Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Quality of Life After Surgical Treatment of Early Barrett’s Cancer: A Prospective Comparison of the Ivor-Lewis Resection Versus the Modified Merendino Resection

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The Merendino (MER) procedure has been evaluated as an alternative to transthoracic esophageal resection (TER) for early stage Barrett’s carcinoma. Apart from reducing morbidity and mortality, improvements concerning postoperative health-related quality of life (HRQL) have been postulated. The aim of our study was to compare HRQL between these procedures.

Materials and methods

Between July 2000 and July 2007, 117 patients with early Barrett’s carcinoma underwent surgery. Patients with tumor recurrence were excluded from the study. HRQL was assessed 1 and 2 years after surgery using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Core Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30) and the QLQ-OES18 module. Patients recently diagnosed with early Barrett’s carcinoma served as controls. Symptoms that showed a difference of more than ten between the control and the study groups were considered clinically relevant and were tested for significant differences between the study groups using the Mann–Whitney U test (p < 0.05).

Results

The response rates for the questionnaires ranged between 70 and 93 %. In the MER group, more items reflected a clinical relevant impairment of HRQL than in the TER group. Significant complaints in the MER group included nausea/vomiting, appetite loss, local pain, difficulties with social eating, and choking. Moreover, we found a significant restriction concerning global health and emotional and social functioning in this group 1 year after surgery. 2 years postoperatively, hardly any differences between the operative techniques could be detected. The only symptom in favor of the MER procedure was a better dysphagia score postoperatively.

Conclusion

Our study suggests that MER procedure is not superior to subtotal esophagectomy with regard to HRQL.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jemal A, Murray T, Ward E et al (2005) Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 1:10–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Buttar NS, Wang KK, Sebo TJ et al (2001) Extent of high-grade dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus correlates with risk of adenocarcinoma. Gastroenterology 7:1630–1639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Aldulaimi DM, Cox M, Nwokolo CU et al (2005) Barrett’s surveillance is worthwhile and detects curable cancers. A prospective cohort study addressing cancer incidence, treatment outcome and survival. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 9:943–950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fountoulakis A, Zafirellis KD, Dolan K et al (2004) Effect of surveillance of Barrett’s oesophagus on the clinical outcome of oesophageal cancer. Br J Surg 8:997–1003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jamieson GG, Mathew G, Ludemann R et al (2004) Postoperative mortality following oesophagectomy and problems in reporting its rate. Br J Surg 8:943–947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Viklund P, Lindblad M, Lu M et al (2006) Risk factors for complications after esophageal cancer resection: a prospective population-based study in Sweden. Ann Surg 2:204–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Scarpa M, Valente S, Alfieri R et al (2011) Systematic review of health-related quality of life after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 42:4660–4674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Scarpa M, Saadeh LM, Fasolo A et al (2013) Health-related quality of life in patients with oesophageal cancer: analysis at different steps of the treatment pathway. J Gastrointest Surg 3:421–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tatematsu N, Hasegawa S, Tanaka E et al (2013) Impact of oesophagectomy on physical fitness and health-related quality of life in patients with oesophageal cancer. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 22(3):308–313

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Chennat J, Konda VJA, Ross AS et al (2009) Complete Barrett’s eradication endoscopic mucosal resection: an effective treatment modality for high-grade dysplasia and intramucosal carcinoma: an American single-center experience. Am J Gastroenterol 11:2684–2692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dunbar KB, Spechler SJ (2012) The risk of lymph-node metastases in patients with high-grade dysplasia or intramucosal carcinoma in Barrett’s esophagus: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol 6:850–862 quiz 863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pech O, Behrens A, May A et al (2008) Long-term results and risk factor analysis for recurrence after curative endoscopic therapy in 349 patients with high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and mucosal adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s oesophagus. Gut 9:1200–1206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pech O, Bollschweiler E, Manner H et al (2011) Comparison between endoscopic and surgical resection of mucosal esophageal adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s esophagus at two high-volume centers. Ann Surg 1:67–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Omloo JMT, Lagarde SM, Hulscher JBF et al (2007) Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the mid/distal esophagus: five-year survival of a randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg 6:992–1000 discussion 1000–1001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Stein HJ, Feith M, Mueller J et al (2000) Limited resection for early adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s esophagus. Ann Surg 6:733–742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Merendino KA, Dillard DH (1955) The concept of sphincter substitution by an interposed jejunal segment for anatomic and physiologic abnormalities at the esophagogastric junction; with special reference to reflux esophagitis, cardiospasm and esophageal varices. Ann Surg 3:486–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gerzic ZB (1997) Modification of the Merendino procedure. Dis Esophagus 4:270–275

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gaissert HA, Mathisen DJ, Grillo HC et al (1993) Short-segment intestinal interposition of the distal esophagus. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 5:860–866 discussion 866–867

    Google Scholar 

  19. Picchio M, Lombardi A, Zolovkins A et al (1997) Jejunal interposition for peptic stenosis of the esophagus following esophagomyotomy for achalasia. Int Surg 2:198–200

    Google Scholar 

  20. Parameswaran R, McNair A, Avery KNL et al (2008) The role of health-related quality of life outcomes in clinical decision making in surgery for esophageal cancer: a systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol 9:2372–2379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bennett C, Vakil N, Bergman J et al (2012) Consensus statements for management of Barrett’s dysplasia and early-stage esophageal adenocarcinoma, based on a Delphi process. Gastroenterology 2:336–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pech O, May A, Rabenstein T et al (2007) Endoscopic resection of early oesophageal cancer. Gut 11:1625–1634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ando S, Tsuji H (2008) Surgical technique of vagus nerve-preserving gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer. ANZ J Surg 3:172–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B et al (1993) The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 5:365–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Blazeby JM, Conroy T, Hammerlid E et al (2003) Clinical and psychometric validation of an EORTC questionnaire module, the EORTC QLQ-OES18, to assess quality of life in patients with oesophageal cancer. Eur J Cancer 10:1384–1394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Fayers PM (2008) Evaluating the effectiveness of using PROs in clinical practice: a role for cluster-randomised trials. Qual Life Res 10:1315–1321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Viklund P, Wengström Y, Rouvelas I et al (2006) Quality of life and persisting symptoms after oesophageal cancer surgery. Eur J Cancer 10:1407–1414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Osoba D, Rodrigues G, Myles J et al (1998) Interpreting the significance of changes in health-related quality-of-life scores. J Clin Oncol 1:139–144

    Google Scholar 

  29. King MT (1996) The interpretation of scores from the EORTC quality of life questionnaire QLQ-C30. Qual Life Res 6:555–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. de Boer AGEM, van Lanschot JJB, van Sandick JW et al (2004) Quality of life after transhiatal compared with extended transthoracic resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. J Clin Oncol 20:4202–4208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Blazeby JM, Farndon JR, Donovan J et al (2000) A prospective longitudinal study examining the quality of life of patients with esophageal carcinoma. Cancer 8:1781–1787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Moraca RJ, Low DE (2006) Outcomes and health-related quality of life after esophagectomy for high-grade dysplasia and intramucosal cancer. Arch Surg 6:545–549 discussion 549–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Parameswaran R, Blazeby JM, Hughes R et al (2010) Health-related quality of life after minimally invasive oesophagectomy. Br J Surg 4:525–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Rutegård M, Lagergren J, Rouvelas I et al (2008) Population-based study of surgical factors in relation to health-related quality of life after oesophageal cancer resection. Br J Surg 5:592–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Barbour AP, Lagergren P, Hughes R et al (2008) Health-related quality of life among patients with adenocarcinoma of the gastro-oesophageal junction treated by gastrectomy or oesophagectomy. Br J Surg 1:80–84

    Google Scholar 

  36. Djärv T, Lagergren J, Blazeby JM et al (2008) Long-term health-related quality of life following surgery for oesophageal cancer. Br J Surg 9:1121–1126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Lagergren P, Avery KNL, Hughes R et al (2007) Health-related quality of life among patients cured by surgery for esophageal cancer. Cancer 3:686–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Lee SS, Ryu SW, Kim IH et al (2012) Quality of life beyond the early postoperative period after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy: the level of patient expectation as the essence of quality of life. Gastric Cancer 3:299–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Sullivan M, Tanzer M, Reardon G et al (2011) The role of presurgical expectancies in predicting pain and function one year following total knee arthroplasty. Pain 10:2287–2293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Gutschow CA, Hölscher AH, Leers J et al (2013) Health-related quality of life after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 398(2):231–237

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Herrero LA, van Vilsteren FGI, Pouw RE et al (2011) Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation combined with endoscopic resection for early neoplasia in Barrett’s esophagus longer than 10 cm. Gastrointest Endosc 4:682–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Pech O, Behrens A, May A et al (2008) Long-term results and risk factor analysis for recurrence after curative endoscopic therapy in 349 patients with high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and mucosal adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s oesophagus. Gut 9:1200–1206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Hölscher AH, Vallböhmer D, Gutschow C et al (2009) Reflux esophagitis, high-grade neoplasia, and early Barrett’s carcinoma: what is the place of the Merendino procedure? Langenbecks Arch Surg 3:417–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Dr. Horst-Schmidt-Klinik, Ludwig-Erhard-Str. 100, 65199, Wiesbaden, Germany

    Ch. Zapletal, Ch. Heesen, J. Origer, M. Pauthner & Dietmar Lorenz

  2. Department of Gastroenterology, Dr. Horst-Schmidt-Klinik, Wiesbaden, Germany

    O. Pech & Ch. Ell

Authors
  1. Ch. Zapletal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ch. Heesen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. Origer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. Pauthner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. O. Pech
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ch. Ell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Dietmar Lorenz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ch. Zapletal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zapletal, C., Heesen, C., Origer, J. et al. Quality of Life After Surgical Treatment of Early Barrett’s Cancer: A Prospective Comparison of the Ivor-Lewis Resection Versus the Modified Merendino Resection. World J Surg 38, 1444–1452 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2410-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2410-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation