Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

TAPP or TEP for Recurrent Inguinal Hernia? Population-Based Analysis of Prospective Data on 1309 Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Repair for Recurrent Inguinal Hernia

  • Original Scientific Report
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Whether total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (TEP) is associated with worse outcomes compared to transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (TAPP) for the treatment of recurrent inguinal hernia continues to be a matter of debate. The objective of this large cohort study is to compare complications, conversion rates and postoperative length of hospital stay between patients undergoing TEP or TAPP for unilateral recurrent inguinal hernia repair.

Method

Based on prospective data of the Swiss Association of Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery, all patients who underwent elective TEP or TAPP for unilateral recurrent inguinal hernia between 1995 and 2006 were included. The following outcomes were compared: conversion rates, intraoperative complications, surgical postoperative complications and duration of operation.

Results

Data on 1309 patients undergoing TEP (n = 1022) and TAPP (n = 287) for recurrent inguinal hernia were prospectively collected. Average age, BMI and ASA score were similar in both groups. Patients undergoing TEP had a significantly increased rate of intraoperative complications (TEP 6.3 % vs. TAPP 2.8 %, p = 0.0225). Duration of operation was longer for patients undergoing TEP (TEP 80.3 vs. TAPP 73.0 min, p < 0.0023) while postoperative length of hospital stay was longer for patients undergoing TAPP (TEP 2.6 vs. TAPP 3.1 day, p = 0.0145). Surgical postoperative complications (TEP 3.52 % vs. TAPP 2.09 %, p = 0.2239), general postoperative complications (TEP 1.47 % vs. TAPP 0.7 %, p = 0.3081) and conversion rates (TEP 2.15 % vs. TAPP 1.39 %, p = 0.4155) were not significantly different.

Conclusion

This study is the first population-based analysis comparing outcomes of patients with recurrent inguinal hernia undergoing TEP versus TAPP in a prospective cohort of over 1300 patients. Intraoperative complications were significantly higher in patients undergoing TEP. The TEP technique was associated with longer operating times, but a shorter postoperative length of hospital stay. Nonetheless, the absolute outcome differences are small and thus, on a population-based level, both techniques appear to be safe and effective for patients undergoing endoscopic repair for unilateral recurrent inguinal hernia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rutkow IM (2003) Demographic and socioeconomic aspects of hernia repair in the United States in 2003. Surg Clin North Am 83:1045–1051

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Haapaniemi S, Gunnarsson U, Nordin P et al (2001) Reoperation after recurrent groin hernia repair. Ann Surg 234:122–126

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Gass M, Banz VM, Rosella L et al (2012) TAPP or TEP? Population-based analysis of prospective data on 4552 patients undergoing endoscopic inguinal hernia repair. World J Surg 36:2782–2786

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Zendejas B, Onkendi EO, Brahmbhatt RD et al (2011) Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repairs performed by supervised surgical trainees. Am J Surg 201(379–383):83–84

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wright D, O’Dwyer PJ (1998) The learning curve for laparoscopic hernia repair. Semin Laparosc Surg 5:227–232

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lal P, Kajla RK, Chander J et al (2004) Laparoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair: overcoming the learning curve. Surg Endosc 18:642–645

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gass M, Rosella L, Banz V et al (2012) Bilateral total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (TEP) has outcomes similar to those for unilateral TEP: population-based analysis of prospective data of 6505 patients. Surg Endosc 26:1364–1368

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tantia O, Jain M, Khanna S et al (2009) Laparoscopic repair of recurrent groin hernia: results of a prospective study. Surg Endosc 23:734–738

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pisanu A, Podda M, Saba A et al (2015) Meta-analysis and review of prospective randomized trials comparing laparoscopic and Lichtenstein techniques in recurrent inguinal hernia repair. Hernia 19:355–366

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Karthikesalingam A, Markar SR, Holt PJ et al (2010) Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic with open mesh repair of recurrent inguinal hernia. Br J Surg 97:4–11

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Shah NR, Mikami DJ, Cook C et al (2011) A comparison of outcomes between open and laparoscopic surgical repair of recurrent inguinal hernias. Surg Endosc 25:2330–2337

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Guller U, Rosella L, Karanicolas PJ et al (2010) Population-based trend analysis of 2813 patients undergoing laparoscopic sigmoid resection. Br J Surg 97:79–85

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Brugger L, Rosella L, Candinas D et al (2011) Improving outcomes after laparoscopic appendectomy: a population-based, 12-year trend analysis of 7446 patients. Ann Surg 253:309–313

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Laura Rosella and Prof. Dr. Ueli Güller for carefully reading the manuscript and making many valuable suggestions. This study was supported by grants from Johnson & Johnson and Covidien.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Cantonal Hospital of Lucerne, 6000, Lucerne, Switzerland

    M. Gass, A. Scheiwiller, M. Sykora & J. Metzger

Authors
  1. M. Gass
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Scheiwiller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. Sykora
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. J. Metzger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Gass.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Drs. Markus Gass, Andreas Scheiwiller, Martin Sykora and Jürg Metzger have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gass, M., Scheiwiller, A., Sykora, M. et al. TAPP or TEP for Recurrent Inguinal Hernia? Population-Based Analysis of Prospective Data on 1309 Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Repair for Recurrent Inguinal Hernia. World J Surg 40, 2348–2352 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3545-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3545-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation