Skip to main content
Log in

Long-Term Outcome and Quality of Life After Laparoscopic Treatment of Large Paraesophageal Hernia

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopy has been widely used for surgical repair of large paraesophageal hernias (PEHs). The technique, however, entails substantial technical difficulties, such as repositioning the stomach in the abdominal cavity, sac excision, closure of the hiatal gap, and fundoplication. Knowledge of the long-term outcome (>10 years) is scarce. The aim of this article was to evaluate the long-term results of this approach, primarily the anatomic hernia recurrence rate and the impact of the repair on quality of life.

Methods

We identified all patients who underwent laparoscopic repair for PEH between November 1997 and March 2007 and who had a minimum follow-up of 48 months. In March 2011, all available patients were scheduled for an interview, and a radiologic examination with barium swallow was performed. During the interview the patients were asked about the existence/persistence of symptoms. An objective score test, the gastrointestinal quality of life index (GIQLI), was also administered.

Results

A total of 77 patients were identified: 17 men (22 %) and 60 women (78 %). The mean age at the time of fundoplication was 64 years (range 24–87 years) and at the review time 73 years (range 34–96 years). The amount of stomach contained within the PEH sac was <50 % in 39 patients (50 %), >50 % in 31 (40 %), and 100 % (intrathoracic stomach) in 7 (9.5 %). A 360º PTFe mesh was used to reinforce the repair in six cases and a polyethylene mesh in three. In May 2011, 55 of the 77 patients were available for interview (71 %), and the mean follow-up was 107 months (range 48–160 months). Altogether, 43 patients (66 %) were asymptomatic, and 12 (21 %) reported symptoms that included dysphagia in 7 patients, heartburn in 3, belching in 1, and chest pain in 1. Esophagography in 43 patients (78 %) revealed recurrence in 20 (46 %). All recurrences were small sliding hernias (<3 cm long). In all, 37 patients (67 %) answered the GIQLI questionnaire. The mean GIQLI score was 111 (range 59–137; normal 147). Patients with objective anatomic recurrence had a quality of life index of 110 (range 89–132) versus 122 in the nonrecurrent hernia group (range 77–138, p < 0.01). Mesh was used to buttress the esophageal hiatus in nine patients. One patient died during the follow-up period. Five of the remaining eight patients (62 %) developed dysphagia, a mesh-related symptom. Three patients required reoperation because of mesh-related complications. Esophagography revealed recurrence in four (50 %) of the eight patients. GIQLI scores were similar in patients with recurrence (126, range 134–119) and without it (111, range 133–186) (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

Long-term follow-up (up to 160 months) in our study showed that laparoscopic PEH repair is clinically efficacious but is associated with small anatomic recurrences in ≤50 % of patients. Further studies are needed to identify the anatomic, pathologic, and physiological factors that may impair outcome, allowing the procedure to be tailored to each patient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schieman C, Grondin SC (2009) Paraesophageal hernia: clinical presentation, evaluation, and management controversies. Thorac Surg Clin 19:473–478

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nason KS, Luketich JD, Witteman BP et al (2012) The laparoscopic approach to paraesophageal hernia repair. J Gastrointest Surg 16:417–426

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hashemi M, Peters JH, DeMeester TR et al (2000) Laparoscopic repair of large type III hiatal hernia: objective followup reveals high recurrence rate. J Am Coll Surg 190:553–560

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Targarona EM, Novell J, Vela S et al (2004) Mid term analysis of safety and quality of life after the laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hiatal hernia. Surg Endosc 18:1045–1050

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Furnee EJ, Draaisma WA, Simmermacher RK et al (2010) Long-term symptomatic outcome and radiologic assessment of laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair. Am J Surg 199:695–701

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dallemagne B, Kohnen L, Perretta S et al (2011) Laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia: long-term follow-up reveals good clinical outcome despite high radiological recurrence rate. Ann Surg 253:291–296

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Luketich JD, Nason KS, Christie NA et al (2010) Outcomes after a decade of laparoscopic giant paraesophageal hernia repair. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 139:395–404

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Braghetto I, Korn O, Csendes A et al (2010) Postoperative results after laparoscopic approach for treatment of large hiatal hernias: is mesh always needed? Is the addition of an antireflux procedure necessary? Int Surg 95:80–87

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zaninotto G, Portale G, Costantini M et al (2007) Objective follow-up after laparoscopic repair of large type III hiatal hernia: assessment of safety and durability. World J Surg 31:2177–2183. doi:10.1007/s00268-007-9212-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mittal SK, Bikhchandani J, Gurney O et al (2011) Outcomes after repair of the intrathoracic stomach: objective follow-up of up to 5 years. Surg Endosc 25:556–566

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Louie BE, Blitz M, Farivar AS et al (2011) Repair of symptomatic giant paraesophageal hernias in elderly (>70 years) patients results in improved quality of life. J Gastrointest Surg 15:389–396

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Eypasch E, Williams JI, Wood-Dauphinee S et al (1995) Gastrointestinal quality of life index: development, validation and application of a new instrument. Br J Surg 82:216–222

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Quintana JM, Cabriada J, López de Tejada I et al (2001) Translation and validation of the gastrointestinal quality of life index (GIQLI). Rev Esp Enferm Dig 93:693–706

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Oelschlager BK, Petersen RP, Brunt LM et al (2012) Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: defining long-term clinical and anatomic outcomes. J Gastrointest Surg 16:453

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Targarona EM, Bendahan G, Balague C et al (2004) Mesh in the hiatus: a controversial issue. Arch Surg 139:1286–1296

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Herbella FA, Patti MG (2011) Hiatal mesh repair: current status. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 21:61–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Stadlhuber RJ, Sherif AE, Mittal SK et al (2009) Mesh complications after prosthetic reinforcement of hiatal closure: a 28-case series. Surg Endosc 23:1219–1226

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Oelschlager BK, Pellegrini CA, Hunter JG et al (2011) Biologic prosthesis to prevent recurrence after laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: long term follow up from a prospective randomized trial. J Am Coll Surg 213:461–468

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

Drs. Eduardo M. Targarona, Samuel Grisales, Ozlem Uyanik, Carmen Balague, Juan Carlos Pernas, and Manuel Trias, have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eduardo M. Targarona.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Targarona, E.M., Grisales, S., Uyanik, O. et al. Long-Term Outcome and Quality of Life After Laparoscopic Treatment of Large Paraesophageal Hernia. World J Surg 37, 1878–1882 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2047-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2047-0

Keywords

Navigation