Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Practical Approaches to Definitive Reconstruction of Complex Abdominal Wall Defects

  • Scientific Review
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With advances in abdominal surgery and the management of major trauma, complex abdominal wall defects have become the new surgical disease, and the need for abdominal wall reconstruction has increased dramatically. Subsequently, how to reconstruct these large defects has become a new surgical question. While most surgeons use native abdominal wall whenever possible, evidence suggests that synthetic or biologic mesh needs to be added to large ventral hernia repairs. One particular group of patients who exemplify “complex” are those with contaminated wounds, enterocutaneous fistulas, enteroatmospheric fistulas, and/or stoma(s), where synthetic mesh is to be avoided if at all possible. Most recently, biologic mesh has become the new standard in high-risk patients with contaminated and dirty-infected wounds. While biologic mesh is the most common tissue engineered used in this field of surgery, level I evidence is needed on its indication and long-term outcomes. Various techniques for reconstructing the abdominal wall have been described, however the long-term outcomes for most of these studies, are rarely reported. In this article, I outline current practical approaches to perioperative management and definitive abdominal reconstruction in patients with complex abdominal wall defects, with or without fistulas, as well as those who have lost abdominal domain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nguyen MT, Berger RL, Hicks SC et al (2014) Comparison of outcomes of synthetic mesh vs suture repair of elective primary ventral herniorrhaphy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Surg 149:415–421

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. HCUPnet. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) (2008–2012) Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. http://hcupnet.ahrq.gov/. Accessed July 10, 2015

  3. Higa G, Friese R, O’Keeffe T et al (2010) Damage control laparotomy: a vital tool once overused. J Trauma 69:53–59

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Latifi R, Gustafson M (2011) Abdominal wall reconstruction in patients with enterocutaneous fistulas. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 37:241–250

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Becker HP, Willms A, Schwab R (2007) Small bowel fistuals and the open abdomen. Scand J Surg 96:263–271

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hadeed JG, Walsh MD, Pappas TN et al (2011) Complex abdominal wall hernias: a new classification system and approach to management based on review of 133 consecutive patients. Ann Plast Surg 66:497–503

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Connolly PT, Teubner A, Lees NP et al (2008) Outcome of reconstructive surgery for intestinal fistula in the open abdomen. Ann Surg 247:440–444

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Visschers RG, van Gemert WG, Winkens B et al (2012) Guided treatment improves outcome of patients with enterocutaneous fistulas. World J Surg 36:2341–2348. doi:10.1007/s00268-012-1663-4

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Visschers RG, Olde Damink SW, van Bekkum M et al (2008) Health-related quality of life in patients treated for enterocutaneous fistula. Br J Surg 95:1280–1286

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Latifi R, Peralta R, Al Thani H (2013) Abdominal wall reconstruction in patients with an open abdomen and enterocutaneous fistulas: a nine-step treatment strategy. In: Latifi R (ed) Surgery of complex abdominal wall defects. Springer, New York, pp 133–146

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Girard E, Messager M, Sauvanet A et al (2014) Anastomotic leakage after gastrointestinal surgery: diagnosis and management. J Visc Surg 151:441–450

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Redden MH, Ramsay P, Humphries T et al (2013) The etiology of enterocutaneous fistula predicts outcome. Ochsner J 13:507–511

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kohler G, Pallwein-Prettner L, Koch OO et al (2015) Magnetic resonance-visible meshes for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. JSLS 19:e2014.00175

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A et al (2013) Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012. Intensive Care Med 39:165–228

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dietch ZC, Shah PM, Sawyer RG (2015) Advances in intra-abdominal sepsis: what is new? Curr Infect Dis Rep 17:497

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Okita Y, Kobayashi M, Araki T et al (2014) Impact of Surgical Infection Society/Infectious Disease Society of America-recommended antibiotics on postoperative intra-abdominal abscess with image-guided percutaneous abscess drainage following gastrointestinal surgery. Surg Today 45:993–1000

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Duszak R Jr, Chatterjee AR, Schneider DA (2010) National fluid shifts: fifteen-year trends in paracentesis and thoracentesis procedures. J Am Coll Radiol 7:859–864

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Polk TM, Schwab CW (2012) Metabolic and nutritional support of the enterocutaneous fistula patient: a three-phase approach. World J Surg 36:524–533. doi:10.1007/s00268-011-1315-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Latifi R (2011) Nutritional therapy in critically ill and injured patients. Surg Clin North Am 91:579–593

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Visschers RG, Olde Damink SW, Winkens B et al (2008) Treatment strategies in 135 consecutive patients with enterocutaneous fistulas. World J Surg 32:445–453. doi:10.1007/s00268-007-9371-1

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lloyd DA, Gabe SM, Windsor AC (2006) Nutrition and management of enterocutaneous fistula. Br J Surg 93:1045–1055

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Campos ACL, Andrade DF, Campos GMR et al (1999) A multivariate model to determine prognostic factors in gastrointestinal fistuals. J Am Coll Surg 188:483–490

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Li J, Ren J, Zhu W et al (2003) Management of enterocutaneous fistulas 30 year clinical expereince. Chin Med J 116:171–175

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hollington P, Mawdsley J, Lim W et al (2004) An 11-year experience of enterocutaneous fistula. Br J Surg 91:1646–1651

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Edmunds LH Jr, Williams GM, Welch CE (1960) External fistulas arising from the gastro-intestinal tract. Ann Surg 152:445–469

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Berry SM, Fischer JE (1996) Classification and pathophysiology of enterocutaneous fistulas. Surg Clin North Am 76:1009–1018

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Evenson AR, Fischer JE (2006) Current management of enterocutaneous fistula. J Gastrointest Surg 10:455–464

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Soeters PB, Ebeid AM, Fischer JE (1979) Review of 404 patients with gastrointestinal fistulas: impact of parenteral nutrition. Ann Surg 190:189–202

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wu Y, Ren J, Wang G et al (2014) Fistuloclysis improves liver function and nutritional status in patients with high-output upper enteric fistula. Gastroenterol Res Pract. doi:10.1155/2014/941514

  30. Lévy E, Palmer DL, Frileux P et al (1983) Inhibition of upper gastrointestinal secretions by reinfusion of succus entericus into the distal small bowel. A clinical study of 30 patients with peritonitis and temporary enterostomy. Ann Surg 198:596

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Teubner A, Morrison K, Ravishankar H et al (2004) Fistuloclysis can successfully replace parenteral feeding in the nutritional support of patients with enterocutaneous fistula. Br J Surg 91:625–631

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Soares KC, Baltodano PA, Hicks CW et al (2015) Novel wound management system reduction of surgical site morbidity after ventral hernia repairs: a critical analysis. Am J Surg 209:324–332

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Heineman JT, Garcia LJ, Obst MA et al (2015) Collapsible enteroatmospheric fistula isolation device: a novel, simple solution to a complex problem. J Am Coll Surg 221:e7–e14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Dumville JC, Owens GL, Crosbie EJ et al (2015) Negative pressure wound therapy for treating surgical wounds healing by secondary intention. Cochrane Libr 1–37 (review)

  35. Horch RE (2015) Incisional negative pressure wound therapy for high-risk wounds. J Wound Care 24:21–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Mutafchiyski VM, Popivanov GI, Kjossev KT et al (2015) Open abdomen and vac® in severe diffuse peritonitis. J R Army Med Corps. doi:10.1136/jramc-2014-000386

  37. Willms A, Gusgen C, Schaaf S et al (2015) Management of the open abdomen using vacuum-assisted wound closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction. Langenbecks Arch Surg 400:91–99

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Slade DA, Carlson GL (2013) Takedown of enterocutaneous fistula and complex abdominal wall reconstruction. Surg Clin North Am 93:1163–1183

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Majercik S, Kinikini M, White T (2012) Enteroatmospheric fistula from soup to nuts. Nutr Clin Pract 27:507–512

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Schecter WP, Hirshberg A, Chang DS et al (2009) Enteric fistulas: principles of management. J Am Coll Surg 209:484–491

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Rohrich RJ, Lowe JB, Hackney FL et al (2000) An algorithm for abdominal wall reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 105:202–216

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Sukkar SM, Dumanian GA, Szczerba SM et al (2001) Challenging abdominal wall defects. Am J Surg 181:115–121

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Lowe JB (2006) Updated algorithm for abdominal wall reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 33:225–240

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Lynch AC, Delaney CP, Senagore AJ et al (2004) Clinical outcome and factors predictive of recurrence after enterocutaneous fistula surgery. Ann Surg 240:825–831

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Owen RM, Love TP, Perez SD et al (2013) Definitive surgical treatment of enterocutaneous fistula: outcomes of a 23-year experience. JAMA Surg 148:118–126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Brenner M, Clayton JL, Tillou A et al (2009) Risk factors for recurrence after repair of enterocutaneous fistula. Arch Surg 144:500–505

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Higa G, Latifi R (2013) A difficult abdomen: clinical course-based management. In: Latifi R (ed) Surgery of complex abdominal wall defects. Springer, New York, pp 47–58

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  48. Rodriguez ED, Bluebond-Langner R, Silverman RP et al (2007) Abdominal wall reconstruction following severe loss of domain: the R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center algorithm. Plast Reconstr Surg 120:669–680

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Lord JW, Howes EL, Jolliffe N (1949) The surgical management of chronic recurrent intestinal obstruction due to adhesions. Ann Surg 129:315–322

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Joyce MR, Dietz DW (2009) Management of complex gastrointestinal fistula. Curr Probl Surg 46:384–430

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Martinez JL, Luque-de-Leon E, Mier J et al (2008) Systematic management of postoperative enterocutaneous fistulas: factors related to outcomes. World J Surg 32:436–443. doi:10.1007/s00268-007-9304-z (discussion 444)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Leppaniemi A, Tukiainen E (2013) Reconstruction of complex abdominal wall defects. Scand J Surg 102:14–19

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Albanese A (1951) Eventracion mediana xifoumbilical gigante: metodo para su tratamiento. Rev Asoc Med Argent 65:376–378

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Ramirez OM, Ruas E, Dellon AL (1990) “Components separation” method for closure of abdominal-wall defects: an anatomic and clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg 86:519–526

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Lisiecki J, Kozlow JH, Agarwal S et al (2015) Abdominal wall dynamics after component separation hernia repair. J Surg Res 193:497–503

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Mericli AF, Bell D, DeGeorge BR Jr et al (2013) The single fascial incision modification of the “open-book” component separation repair: a 15-year experience. Ann Plast Surg 71:203–208

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. O’Halloran EB, Barwegen CJ, Dombrowski JM et al (2014) Can’t have one without the other: component separation plus mesh for repairing difficult incisional hernias. Surgery 156:894–899

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Slater NJ, Bokkerink WJ, Konijn V et al (2015) Safety and durability of one-stage repair of abdominal wall defects with enteric fistulas. Ann Surg 261:553–557

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Slater NJ, van Goor H, Bleichrodt RP (2015) Large and complex ventral hernia repair using “components separation technique” without mesh results in a high recurrence rate. Am J Surg 209:170–179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Fischer JP, Basta MN, Mirzabeigi MN et al (2014) A comparison of outcomes and cost in VHWG grade II hernias between Rives-Stoppa synthetic mesh hernia repair versus underlay biologic mesh repair. Hernia 18:781–789

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Cobb WS, Warren JA, Ewing JA et al (2015) Open retromuscular mesh repair of complex incisional hernia: predictors of wound events and recurrence. J Am Coll Surg 220:606–613

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Petro CC, Posielski NM, Raigani S et al (2015) Risk factors for wound morbidity after open retromuscular (sublay) hernia repair. Surgery. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2015.1005.1003

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Richmond B, Harrah T, Dyer B et al (2014) Component separation with porcine acellular dermal reinforcement is superior to traditional bridged mesh repairs in the open repair of significant midline ventral hernia defects. Am Surg 80:725–731

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Harth KC, Broome AM, Jacobs MR et al (2011) Bacterial clearance of biologic grafts used in hernia repair: an experimental study. Surg Endosc 25:2224–2229

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Latifi R, Joseph B, Kulvatunyou N et al (2012) Enterocutaneous fistulas and a hostile abdomen: reoperative surgical approaches. World J Surg 36:516–523. doi:10.1007/s00268-011-1306-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Ventral Hernia Working G, Breuing K, Butler CE et al (2010) Incisional ventral hernias: review of the literature and recommendations regarding the grading and technique of repair. Surgery 148:544–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Kohler G, Weitzendorfer M, Kalcher V et al (2015) Synthetic mesh repair for incisional hernia treatment in high-risk patients for surgical site occurrences. Am Surg 81:387–394

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Pinell-White XA, Gruszynski M, Losken A (2014) Ventral hernia repair after bowel surgery: does gastrointestinal contamination matter in the era of biologic mesh? Ann Plast Surg 72:S150–S152

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Rosen MJ, Krpata DM, Ermlich B et al (2013) A 5-year clinical experience with single-staged repairs of infected and contaminated abdominal wall defects utilizing biologic mesh. Ann Surg 257:991–996

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Bluebond-Langner R, Keifa ES, Mithani S et al (2008) Recurrent abdominal laxity following interpositional human acellular dermal matrix. Ann Plast Surg 60:76–80

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Peralta R, Latifi R (2012) Long-term outcomes of abdominal wall reconstruction. What are the real numbers? World J Surg 36:534–538. doi:10.1007/s00268-012-1454-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Slater NJ, van der Kolk M, Hendriks T et al (2013) Biologic grafts for ventral hernia repair: a systematic review. Am J Surg 205:220–230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Fabian TC, Croce MA, Pritchard FE et al (1994) Planned ventral hernia: staged management for acute abdominal wall defects. Ann Surg 219:643–653

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Krpata DM, Stein SL, Eston M et al (2013) Outcomes of simultaneous large complex abdominal wall reconstruction and enterocutaneous fistula takedown. Am J Surg 205:354–358 (discussion 358-359)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Satterwhite TS, Miri S, Chung C et al (2012) Outcomes of complex abdominal herniorrhaphy: experience with 106 cases. Ann Plast Surg 68:382–388

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Darehzereshki A, Goldfarb M, Zehetner J et al (2014) Biologic versus nonbiologic mesh in ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg 38:40–50. doi:10.1007/s00268-013-2232-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Broyles JM, Abt NB, Sacks JM et al (2013) Bioprosthetic tissue matrices in complex abdominal wall reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 1:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  78. Burger JWA, Luijendijk RW, Hop WCJ et al (2004) Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia. Ann Surg 240:578–585

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Arizona, 1501 N. Campbell Avenue, Tucson, AZ, 85724, USA

    Rifat Latifi

Authors
  1. Rifat Latifi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rifat Latifi.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

No potential or real conflicts of interest to report.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Latifi, R. Practical Approaches to Definitive Reconstruction of Complex Abdominal Wall Defects. World J Surg 40, 836–848 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-015-3294-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-015-3294-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation