Skip to main content
Log in

Diagnostic Role of Procalcitonin in Patients with Suspected Appendicitis

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic value of procalcitonin (PCT) in emergency department (ED) patients with suspected appendicitis.

Methods

A prospective observational study was carried out inthe emergency department of a university hospital between July 2007 and June 2008. Adult patients who presented to the ED with clinically suspected appendicitis were enrolled. Each patient underwent serum PCT, C-reactive protein (CRP), and Alvarado score evaluation on admission. The results of these three measurements were analyzed in relation to the final diagnosis determined by histopathological findings or compatible computed tomography findings.

Results

Of the 214 study patients, 113 (52.8 %) had a confirmed diagnosis of appendicitis and 58 had complicated appendicitis (phlegmon, perforation, or gangrene). For the diagnosis of appendicitis, the area under the receiving operating characteristic (ROC) curve is 0.74 for Alvarado score, 0.69 for PCT, and 0.61 for CRP. Overall, the Alvarado score has the best discriminative capability among the three tested markers. We adopted two cutoff point approaches to harness both ends of the diagnostic value of a biomarker. PCT levels were significantly higher in patients with complicated appendicitis. For diagnosis of complicated appendicitis, a cutoff value of 0.5 ng/mL had a sensitivity of 29 % and a specificity of 95 %, while a cutoff value of 0.05 ng/ml had a sensitivity of 85 % and a specificity of 30 % in diagnosing complicated appendicitis. For those with a PCT value in the gray zone, clinical findings may play a more important role.

Conclusion

The study does not support the hypothesis that the PCT test may be useful for screening ED patients for appendicitis. However, determination of the PCT level may be useful for risk assessment of ED patients with suspected complicated appendicitis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bundy DG, Byerley JS, Liles EA et al (2007) Does this child have appendicitis? JAMA 298(4):438–451

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Morin MJ (2008) Diagnosing acute appendicitis in adults. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191(6):W315 (author reply W 316)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Singhal V, Jadha V (2007) Acute appendicitis: are we over diagnosing it? Ann R Coll Surg Eng l89(8):766–769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wong KK, Cheung TW, Tam PK (2008) Diagnosing acute appendicitis: are we overusing radiologic investigations? J Pediatr Surg 43(12):2239–2241

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Andersson RE (2004) Meta-analysis of the clinical and laboratory diagnosis of appendicitis. Br J Surg 91(1):28–37

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Anielski R, Kusnierz-Cabala B, Szafraniec K (2010) An evaluation of the utility of additional tests in the preoperative diagnostics of acute appendicitis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 395(8):1061–1068

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Eriksson S, Granstrom L, Carlstrom A (1994) The diagnostic value of repetitive preoperative analyses of C-reactive protein and total leucocyte count in patients with suspected acute appendicitis. Scand J Gastroenterol 29(12):1145–1149

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gronroos JM, Gronroos P (1999) Leucocyte count and C-reactive protein in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Br J Surg 86(4):501–504

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gurleyik E, Gurleyik G, Unalmiser S (1995) Accuracy of serum C-reactive protein measurements in diagnosis of acute appendicitis compared with surgeon’s clinical impression. Dis Colon Rectum 38(12):1270–1274

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim E, Subhas G, Mittal VK et al (2009) C-reactive protein estimation does not improve accuracy in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in pediatric patients. Int J Surg 7(1):74–77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kwan KY, Nager AL (2010) Diagnosing pediatric appendicitis: usefulness of laboratory markers. Am J Emerg Med 28(9):1009–1015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pruekprasert P, Maipang T, Geater A et al (2004) Accuracy in diagnosis of acute appendicitis by comparing serum C-reactive protein measurements, Alvarado score and clinical impression of surgeons. J Med Assoc Thail 87(3):296–303

    Google Scholar 

  13. Thompson MM, Underwood MJ, Dookeran KA et al (1992) Role of sequential leucocyte counts and C-reactive protein measurements in acute appendicitis. Br J Surg 79(8):822–824

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Becker KL, Snider R, Nylen ES (2008) Procalcitonin assay in systemic inflammation, infection, and sepsis: clinical utility and limitations. Crit Care Med 36(3):941–952

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Alvarado A (1986) A practical score for the early diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Ann Emerg Med 15(5):557–564

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Huang Y, Pepe MS (2009) Biomarker evaluation and comparison using the controls as a reference population. Biostatistics 10(2):228–244

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pepe MS, Longton G (2005) Standardizing diagnostic markers to evaluate and compare their performance. Epidemiology 16(5):598–603

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fluss R, Faraggi D, Reiser B (2005) Estimation of the Youden index and its associated cutoff point. Biom J47(4):458–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Koivula I, Hämäläinen S, Jantunen E et al (2011) Elevated procalcitonin predicts Gram-negative sepsis in haematological patients with febrile neutropenia. Scand J Infect Dis 43(6–7):471–478

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lien WC, Chen CJ (2012) Male gender is a risk factor for recurrent appendicitis following nonoperative treatment. World J Surg 36:488–489. doi:10.1007/s00268-011-1371-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Oshita H, Sakurai J, Kamitsuna M (2010) Semi-quantitative procalcitonin test for the diagnosis of bacterial infection: clinical use and experience in Japan. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 43(3):222–227

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Chakhunashvili L, Inasaridze A, Svanidze S et al (2005) Procalcitonin as the biomarker of inflammation in diagnostics of pediatric appendicular peritonitis and for the prognosis of early postoperative complications. Georgian Med News (129):78–81

  23. Kafetzis DA, Velissariou IM, Nikolaides P et al (2005) Procalcitonin as a predictor of severe appendicitis in children. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 24(7):484–487

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kisacik B, Kalyoncu U, Erol MF et al (2007) Accurate diagnosis of acute abdomen in FMF and acute appendicitis patients: how can we use procalcitonin? Clin Rheumatol 26(12):2059–2062

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sand M, Trullen XV, Bechara FG et al (2009) A prospective bicenter study investigating the diagnostic value of procalcitonin in patients with acute appendicitis. Eur Surg Res 43(3):291–297

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Alder AC, Fomby TB, Woodward WA et al (2010) Association of viral infection and appendicitis. Arch Surg 145(1):63–71

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kessler N, Cyteval C, Gallix B et al (2004) Appendicitis: evaluation of sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of US, Doppler US, and laboratory findings. Radiology 230(2):472–478

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Abdeldaim Y, Mahmood S, McAvinchey D (2007) The Alvarado score as a tool for diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Ir Med J 100(1):342

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Andersson M, Andersson RE (2008) The appendicitis inflammatory response score: a tool for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis that outperforms the Alvarado score. World J Surg 32(8):1843–1849. doi:10.1007/s00268-008-9649-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Chien-Chang Lee or Shy-Shin Chang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wu, JY., Chen, HC., Lee, SH. et al. Diagnostic Role of Procalcitonin in Patients with Suspected Appendicitis. World J Surg 36, 1744–1749 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-012-1579-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-012-1579-z

Keywords

Navigation