Abstract
Background
Laparoscopic surgery is safe and effective in the management of common abdominal emergencies. However, there is currently a lack of data about its use for emergency colorectal surgery. We hypothesized that laparoscopy can improve the postoperative outcomes of emergency restorative colon resection.
Methods
Adult patients undergoing emergent open and laparoscopic colon resection with primary anastomosis were retrieved from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database for the years 2005 to 2008 inclusive. Demographic and operative characteristics, laboratory values, and postoperative outcomes were compared between patients undergoing laparoscopic and open colon resection using univariate analyses, multivariate logistic regression, and propensity score analyses.
Results
A total of 341 laparoscopic (9.6 %) and 3211 (90.4 %) open colon resections were included. Patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery had a significantly lower prevalence of co-morbidities and better postoperative outcomes. On multivariate analysis, laparoscopic surgery was an independent predictor of a longer operating time (p < 0.001) and shorter total (p = 0.013) and postoperative (p = 0.004) hospital stays, but it did not affect the need for intraoperative blood transfusion (p = 0.488), the 30-day reoperation rates (p = 0.969), or mortality (p = 0.417). After adjusted propensity score analysis, postoperative morbidity (p = 0.833) and mortality (p = 0.568) were comparable in patients undergoing laparoscopic and open surgery.
Conclusions
On a national scale, laparoscopic emergent colon resections are being performed in a small number of patients, who have favorable co-morbidity characteristics and improved postoperative outcomes. Laparoscopic emergent colon resection with primary anastomosis has postoperative morbidity and mortality rates comparable to those seen with the open approach, and it reduces the total and postoperative length of hospital stay.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Long KH, Bannon MP, Zietlow SP et al (2001) A prospective randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy: clinical and economic analyses. Surgery 129:390–400
Milewczyk M, Michalik M, Ciesielski M (2003) A prospective, randomized, unicenter study comparing laparoscopic and open treatments of acute appendicitis. Surg Endosc 17:1023–1028
Kiviluoto T, Sirén J, Luukkonen P et al (1998) Randomised trial of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for acute and gangrenous cholecystitis. Lancet 351:321–325
Kennedy GD, Heise C, Rajamanickam V et al (2009) Laparoscopy decreases postoperative complication rates after abdominal colectomy: results from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Ann Surg 249:596–601
Bilimoria KY, Bentrem DJ, Merkow RP et al (2008) Laparoscopic-assisted vs. open colectomy for cancer: comparison of short-term outcomes from 121 hospitals. J Gastrointest Surg 12:2001–2009
Seshadri PA, Poulin EC, Schlachta CM et al (2001) Does a laparoscopic approach to total abdominal colectomy and proctocolectomy offer advantages? Surg Endosc 15:837–842
Dunker MS, Bemelman WA, Slors JF et al (2000) Laparoscopic-assisted vs open colectomy for severe acute colitis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD): a retrospective study in 42 patients. Surg Endosc 14:911–914
Fowkes L, Krishna K, Menon A et al (2008) Laparoscopic emergency and elective surgery for ulcerative colitis. Colorectal Dis 10:373–378
Li JC, Ng SS, Lee JF et al (2009) Emergency laparoscopic-assisted versus open right hemicolectomy for complicated cecal diverticulitis: a comparative study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 19:479–483
Chouillard E, Maggiori L, Ata T et al (2007) Laparoscopic two-stage left colonic resection for patients with peritonitis caused by acute diverticulitis. Dis Colon Rectum 50:1157–1163
Khuri SF (2005) The NSQIP: a new frontier in surgery. Surgery 138:837–843
Anonymous (2009) American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP). User Guide for the 2008 Participant Use Data File. Available at: http://www.acsnsqip.org/puf/docs/ACS_NSQIP_Participant_User_Data_File_User_Guide.pdf/. Accessed August 12, 2009
Greenblatt DY, Rajamanickam V, Pugely AJ et al (2011) Short-term outcomes after laparoscopic-assisted proctectomy for rectal cancer: results from the ACS NSQIP. J Am Coll Surg 212:844–854
D’Agostino RB Jr (1998) Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Stat Med 17:2265–2281
Agresta F, De Simone P, Bedin N (2004) The laparoscopic approach in abdominal emergencies: a single-center 10-year experience. JSLS 8:25–30
Marcello PW, Milsom JW, Wong SK et al (2001) Laparoscopic total colectomy for acute colitis: a case-control study. Dis Colon Rectum 44:1441–1445
Ng SS, Lee JF, Yiu RY et al (2008) Emergency laparoscopic-assisted versus open right hemicolectomy for obstructing right-sided colonic carcinoma: a comparative study of short-term clinical outcomes. World J Surg 32:454–458. doi:10.1007/s00268-007-9400-0
Guller U, Jain N, Hervey S et al (2003) Laparoscopic vs open colectomy: outcomes comparison based on large nationwide databases. Arch Surg 138:1179–1186
Scheer A, Martel G, Moloo H et al (2009) Laparoscopic colon surgery: does operative time matter? Dis Colon Rectum 52:1746–1752
Chen W, Sailhamer E, Berger DL et al (2007) Operative time is a poor surrogate for the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 21:238–243
Akiyoshi T, Kuroyanagi H, Oya M et al (2009) Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic rectal surgery for primary rectal cancer in elderly patients: is it safe and beneficial? J Gastrointest Surg 13:1614–1618
Watanabe K, Funayama Y, Fukushima K et al (2009) Hand-assisted laparoscopic vs. open subtotal colectomy for severe ulcerative colitis. Dis Colon Rectum 52:640–645
Boyle E, Ridgway PF, Keane FB et al (2008) Laparoscopic colonic resection in inflammatory bowel disease: minimal surgery, minimal access and minimal hospital stay. Colorectal Dis 10:911–915
Hewett PJ, Allardyce RA, Bagshaw PF et al (2008) Short-term outcomes of the Australasian randomized clinical study comparing laparoscopic and conventional open surgical treatments for colon cancer: the ALCCaS trial. Ann Surg 248:728–738
Braga M, Frasson M, Vignali A, et al (2007) Open right colectomy is still effective compared to laparoscopy: results of a randomized trial. Ann Surg 246:1010–1014
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ballian, N., Weisensel, N., Rajamanickam, V. et al. Comparable Postoperative Morbidity and Mortality After Laparoscopic and Open Emergent Restorative Colectomy: Outcomes From the ACS NSQIP. World J Surg 36, 2488–2496 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-012-1694-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-012-1694-x