Abstract
Background
The purpose of the present study was to assess the reliability of implementation data regarding the surgical safety checklist (SSC) and to identify which factors influence actual implementation.
Methods
The study was a retrospective record-based evaluation in a regional network of nine Spanish hospitals, combined with a complementary direct-observation study that included a survey of the surgical teams’ attitudes. SSC compliance and associated factors were assessed and compared in a retrospective sample of 280 operations and a concurrent sample of another 85 surgical interventions.
Results
In the retrospective evaluation the SSC was present in 83.1 % of cases, fully completed in 28.4 %, with 69.3 % of all possible items checked. The concurrent direct-observation study showed that recorded compliance was unreliable (κ < 0.13 for all items) and significantly higher (p < 0.001) than actual compliance. Over-registration occurred across hospitals and surgical specialties. Factors associated with recorded compliance included hospital size, surgical specialty, and the use of an electronic format. In actual (direct-observation) compliance, a positive attitude on the part of the surgeon is an overriding significant factor (OR 12.8), along with using the electronic format, which is consistently and positively associated with recorded compliance but negatively related to actual compliance.
Conclusions
Recorded SSC compliance may be widely unreliable and higher than actual compliance, particularly when recording is facilitated by using an electronic format. A positive attitude on the part of the surgical team, particularly surgeons, is associated with actual compliance. Effective use of the SSC is a far more complex adaptive process than the usual mandatory strategy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Weiser TG, Regenbogen SE, Thompson KD et al (2008) An estimation of the global volume of surgery: a modeling strategy based on available data. Lancet 372:139–144
De Vries EN, Ramrattan MA, Smorenburg SM et al (2008) The incidence and nature of in-hospital adverse events: a systematic review. Qual Saf Health Care 17:216–223
Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR et al (2009) A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med 360:491–499
De Vries EN, Hubert AP, Crolla R et al (2010) Effect of a comprehensive surgical safety system on patient outcomes. N Engl J Med 363:1928–1937
Lyons MK (2010) Eight-year experience with a neurosurgical checklist. Am J Med Qual 25:285–288
Lindgard L, Espin S, Rubin B et al (2005) Getting teams to talk: development and pilot implementation of a checklist to promote interprofessional communication in the OR. Qual Saf Health Care 14:340–346
Messael FM, Al-Qahtani AS (2009) Benchmarking of World Health Organization surgical safety checklist. Saudi Med J 30:422–425
Surgical safety checklist. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2009/9789241598590_eng_Checklist.pdf (Accessed May 2013)
World Health Organization (2009) Implementation manual WHO surgical safety checklist 2009. WHO, Geneva
Weiser TG, Haynes AB, Berry WR et al (2010) Effect of a 19-item surgical safety checklist during urgent operations in a global patient population. Ann Surg 251:976–980
Surgical safety web map. http://maps.cga.harvard.edu:8080/Hospital/. Accessed May 2013
Vijayasekar C, Steele RJC (2009) The World Health Organization’s surgical safety checklist. Surgeon 7:260–262
Sewell M, Adebibe M, Jayakumar P et al (2011) Use of the WHO surgical safety checklist in trauma and orthopaedic patients. Int Orthop 35:897–901
Van Klei WA, Hoff RG, Van Aarnhem E et al (2012) Effects of the introduction of the WHO “Surgical Safety Checklist” on in-hospital mortality: a cohort study. Ann Surg 255:44–49
Vats A, Vincent CA, Nagpal K et al (2010) Practical challenges of introducing WHO surgical checklist: UK pilot experience. Br Med J 340:b5433
Conley DM, Singer SJ, Edmondson BA et al (2011) Effective surgical safety checklist implementation. J Am Coll Surg 212:873–879
Majan RP (2011) The WHO surgical checklist. Best Prac Res Clin Anaesthesiol 25:161–168
Taylor B, Slater A, Reznick R (2010) The surgical safety checklist effects are sustained, and team culture is strengthened (editorial). Surgeon 8:1–4
Ko HC, Turner TJ, Finnigan MA (2011) Systematic review of safety check list for use by medical care teams in acute hospital settings—limited evidence of effectiveness. BMC Health Services Res 11:211
Weiser TG, Haynes AB, Lashoher A et al (2010) Perspectives in quality: designing the WHO surgical safety checklist. Int J Qual Health Care 22:365–370
Degani A (1993) Cockpit checklists: concepts, design and use. Hum Factors 35:28–43
Bosk CL, Dixon-Woods M, Goeschel CA et al (2009) Reality check for checklists. Lancet 374:444–445
Berwick DM (2003) Disseminating innovations in health care. JAMA 289:1969–1975
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Funding for this study was provided by an Agreement between the Spanish Ministry of Health and the Murcia Region to Foster Safe Practices in Health Services, project FR05IPS119.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Saturno, P.J., Soria-Aledo, V., Da Silva Gama, Z.A. et al. Understanding WHO Surgical Checklist Implementation: Tricks and Pitfalls. An Observational Study. World J Surg 38, 287–295 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2300-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2300-6