Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Implementation of the World Health Organization Trauma Care Checklist Program in 11 Centers Across Multiple Economic Strata: Effect on Care Process Measures

  • Original Scientific Report
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Trauma contributes more than ten percent of the global burden of disease. Initial assessment and resuscitation of trauma patients often requires rapid diagnosis and management of multiple concurrent complex conditions, and errors are common. We investigated whether implementing a trauma care checklist would improve care for injured patients in low-, middle-, and high-income countries.

Methods

From 2010 to 2012, the impact of the World Health Organization (WHO) Trauma Care Checklist program was assessed in 11 hospitals using a stepped wedge pre- and post-intervention comparison with randomly assigned intervention start dates. Study sites represented nine countries with diverse economic and geographic contexts. Primary end points were adherence to process of care measures; secondary data on morbidity and mortality were also collected. Multilevel logistic regression models examined differences in measures pre- versus post-intervention, accounting for patient age, gender, injury severity, and center-specific variability.

Results

Data were collected on 1641 patients before and 1781 after program implementation. Patient age (mean 34 ± 18 vs. 34 ± 18), sex (21 vs. 22 % female), and the proportion of patients with injury severity scores (ISS) ≥ 25 (10 vs. 10 %) were similar before and after checklist implementation (p > 0.05). Improvement was found for 18 of 19 process measures, including greater odds of having abdominal examination (OR 3.26), chest auscultation (OR 2.68), and distal pulse examination (OR 2.33) (all p < 0.05). These changes were robust to several sensitivity analyses.

Conclusions

Implementation of the WHO Trauma Care Checklist was associated with substantial improvements in patient care process measures among a cohort of patients in diverse settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lozano R, Naghavi M, Foreman K et al (2012) Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 380:2095–2128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. MacKenzie EJ, Rivara FP, Jurkovich GJ et al (2006) A national evaluation of the effect of trauma-center care on mortality. N Engl J Med 354:366–378

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Peden MM, McGee K, Krug E (2002) Injury: a leading cause of the global burden of disease, 2000. World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mock C, Joshipura M, Arreola-Risa C, Quansah R (2012) An estimate of the number of lives that could be saved through improvements in trauma care globally. World J Surg 36:959–963

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mock C, Lormand J, Goosen J, Joshipura M, Peden M (2004) Guidelines for essential trauma care. World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  6. Leape LL, Woods DD, Hatlie MJ et al (1998) Promoting patient safety by preventing medical error. JAMA 280:1444–1447

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gruen RL, Jurkovich GJ, McIntyre LK et al (2006) Patterns of errors contributing to trauma mortality: lessons learned from 2594 deaths. Ann Surg 244:371–380

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Davis JW, Hoyt DB, McArdle MS et al (1992) An analysis of errors causing morbidity and mortality in a trauma system: a guide for quality improvement. J Trauma 32:660–665 discussion 665–666

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Oakley E, Stocker S, Staubli G, Young S (2006) Using video recording to identify management errors in pediatric trauma resuscitation. Pediatrics 117:658–664

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. McDermott FT, Cordner SM, Tremayne AB (1997) Management deficiencies and death preventability in 120 Victorian road fatalities (1993–1994). The Consultative Committee on road traffic fatalities in Victoria. Aust N Z J Surg 67:611–618

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fisher RB, Dearden CH (1990) Improving the care of patients with major trauma in the accident and emergency department. BMJ 300:1560–1563

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Ritchie PD, Cameron PA (1999) An evaluation of trauma team leader performance by video recording. Aust N Z J Surg 69:183–186

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Underhill TJ, Finlayson BJ (1989) A review of trauma deaths in an accident and emergency department. Arch Emerg Med 6:90–96

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Dearden CH, Rutherford WH (1985) The resuscitation of the severely injured in the accident and emergency department—a medical audit. Injury 16:249–252

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Houshian S, Larsen MS, Holm C (2002) Missed injuries in a level I trauma center. J Trauma 52:715–719

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pronovost P, Needham D, Berenholtz S et al (2006) An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU. N Engl J Med 355:2725–2732

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR et al (2009) A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med 360:491–499

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Spector JM, Agrawal P, Kodkany B et al (2012) Improving quality of care for maternal and newborn health: prospective pilot study of the WHO safe childbirth checklist program. PLoS One 7:e35151

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Arriaga AF, Bader AM, Wong JM et al (2013) Simulation-based trial of surgical-crisis checklists. N Engl J Med 368:246–253

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. de Vries EN, Prins HA, Crolla RMPH et al (2010) Effect of a comprehensive surgical safety system on patient outcomes. N Engl J Med 363:1928–1937

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Pronovost PJ, Berenholtz SM, Goeschel CA et al (2006) Creating high reliability in health care organizations. Health Serv Res 41:1599–1617

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Pronovost PJ, Berenholtz SM, Needham DM (2008) Translating evidence into practice: a model for large scale knowledge translation. BMJ 337:a1714

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gennarelli TA, Wodzin E (2008) Abbreviated injury scale 2005: update 2008. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine, Barrington, IL

    Google Scholar 

  24. Baker SP, O’Neill B, Haddon W, Long WB (1974) The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. J Trauma 14:187–196

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Weiser TG, Haynes AB, Lashoher A et al (2010) Perspectives in quality: designing the WHO surgical safety checklist. Int J Qual Health Care J Int Soc Qual Health Care ISQua 22:365–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Anderson DJ, Kaye KS, Classen D et al (2008) Strategies to prevent surgical site infections in acute care hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 29(Suppl 1):S51–S61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bratzler DW, Houck PM, Surgical Infection Prevention Guideline Writers Workgroup (2005) Antimicrobial prophylaxis for surgery: an advisory statement from the national surgical infection prevention project. Am J Surg 189:395–404

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lashoher A, Pronovost P (2010) Creating a more efficient healthcare knowledge market: using communities of practice to create checklists. Qual Saf Health Care 19:471–472

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Winters BD, Aswani MS, Pronovost PJ (2011) Commentary: reducing diagnostic errors: another role for checklists? Acad Med J Assoc Am Med Coll 86:279–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank those who assisted with the initial feasibility pilot testing of the checklist program.

Funding

Data collection at the low- and middle-income sites was funded by the AO Foundation and Second Assist. High-income sites funded data collection at their sites. The World Health Organization funded development of the checklist and checklist user training.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric B. Schneider.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lashoher, A., Schneider, E.B., Juillard, C. et al. Implementation of the World Health Organization Trauma Care Checklist Program in 11 Centers Across Multiple Economic Strata: Effect on Care Process Measures. World J Surg 41, 954–962 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3759-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3759-8

Keywords

Navigation