Skip to main content
Log in

Evolving Management of Zenker’s Diverticulum in the Endoscopic Era: A North American Experience

  • Original Scientific Report
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Open surgical cricopharyngeal myotomy(CM) is considered standard of care for Zenker’s diverticulum(ZD). Trans-oral CM has been described using a rigid stapling device for two decades; however, this remains problematic for severely kyphotic patients. This problem can be overcome with flexible endoscopy utilizing an electrosurgical needle knife. We sought to compare clinical outcomes between these techniques to stratify patient selection.

Methods

Patients undergoing ZD treatment from 1992 to 2015 were reviewed. Demographics, diverticulum size, post-operative complications, and length of stay (LOS) were compared between open cricopharyngeal myotomy (OpenCM), rigid trans-oral stapling myotomy (RigidCM), and flexible endoscopic myotomy (FlexCM). Dysphagia scores (DS, 0:best-4:worst) and pneumonia incidence were assessed pre-operatively and post-operatively.

Results

62 patients underwent OpenCM (39/62(63 %)) or endoscopic CM (23/62(37 %) (8 RigidCM/15 FlexCM)). CM significantly reduced dysphagia for all approaches [OpenCM:2(2-3)-0(0-0); RigidCM:2(2-2)-0(0-0); FlexCM:3(3-3)-0(0-0)]. FlexCM patients had significantly worse pre-operative DS. Endoscopic CM was attempted and completed in 23/35(66 %) patients. Reasons for OpenCM conversion included inability to position the diverticular retractor due to patient body habitus (RigidCM), and the inability to position the overtube due to small ZD (FlexCM). Major post-operative complications were rare and similar in all groups. Medium-to-long-term post-myotomy pneumonia was comparable between groups. LOS (days) was reduced for FlexCM (1(1-2)) versus RigidCM (3(2-6)) and OpenCM (4(3-7)).

Conclusions

CM is highly effective for treating ZD. Open and endoscopic approaches offer comparable outcomes and dysphagia resolution. FlexCM is efficacious for large ZD and can be performed in most patients irrespective of body habitus. FlexCM represents an excellent approach for large ZD, while OpenCM should be reserved for small ZD for which an overtube cannot be positioned.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Siddiq MA, Sood S, Strachan D (2001) Pharyngeal pouch (Zenker’s diverticulum). Postgrad Med J 77(910):506–511

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Siddiq MA, Sood S (2004) Current management in pharyngeal pouch surgery by UK otorhinolaryngologists. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 86(4):247–252

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Maran AG, Wilson J, Al Muhanna A (1986) Pharyngeal diverticula. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 11(4):219–225

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Klockars T, Sihvo E, Makitie A (2008) Familial Zenker’s diverticulum. Acta Otolaryngol 128(9):1034–1036

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sen P, Kumar G, Bhattacharyya A (2006) Pharyngeal pouch: associations and complications. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 263(5):463–468

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Leibowitz JM, Fundakowski CE, Abouyared M et al (2014) Surgical techniques for Zenker’s Diverticulum: a comparative analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 151(1):52–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cook IJ, Gabb M, Panagopoulos V et al (1992) Pharyngeal (Zenker’s) diverticulum is a disorder of upper esophageal sphincter opening. Gastroenterology 103(4):1229–1235

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cook IJ, Blumbergs P, Cash K et al (1992) Structural abnormalities of the cricopharyngeus muscle in patients with pharyngeal (Zenker’s) diverticulum. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 7(6):556–562

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bizzotto A, Iacopini F, Landi R et al (2013) Zenker’s diverticulum: exploring treatment options. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 33(4):219–229

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Laing MR, Murthy P, Ah-See KW et al (1995) Surgery for pharyngeal pouch: audit of management with short- and long-term follow-up. J R Coll Surg Edinb 40(5):315–318

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Feeley MA, Righi PD, Weisberger EC et al (1999) Zenker’s diverticulum: analysis of surgical complications from diverticulectomy and cricopharyngeal myotomy. Laryngoscope 109(6):858–861

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Aggerholm K, Illum P (1990) Surgical treatment of Zenker’s diverticulum. J Laryngol Otol 104(4):312–314

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dzeletovic I, Ekbom D, Baron T (2012) Flexible endoscopic and surgical management of Zenker’s diverticulum. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 6(4):449–465 quiz 466

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Collard JM, Otte JB, Kestens PJ (1993) Endoscopic stapling technique of esophagodiverticulostomy for Zenker’s diverticulum. Ann Thorac Surg 56(3):573–576

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mulder CJ, den Hartog G, Robijn RJ et al (1995) Flexible endoscopic treatment of Zenker’s diverticulum: a new approach. Endoscopy 27(6):438–442

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bergquist H, Wenger U, Johnsson E et al (2005) Stent insertion or endoluminal brachytherapy as palliation of patients with advanced cancer of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction. Results of a randomized, controlled clinical trial. ISDE 18(3):131–139

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bonavina L, Rottoli M, Bona D et al (2012) Transoral stapling for Zenker diverticulum: effect of the traction suture-assisted technique on long-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 26(10):2856–2861

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yuan Y, Zhao YF, Hu Y et al (2013) Surgical treatment of Zenker’s diverticulum. Dig Surg 30(3):207–218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chiari C, Yeganehfar W, Scharitzer M et al (2003) Significant symptomatic relief after transoral endoscopic staple-assisted treatment of Zenker’s diverticulum. Surg Endosc 17(4):596–600

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rizzetto C, Zaninotto G, Costantini M et al (2008) Zenker’s diverticula: feasibility of a tailored approach based on diverticulum size. J Gastrointest Surg 12(12):2057–2064

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gutschow CA, Hamoir M, Rombaux P et al (2002) Management of pharyngoesophageal (Zenker’s) diverticulum: which technique? Ann Thorac Surg 74(5):1677–1682

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Baldo V, Cocchio S, Baldovin T et al (2014) A population-based study on the impact of hospitalization for pneumonia in different age groups. BMC Infect Dis 14(1):485

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Mara Leimanis for assisting with data collection. There was no organizational or external financial support for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Jones.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None of the authors have financial interest in the products, procedures, or devices presented in the manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jones, D., Aloraini, A., Gowing, S. et al. Evolving Management of Zenker’s Diverticulum in the Endoscopic Era: A North American Experience. World J Surg 40, 1390–1396 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3442-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3442-0

Keywords

Navigation