Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Introducing Video-Assisted Thoracoscopy for Trauma into a South African Township Hospital

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The use of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is well established in trauma practice. This modality is readily available to centers with well-equipped operating facilities but may be challenging to introduce into resource-constrained institutions such as many South African township hospitals. We implemented VATS for retained post-traumatic pleural collections in our institution in 2007, and we have now performed an audit of the first 3 years of our experience.

Methods

A retrospective chart review was conducted of all patients who had undergone VATS from June 2007 to May 2010, and statistical analysis was performed to elucidate the findings.

Results

Forty-three patients were examined, 40 of whom (93 %) were male. The mean age was 32 years (range: 15–52 years). Thirty-five patients (81 %) had stab injuries, 6 (14 %) had blunt injuries, and 2 (4 %) had gunshot wounds. Mean time from injury to VATS was 12.4 days (range: 3–31 days). Thirteen patients (30 %) had empyema at the time of VATS. The mean time from VATS to discharge was 9 days (range: 3–30 days). The postoperative complication rate was 14 % and included pneumonia (n = 3) and re-collections (n = 3, two of which were managed by reinsertion of a chest drain, and one cleared without further intervention). Further analysis revealed a longer postoperative length of stay when empyema was present at VATS (8 days for no empyema vs. 11 days when empyema was present; p = 0.027). The incidence of empyema increased progressively the longer the delay between injury and VATS (0 % for VATS performed in week 1, 32 % for VATS in week 2, 50 % for VATS in week 3, and 60 % for VATS beyond week 3; p = 0.019). The incidence of empyema increased when >1 chest drain was inserted prior to VATS (15 % for 0–1 chest drain vs. 43 % for >1 chest drain; p = 0.043).

Conclusions

Introducing VATS for retained post-traumatic collections into a relatively resource-constrained township hospital in South Africa is safe and effective. Consideration should be given to performing VATS early and avoiding the use of a second and third chest drain for retained collections. This approach may lead to decreased incidence of empyema and shorter overall hospital stay.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahmed N, Chung R (2010) Role of early thoracoscopy for management of penetrating wounds of the chest. Am Surg 76:1236–1239

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Abolhoda A, Livingston DH, Donahoo JS et al (1997) Diagnostic and therapeutic video assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) following chest trauma. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 12:356–360

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Meyer DM, Jessen ME, Wait MA et al (1997) Early evacuation of traumatic retained hemothoraces using thoracoscopy: a prospective, randomized trial. Ann Thorac Surg 64:1396–1400

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Smith JW, Franklin GA, Harbrecht BG et al (2011) Early VATS for blunt chest trauma: a management technique underutilized by acute care surgeons. J Trauma 71:102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Smith RS, Fry WR, Tsoi EK et al (1993) Preliminary report on videothoracoscopy in the evaluation and treatment of thoracic injury. Am J Surg 166:690–693

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Carrillo EH, Schmacht DC, Gable DR et al (1998) Thoracoscopy in the management of posttraumatic persistent pneumothorax. J Am Coll Surg 186:636–639

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Schermer CR, Matteson BD, Demarest GB III et al (1999) A prospective evaluation of video-assisted thoracic surgery for persistent air leak due to trauma. Am J Surg 177:480–484

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Navsaria PH, Vogel RJ, Nicol AJ (2004) Thoracoscopic evacuation of retained posttraumatic hemothorax. Ann Thorac Surg 78:282–285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Landreneau RJ, Keenan RJ, Hazelrigg SR et al (1996) Thoracoscopy for empyema and hemothorax. Chest 109:18–24

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Freeman RK, Al-Dossari G, Hutcheson KA et al (2001) Indications for using video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery to diagnose diaphragmatic injuries after penetrating chest trauma. Ann Thorac Surg 72:342–347

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bagheri R, Tavassoli A, Sadrizadeh A et al (2009) The role of thoracoscopy for the diagnosis of hidden diaphragmatic injuries in penetrating thoracoabdominal trauma. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 9:195–197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. DuBose J, Inaba K, Demetriades D, Retained Hemothorax Study Group et al (2012) Management of post-traumatic retained hemothorax: a prospective, observational, multicenter AAST study. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 72:11–22

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to George V. Oosthuizen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Oosthuizen, G.V., Clarke, D.L., Laing, G.L. et al. Introducing Video-Assisted Thoracoscopy for Trauma into a South African Township Hospital. World J Surg 37, 1652–1655 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2026-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2026-5

Keywords

Navigation