Skip to main content
Log in

Feasibility of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Breast Reconstruction in Breast Cancer Patients with Tumor-Nipple Distance Less Than 2.0 cm

  • Original Scientific Report
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and objective

Debate continues concerning the oncological risk of nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) with immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) if the tumor-nipple distance (TND) is less than 2.0 cm. In this retrospective study, we analyzed oncological outcomes after NSM with IBR for the treatment of breast cancer to determine the risk posed by NSM in cases in which magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed a TND <2.0 cm but intraoperative frozen biopsy results were negative for tumor cells at the nipple base.

Materials and methods

We conducted a retrospective review of patients with breast cancer who underwent NSM with IBR at Samsung Medical Center between 2008 and 2014. Preoperative MRI was done in all cases to define the TND, and frozen biopsy specimens were obtained intraoperatively.

Results

Among the 266 NSMs performed, TND was <2.0 cm in 145 cases (54.5 %) and ≥2.0 cm in 121 cases (45.5 %). Median follow-up was 25.6 months. There were no significant differences between the two patient groups with respect to disease-free survival or local recurrence-free survival.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that NSM can be a feasible treatment option when the intraoperative frozen biopsy is negative for tumor cells even with a TND <2.0 cm in MRI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A (2015) Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 65:87–108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kummerow KL, Du L, Penson DF, Shyr Y, Hooks MA (2015) Nationwide trends in mastectomy for early-stage breast cancer. JAMA Surg 150:9–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Toth BA, Lappert P (1991) Modified skin incisions for mastectomy: the need for plastic surgical input in preoperative planning. Plast Reconstr Surg 87:1048–1053

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Elder EE, Brandberg Y, Bjorklund T, Rylander R, Lagergren J, Jurell G, Wickman M, Sandelin K (2005) Quality of life and patient satisfaction in breast cancer patients after immediate breast reconstruction: a prospective study. Breast 14:201–208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Stanec Z, Zic R, Budi S, Stanec S, Milanovic R, Vlajcic Z, Roje Z, Rudman F, Martic K, Held R, Bozo G (2014) Skin and nipple-areola complex sparing mastectomy in breast cancer patients: 15-year experience. Ann Plast Surg 73:485–491

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Missana MC, Laurent I, Germain M, Lucas S, Barreau L (2013) Long-term oncological results after 400 skin-sparing mastectomies. J Visc Surg 150:313–320

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Petit JY, Veronesi U, Orecchia R, Rey P, Martella S, Didier F, Viale G, Veronesi P, Luini A, Galimberti V et al (2009) Nipple sparing mastectomy with nipple areola intraoperative radiotherapy: one thousand and one cases of a five years experience at the European institute of oncology of Milan (EIO). Breast Cancer Res Treat 117:333–338

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Coopey SB, Tang R, Lei L, Freer PE, Kansal K, Colwell AS, Gadd MA, Specht MC, Austen WG Jr, Smith BL (2013) Increasing eligibility for nipple-sparing mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 20:3218–3222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Poruk KE, Ying J, Chidester JR, Olson JR, Matsen CB, Neumayer L, Agarwal J (2015) Breast cancer recurrence after nipple-sparing mastectomy: one institution’s experience. Am J Surg 209:212–217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Freeman BS (1967) Complications of subcutaneous mastectomy with prosthetic replacement, immediate or delayed. South Med J 60:1277–1280

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Simmons RM, Brennan M, Christos P, King V, Osborne M (2002) Analysis of nipple/areolar involvement with mastectomy: can the areola be preserved? Ann Surg Oncol 9:165–168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Laronga C, Kemp B, Johnston D, Robb GL, Singletary SE (1999) The incidence of occult nipple-areola complex involvement in breast cancer patients receiving a skin-sparing mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 6:609–613

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Brachtel EF, Rusby JE, Michaelson JS, Chen LL, Muzikansky A, Smith BL, Koerner FC (2009) Occult nipple involvement in breast cancer: clinicopathologic findings in 316 consecutive mastectomy specimens. J Clin Oncol 27:4948–4954

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hartmann LC, Schaid DJ, Woods JE, Crotty TP, Myers JL, Arnold PG, Petty PM, Sellers TA, Johnson JL, McDonnell SK et al (1999) Efficacy of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy in women with a family history of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 340:77–84

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Luo D, Ha J, Latham B, Ingram D, Connell T, Hastrich D, Yeow WC, Willsher P, Luo J (2010) The accuracy of intraoperative subareolar frozen section in nipple-sparing mastectomies. Ochsner J 10:188–192

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Sacchini V, Pinotti JA, Barros AC, Luini A, Pluchinotta A, Pinotti M, Boratto MG, Ricci MD, Ruiz CA, Nisida AC et al (2006) Nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer and risk reduction: oncologic or technical problem? J Am Coll Surg 203:704–714

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gerber B, Krause A, Dieterich M, Kundt G, Reimer T (2009) The oncological safety of skin sparing mastectomy with conservation of the nipple-areola complex and autologous reconstruction: an extended follow-up study. Ann Surg 249:461–468

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Petit JY, Veronesi U, Rey P, Rotmensz N, Botteri E, Rietjens M, Garusi C, De Lorenzi F, Martella S, Bosco R et al (2009) Nipple-sparing mastectomy: risk of nipple-areolar recurrences in a series of 579 cases. Breast Cancer Res Treat 114:97–101

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kim HJ, Park EH, Lim WS, Seo JY, Koh BS, Lee TJ, Eom JS, Lee SW, Son BH, Lee JW, Ahn SH (2010) Nipple areola skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap reconstruction is an oncologically safe procedure: a single center study. Ann Surg 251:493–498

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Paepke S, Schmid R, Fleckner S, Paepke D, Niemeyer M, Schmalfeldt B, Jacobs VR, Kiechle M (2009) Subcutaneous mastectomy with conservation of the nipple-areola skin: broadening the indications. Ann Surg 250:288–292

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Jensen JA, Orringer JS, Giuliano AE (2011) Nipple-sparing mastectomy in 99 patients with a mean follow-up of 5 years. Ann Surg Oncol 18:1665–1670

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Warren Peled A, Foster RD, Stover AC, Itakura K, Ewing CA, Alvarado M, Hwang ES, Esserman LJ (2012) Outcomes after total skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction in 657 breasts. Ann Surg Oncol 19:3402–3409

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sakurai T, Zhang N, Suzuma T, Umemura T, Yoshimura G, Sakurai T, Yang Q (2013) Long-term follow-up of nipple-sparing mastectomy without radiotherapy: a single center study at a Japanese institution. Med Oncol 30:481

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Adam H, Bygdeson M, de Boniface J (2014) The oncological safety of nipple-sparing mastectomy—a Swedish matched cohort study. Eur J Surg Oncol 40:1209–1215

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rusby JE, Brachtel EF, Othus M, Michaelson JS, Koerner FC, Smith BL (2008) Development and validation of a model predictive of occult nipple involvement in women undergoing mastectomy. Br J Surg 95:1356–1361

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Byon W, Kim E, Kwon J, Park YL, Park C (2014) Magnetic resonance imaging and clinicopathological factors for the detection of occult nipple involvement in breast cancer patients. J Breast Cancer 17:386–392

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Eriksen C, Frisell J, Wickman M, Lidbrink E, Krawiec K, Sandelin K (2011) Immediate reconstruction with implants in women with invasive breast cancer does not affect oncological safety in a matched cohort study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 127:439–446

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. de Alcantara Filho P, Capko D, Barry JM, Morrow M, Pusic A, Sacchini VS (2011) Nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer and risk-reducing surgery: the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center experience. Ann Surg Oncol 18:3117–3122

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Steen ST, Chung AP, Han SH, Vinstein AL, Yoon JL, Giuliano AE (2013) Predicting nipple-areolar involvement using preoperative breast MRI and primary tumor characteristics. Ann Surg Oncol 20:633–639

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Yao K, Liederbach E, Tang R, Lei L, Czechura T, Sisco M, Howard M, Hulick PJ, Weissman S, Winchester DJ et al (2015) Nipple-sparing mastectomy in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers: an interim analysis and review of the literature. Ann Surg Oncol 22:370–376

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeong Eon Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ryu, J.M., Nam, S.J., Kim, S.W. et al. Feasibility of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Breast Reconstruction in Breast Cancer Patients with Tumor-Nipple Distance Less Than 2.0 cm. World J Surg 40, 2028–2035 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3487-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3487-0

Keywords

Navigation