Skip to main content
Log in

Initial Experiences of an Enhanced Recovery Protocol in Esophageal Surgery

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

A recent development in gastrointestinal surgery is the implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs. Evidence regarding the benefit of these programs in patients undergoing esophageal surgery is scarce. We investigated the feasibility and possible benefit of a perioperative ERAS program in patients undergoing esophagectomy for malignant disease.

Methods

The ERAS program was initiated in 2009. Patients who underwent esophagectomy and were treated according to the ERAS program were included. Items of ERAS included preoperative nutrition, early extubation, early removal of nasogastric tube, and early mobilization. Primary outcome parameters were hospital stay and the incidence of postoperative complications. Outcome parameters in the ERAS cohort were compared to a cohort of patients who underwent surgical resection in the year prior to the implementation of the ERAS protocol. A feasibility analysis was performed among a sample of ERAS patients to determine the number of achieved items per patient.

Results

Between 2008 and August 2010, 181 patients in our department underwent esophagectomy. Of these, 103 patients were included in the ERAS program (ERAS+ group) and were compared to 78 patients who had undergone an esophagectomy in 2008 (ERAS– group). Overall hospital stay was 14 days versus 15 days (ERAS+ and ERAS–, respectively; p = 0.013). There were no significant differences in the incidence of postoperative complications in either group. The percentage of achieved items varied between 42 and 93 % per item.

Conclusions

The implementation of an ERAS program in esophageal surgery was feasible and resulted in a small but significant reduction in overall hospital stay, whereas overall morbidity was not affected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wilmore DW, Kehlet H (2001) Management of patients in fast track surgery. BMJ 322:473–476

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fearon KC, Ljungqvist O, Von MM et al (2005) Enhanced recovery after surgery: a consensus review of clinical care for patients undergoing colonic resection. Clin Nutr 24:466–477

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Schwenk W et al (2013) Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS((R))) society recommendations. World J Surg 37:259–284. doi:10.1007/s00268-012-1772-0

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lassen K, Soop M, Nygren J et al (2009) Consensus review of optimal perioperative care in colorectal surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) group recommendations. Arch Surg 144:961–969

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lassen K, Coolsen MM, Slim K et al (2013) Guidelines for perioperative care for Pancreaticoduodenectomy: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS((R))) society recommendations. World J Surg 37:240–258. doi:10.1007/s00268-012-1771-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chappell D, Jacob M (2010) Influence of non-ventilatory options on postoperative outcome. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 24:267–281

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kehlet H (1997) Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth 78:606–617

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Spanjersberg WR, Reurings J, Keus F et al. (2011) Fast track surgery versus conventional recovery strategies for colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; CD007635

  9. Hulscher JB, van Sandick JW, de Boer AG et al (2002) Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. N Engl J Med 347:1662–1669

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Swisher SG, Deford L, Merriman KW et al (2000) Effect of operative volume on morbidity, mortality, and hospital use after esophagectomy for cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 119:1126–1132

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. van Heijl M, van Lanschot JJ, Blom RL et al. (2010) [Outcomes of 16 years of oesophageal surgery: low postoperative mortality and improved long-term survival]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 154: A1156 (in Dutch)

  12. Hofstetter W, Swisher SG, Correa AM et al (2002) Treatment outcomes of resected esophageal cancer. Ann Surg 236:376–384

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Karl RC, Schreiber R, Boulware D et al (2000) Factors affecting morbidity, mortality, and survival in patients undergoing Ivor Lewis esophagogastrectomy. Ann Surg 231:635–643

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Cerfolio RJ, Bryant AS, Bass CS et al (2004) Fast tracking after Ivor Lewis esophagogastrectomy. Chest 126:1187–1194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Munitiz V, Martinez-de-Haro LF, Ortiz A et al (2010) Effectiveness of a written clinical pathway for enhanced recovery after transthoracic (Ivor Lewis) oesophagectomy. Br J Surg 97:714–718

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. van Heijl M, van Lanschot JJ, Koppert LB et al (2009) Neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery versus surgery alone for patients with adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus (CROSS). BMC Surg 8:21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Vlug MS, Wind J, Hollmann MW et al (2011) Laparoscopy in combination with fast track multimodal management is the best perioperative strategy in patients undergoing colonic surgery: a randomized clinical trial (LAFA-study). Ann Surg 254:868–875

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Caumo W, Hidalgo MP, Schmidt AP et al (2002) Effect of pre-operative anxiolysis on postoperative pain response in patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy. Anaesthesia 57:740–746

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lewis SJ, Andersen HK, Thomas S (2009) Early enteral nutrition within 24 h of intestinal surgery versus later commencement of feeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 13:569–575

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark I. van Berge Henegouwen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blom, R.L.G.M., van Heijl, M., Bemelman, W.A. et al. Initial Experiences of an Enhanced Recovery Protocol in Esophageal Surgery. World J Surg 37, 2372–2378 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2135-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2135-1

Keywords

Navigation