Introduction
The growth of bariatric surgery has resulted in varying types of procedures with increasing complexity. Robotic digital platforms are employed in bariatric surgery to address this increasing complexity in the high-risk obese patient population with difficult anatomy.
Materials and Methods
This review explores the literature and examines the reported outcomes and complications in using robotics for bariatric surgery. Robotic approaches to adjustable gastric banding, sleeve gastrectomy, gastric bypass, and biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch are examined. Revisional cases, learning curves, and cost effectiveness are reviewed, with an eye toward the future of bariatric surgery as the use of robotics is adopted.
Conclusion
Digital platforms are showing great promise as enabling technology which advance bariatric outcomes. With increasingly complex bariatric cases being performed and revised, the insertion of digital information between the surgeon and the patient leads to better operations for the patient and the surgeon.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Wittgrove AC, Clark GW, Tremblay LJ (1994) Laparoscopic gastric bypass, Roux-en-Y: preliminary report of five cases. Obes Surg 4:353–357
DeMaria EJ, Pate V, Warthen M et al (2010) Baseline data from American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery-designated Bariatric Surgery Centers of Excellence using the Bariatric Outcomes Longitudinal Database. Surg Obes Relat Dis 6:347–355
Cadiere GB, Himpens J, Vertruyen M et al (1999) The world’s first obesity surgery performed by a surgeon at a distance. Obes Surg 2:206–209
Mühlmann G, Klaus A, Kirchmayr W et al (2003) DaVinci robotic-assisted laparoscopic bariatric surgery: is it justified in a routine setting? Obes Surg 13:848–854
Galvani C, Horgan S (2005) Robots in general surgery: present and future. Cir Esp 78:138–147
Edelson PK, Dumon KR, Sonnad SS et al (2011) Robotic vs. conventional laparoscopic gastric banding: a comparison of 407 cases. Surg Endosc 25:1402–1408
Sudan R, Puri V, Sudan D (2007) Robotically assisted biliary pancreatic diversion with a duodenal switch: a new technique. Surg Endosc 21:729–733
Ayloo S, Buchs NC, Addeo P et al (2011) Robot-assisted sleeve gastrectomy for super-morbidly obese patients. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 21:295–299
Diamantis T, Alexandrou A, Nikiteas N et al (2011) Initial experience with robotic sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity. Obes Surg 21:1172–1179
Elli EF, Masrur MA, Giulianotti PC (2013) Robotic sleeve gastrectomy after liver transplantation. Surg Obes Relat Dis 9:20–22
Sudan R, Kasotakis G, Betof A et al (2010) Sleeve gastrectomy strictures: technique for robotic-assisted strictureplasty. Surg Obes Relat Dis 6:434–436
Mohr CJ, Nadzam GS, Alami RS et al (2006) Totally robotic laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: results from 75 patients. Obes Surg 16:690–696
Hubens G, Balliu L, Ruppert M et al (2008) Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedure performed with the da Vinci robot system: is it worth it? Surg Endosc 22:1690–1696
Hagen ME, Inan I, Pugin F et al (2007) The da Vinci surgical system in digestive surgery. Rev Med Suisse 3:1622–1626
Parini U, Fabozzi M, Contul RB et al (2006) Laparoscopic gastric bypass performed with the da Vinci Intuitive Robotic System: preliminary experience. Surg Endosc 20:1851–1857
Jacobsen G, Berger R, Horgan S (2003) The role of robotic surgery in morbid obesity. Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 13:279–283
Snyder BE, Wilson T, Scarborough T et al (2008) Lowering gastrointestinal leak rates: a comparative analysis of robotic and laparoscopic gastric bypass. J Robotic Surg 2:159–163
Blachar A, Federle MP, Pealer KM et al (2002) Gastrointestinal complications of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery: clinical and imaging findings. Radiology 223:625–632
Sanchez BR, Mohr CJ, Morton JM et al (2005) Comparison of totally robotic laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and traditional laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis 1:549–554
Curet MJ, Soloman H, Lui G et al (2009) Comparison of hospital charges between robotic, laparoscopic stapled, and laparoscopic hand sewn Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. J Robot Surg 3:75–78
Hagen ME, Pugin F, Chassot G et al (2012) Reducing cost of surgery by avoiding complications: the model of robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg 22:52–61
Schauer P, Ikramuddin S, Hamad G et al (2003) The learning curve for laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is 100 cases. Surg Endosc 17:212–215
Oliak D, Ballantyne GH, Weber P et al (2003) Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: defining the learning curve. Surg Endosc 17:405–408
Buchs NC, Pugin F, Bucher P et al (2012) Learning curve for robot-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc 26:1116–1121
Yu CJ, Clapp BI, Lee MJ et al (2006) Robotic assistance provides excellent outcomes during the learning curve for laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: results from 100 robotic-assisted gastric bypasses. Am J Surg 192:746–749
Tieu K, Allison N, Snyder B et al (2013) Robotic-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: update from 2 high-volume centers. Surg Obes Relat Dis 9:284–288
Patel S, Szomstein S, Rosenthal RJ (2011) Reasons and outcomes of reoperative bariatric surgery for failed and complicated procedures (excluding adjustable gastric band). Obes Surg 21:1209–1219
Snyder B, Wilson T, Woodruff V (2013) Robotically assisted revision of bariatric surgeries is safe and effective to achieve further weight loss. World J Surg. doi:10.1007%2Fs00268-013-1968-y Mar 1, 2013 Epub ahead of print
Sudan R, Bennett KM, Jacobs DO et al (2012) Multifactorial analysis of the learning curve for robot-assisted laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch. Ann Surg 255:940–945
Sudan R, Desai S (2011) Conversion of laparoscopic adjustable gastric band to robot-assisted laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch. Surg Obes Relat Dis 7:546–547
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wilson, E.B., Sudan, R. The Evolution of Robotic Bariatric Surgery. World J Surg 37, 2756–2760 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2125-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2125-3