety of endoscopic radial incision and cutting for benign severe anastomotic stricture after surgery for lower rectal cancer (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 81:770–773

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Denost Q, Laurent C, Capdepont M et al (2011) Risk factors for fecal incontinence after intersphincteric resection for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 54:963–968

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nesbakken A, Nygaard K, Lunde OC (2001) Outcome and late functional results after anastomotic leakage following mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 88:400–404

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hallbook O, Sjodahl R (1996) Anastomotic leakage and functional outcome after anterior resection of the rectum. Br J Surg 83:60–62

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bittorf B, Stadelmaier U, Merkel S et al (2003) Does anastomotic leakage affect functional outcome after rectal resection for cancer? Langenbecks Arch Surg 387:406–410

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Carmona JA, Ortiz H, Perez-Cabanas I (1991) Alterations in anorectal function after anterior resection for cancer of the rectum. Int J Colorectal Dis 6:108–110

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jorge JM, Wexner SD (1993) Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 36:77–97

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Devroede G, Vobecky S, Masse S et al (1982) Ischemic fecal incontinence and rectal angina. Gastroenterology 83:970–980

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rajasekaran MR, Sinha S, Seo Y et al (2014) Myoarchitectural and functional alterations in rabbit external anal sphincter muscle following experimental surgical trauma. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 307:G445–G451

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ashburn JH, Stocchi L, Kiran RP et al (2013) Consequences of anastomotic leak after restorative proctectomy for cancer: effect on long-term function and quality of life. Dis Colon Rectum 56:275–280

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rullier E, Laurent C, Garrelon JL et al (1998) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 85:355–358

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kim JS, Cho SY, Min BS et al (2009) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic intracorporeal colorectal anastomosis with a double stapling technique. J Am Coll Surg 209:694–701

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Eriksen MT, Wibe A, Norstein J et al (2005) Anastomotic leakage following routine mesorectal excision for rectal cancer in a national cohort of patients. Colorectal Dis 7:51–57

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ito M, Sugito M, Kobayashi A et al (2008) Relationship between multiple numbers of stapler firings during rectal division and anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic rectal resection. Int J Colorectal Dis 23:703–707

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Akasu T, Takawa M, Yamamoto S et al (2010) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage following intersphincteric resection for very low rectal adenocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg 14(1):104–111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Koyama M, Murata A, Sakamoto Y et al (2015) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after intersphincteric resection without a protective defunctioning stoma for lower rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 23:249–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Shiomi A, Ito M, Maeda K et al (2015) Effects of a diverting stoma on symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis of 1014 consecutive patients. J Am Coll Surg 220:186–194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Grant support for this study was provided by a National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund (25-A-8).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan

    Mitsuru Yokota, Masaaki Ito, Yuji Nishizawa, Akihiro Kobayashi & Norio Saito

Authors
  1. Mitsuru Yokota
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Masaaki Ito
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yuji Nishizawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Akihiro Kobayashi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Norio Saito
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masaaki Ito.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yokota, M., Ito, M., Nishizawa, Y. et al. The Impact of Anastomotic Leakage on Anal Function Following Intersphincteric Resection. World J Surg 41, 2168–2177 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-3960-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-3960-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation