Abstract
Background and objective
Debate continues concerning the oncological risk of nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) with immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) if the tumor-nipple distance (TND) is less than 2.0 cm. In this retrospective study, we analyzed oncological outcomes after NSM with IBR for the treatment of breast cancer to determine the risk posed by NSM in cases in which magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed a TND <2.0 cm but intraoperative frozen biopsy results were negative for tumor cells at the nipple base.
Materials and methods
We conducted a retrospective review of patients with breast cancer who underwent NSM with IBR at Samsung Medical Center between 2008 and 2014. Preoperative MRI was done in all cases to define the TND, and frozen biopsy specimens were obtained intraoperatively.
Results
Among the 266 NSMs performed, TND was <2.0 cm in 145 cases (54.5 %) and ≥2.0 cm in 121 cases (45.5 %). Median follow-up was 25.6 months. There were no significant differences between the two patient groups with respect to disease-free survival or local recurrence-free survival.
Conclusion
Our results suggest that NSM can be a feasible treatment option when the intraoperative frozen biopsy is negative for tumor cells even with a TND <2.0 cm in MRI.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A (2015) Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 65:87–108
Kummerow KL, Du L, Penson DF, Shyr Y, Hooks MA (2015) Nationwide trends in mastectomy for early-stage breast cancer. JAMA Surg 150:9–16
Toth BA, Lappert P (1991) Modified skin incisions for mastectomy: the need for plastic surgical input in preoperative planning. Plast Reconstr Surg 87:1048–1053
Elder EE, Brandberg Y, Bjorklund T, Rylander R, Lagergren J, Jurell G, Wickman M, Sandelin K (2005) Quality of life and patient satisfaction in breast cancer patients after immediate breast reconstruction: a prospective study. Breast 14:201–208
Stanec Z, Zic R, Budi S, Stanec S, Milanovic R, Vlajcic Z, Roje Z, Rudman F, Martic K, Held R, Bozo G (2014) Skin and nipple-areola complex sparing mastectomy in breast cancer patients: 15-year experience. Ann Plast Surg 73:485–491
Missana MC, Laurent I, Germain M, Lucas S, Barreau L (2013) Long-term oncological results after 400 skin-sparing mastectomies. J Visc Surg 150:313–320
Petit JY, Veronesi U, Orecchia R, Rey P, Martella S, Didier F, Viale G, Veronesi P, Luini A, Galimberti V et al (2009) Nipple sparing mastectomy with nipple areola intraoperative radiotherapy: one thousand and one cases of a five years experience at the European institute of oncology of Milan (EIO). Breast Cancer Res Treat 117:333–338
Coopey SB, Tang R, Lei L, Freer PE, Kansal K, Colwell AS, Gadd MA, Specht MC, Austen WG Jr, Smith BL (2013) Increasing eligibility for nipple-sparing mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 20:3218–3222
Poruk KE, Ying J, Chidester JR, Olson JR, Matsen CB, Neumayer L, Agarwal J (2015) Breast cancer recurrence after nipple-sparing mastectomy: one institution’s experience. Am J Surg 209:212–217
Freeman BS (1967) Complications of subcutaneous mastectomy with prosthetic replacement, immediate or delayed. South Med J 60:1277–1280
Simmons RM, Brennan M, Christos P, King V, Osborne M (2002) Analysis of nipple/areolar involvement with mastectomy: can the areola be preserved? Ann Surg Oncol 9:165–168
Laronga C, Kemp B, Johnston D, Robb GL, Singletary SE (1999) The incidence of occult nipple-areola complex involvement in breast cancer patients receiving a skin-sparing mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 6:609–613
Brachtel EF, Rusby JE, Michaelson JS, Chen LL, Muzikansky A, Smith BL, Koerner FC (2009) Occult nipple involvement in breast cancer: clinicopathologic findings in 316 consecutive mastectomy specimens. J Clin Oncol 27:4948–4954
Hartmann LC, Schaid DJ, Woods JE, Crotty TP, Myers JL, Arnold PG, Petty PM, Sellers TA, Johnson JL, McDonnell SK et al (1999) Efficacy of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy in women with a family history of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 340:77–84
Luo D, Ha J, Latham B, Ingram D, Connell T, Hastrich D, Yeow WC, Willsher P, Luo J (2010) The accuracy of intraoperative subareolar frozen section in nipple-sparing mastectomies. Ochsner J 10:188–192
Sacchini V, Pinotti JA, Barros AC, Luini A, Pluchinotta A, Pinotti M, Boratto MG, Ricci MD, Ruiz CA, Nisida AC et al (2006) Nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer and risk reduction: oncologic or technical problem? J Am Coll Surg 203:704–714
Gerber B, Krause A, Dieterich M, Kundt G, Reimer T (2009) The oncological safety of skin sparing mastectomy with conservation of the nipple-areola complex and autologous reconstruction: an extended follow-up study. Ann Surg 249:461–468
Petit JY, Veronesi U, Rey P, Rotmensz N, Botteri E, Rietjens M, Garusi C, De Lorenzi F, Martella S, Bosco R et al (2009) Nipple-sparing mastectomy: risk of nipple-areolar recurrences in a series of 579 cases. Breast Cancer Res Treat 114:97–101
Kim HJ, Park EH, Lim WS, Seo JY, Koh BS, Lee TJ, Eom JS, Lee SW, Son BH, Lee JW, Ahn SH (2010) Nipple areola skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap reconstruction is an oncologically safe procedure: a single center study. Ann Surg 251:493–498
Paepke S, Schmid R, Fleckner S, Paepke D, Niemeyer M, Schmalfeldt B, Jacobs VR, Kiechle M (2009) Subcutaneous mastectomy with conservation of the nipple-areola skin: broadening the indications. Ann Surg 250:288–292
Jensen JA, Orringer JS, Giuliano AE (2011) Nipple-sparing mastectomy in 99 patients with a mean follow-up of 5 years. Ann Surg Oncol 18:1665–1670
Warren Peled A, Foster RD, Stover AC, Itakura K, Ewing CA, Alvarado M, Hwang ES, Esserman LJ (2012) Outcomes after total skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction in 657 breasts. Ann Surg Oncol 19:3402–3409
Sakurai T, Zhang N, Suzuma T, Umemura T, Yoshimura G, Sakurai T, Yang Q (2013) Long-term follow-up of nipple-sparing mastectomy without radiotherapy: a single center study at a Japanese institution. Med Oncol 30:481
Adam H, Bygdeson M, de Boniface J (2014) The oncological safety of nipple-sparing mastectomy—a Swedish matched cohort study. Eur J Surg Oncol 40:1209–1215
Rusby JE, Brachtel EF, Othus M, Michaelson JS, Koerner FC, Smith BL (2008) Development and validation of a model predictive of occult nipple involvement in women undergoing mastectomy. Br J Surg 95:1356–1361
Byon W, Kim E, Kwon J, Park YL, Park C (2014) Magnetic resonance imaging and clinicopathological factors for the detection of occult nipple involvement in breast cancer patients. J Breast Cancer 17:386–392
Eriksen C, Frisell J, Wickman M, Lidbrink E, Krawiec K, Sandelin K (2011) Immediate reconstruction with implants in women with invasive breast cancer does not affect oncological safety in a matched cohort study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 127:439–446
de Alcantara Filho P, Capko D, Barry JM, Morrow M, Pusic A, Sacchini VS (2011) Nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer and risk-reducing surgery: the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center experience. Ann Surg Oncol 18:3117–3122
Steen ST, Chung AP, Han SH, Vinstein AL, Yoon JL, Giuliano AE (2013) Predicting nipple-areolar involvement using preoperative breast MRI and primary tumor characteristics. Ann Surg Oncol 20:633–639
Yao K, Liederbach E, Tang R, Lei L, Czechura T, Sisco M, Howard M, Hulick PJ, Weissman S, Winchester DJ et al (2015) Nipple-sparing mastectomy in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers: an interim analysis and review of the literature. Ann Surg Oncol 22:370–376
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ryu, J.M., Nam, S.J., Kim, S.W. et al. Feasibility of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Breast Reconstruction in Breast Cancer Patients with Tumor-Nipple Distance Less Than 2.0 cm. World J Surg 40, 2028–2035 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3487-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3487-0