Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Laparoscopy-assisted Proximal Gastrectomy with Sentinel Node Mapping for Early Gastric Cancer

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy (LAPG) remains a relatively uncommon procedure because of certain technical issues, such as curability, safety, and retention of postoperative patients’ quality of life. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the feasibility of a newly developed LAPG procedure for early-stage proximal gastric cancer.

Methods

We enrolled 37 consecutive patients who were preoperatively diagnosed with cT1N0M0 primary gastric cancer in the upper third of the stomach with the primary tumor diameter less than 4 cm. Laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy with sentinel node (SN) mapping and esophagogastric anastomosis with a circular stapler and transoral placement of the anvil was attempted.

Results

The LAPG procedure was completed in 36 patients. It was converted to laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy in one patient because one SN detected intraoperatively was positive for metastasis by intraoperative pathological diagnosis. There were no severe postoperative complications in any patient. Only one patient (3%) complained of mild reflux symptoms immediately after operation, which were graded endoscopically as B by the Los Angeles Classification of gastroesophageal reflux disease; however, the symptoms were controlled well by a proton-pump inhibitor. Sentinel nodes were detected successfully in 37 (100%) of our patients. The mean number of dissected lymph nodes and identified SNs per case was 29.7 and 5.8, respectively. The sensitivity of prediction of nodal metastasis (including isolated tumor cells) and diagnostic accuracy based on SN status were 100% (3/3) and 100% (37/37), respectively. All patients have been free from recurrence for a median follow-up period of 26 months.

Conclusions

This study reveals that our novel LAPG approach is curative and represents a feasible minimally invasive surgical procedure with minimal morbidity and postoperative reflux esophagitis in patients with upper-third early-stage gastric cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sano T, Hollowood K (2006) Early gastric cancer: diagnosis and less invasive treatments. Scand J Surg 95:249–255

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kitano S, Iso Y, Moriyama M et al (1994) Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 4:146–148

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Adachi Y, Shiraishi N, Shiromizu A et al (2000) Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy compared with conventional open gastrectomy. Arch Surg 135:806–810

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Shinohara T, Kanaya S, Taniguchi K et al (2009) Laparoscopic total gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for gastric cancer. Arch Surg 144:1138–1142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hur H, Jeon HM, Kim W (2008) Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for T2b advanced gastric cancers: three years’ experience. J Surg Oncol 98:515–519

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim YW, Baik YH, Yun YH et al (2008) Improved quality of life outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: results of a prospective randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg 248:721–727

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Powell J, McConkey CC (1990) Increasing incidence of adenocarcinoma of the gastric cardia and adjacent sites. Br J Cancer 62:440–443

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Blot WJ, Devesa SS, Kneller RW et al (1991) Rising incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastric cardia. JAMA 265:1287–1289

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Papachristou DN, Fortner JG (1996) Adenocarcinoma of the gastric cardia: the choice of gastrectomy. Ann Surg 192:58–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Harrison LE, Karpeh MS, Brennan MF (1998) Total gastrectomy is not necessary for proximal gastric cancer. Surgery 123:127–130

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Adachi Y, Inoue T, Hagino Y et al (1999) Surgical results of proximal gastrectomy for early-stage gastric cancer: jejunal interposition and gastric tube reconstruction. Gastric Cancer 2:40–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Shiraishi N, Adachi Y, Kitano S et al (2002) Clinical outcome of proximal versus total gastrectomy for proximal gastric cancer. World J Surg 26:1150–1154

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Katai H, Sano T, Fukagawa T et al (2003) Prospective study of proximal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer in the upper third of the stomach. Br J Surg 90:850–853

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Morton DL, Wen DR, Wong JH et al (1992) Techinical details of intraoperative lymphatic mapping for early stage melanoma. Arch Surg 127:392–399

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kitagawa Y, Fujii H, Mukai M et al (2000) The role of the sentinel lymph node in gastrointestinal cancer. Surg Clin North Am 80:1799–1809

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kitagawa Y, Kitano S, Kubota T et al (2005) Minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer—toward a confluence of two major streams: a review. Gastric Cancer 8:103–110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kitagawa Y, Fujii H, Kumai K et al (2005) Recent advances in sentinel node navigation for gastric cancer: a paradigm shift of surgical management. J Surg Oncol 90:147–152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kitagawa Y, Kitajima M (2006) Diagnostic validity of radio-guided sentinel node mapping for gastric cancer—a review of current status and future direction. Surg Technol Int 15:32–36

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Aihara R, Mochiki E, Ohno T et al (2010) Laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy with gastric tube reconstruction for early gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 24:2343–2348

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sakuramoto S, Yamashita K, Kikuchi S et al (2009) Clinical experience of laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy with Toupet-like partial fundoplication in early gastric cancer for preventing reflux esophagitis. J Am Coll Surg 209:344–351

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (2010) Japanese classification of gastric cancer, 14th edn. Kanehara Publishing Co, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  22. Saikawa Y, Otani Y, Kitagawa Y et al (2006) Interim results of sentinel node biopsy during laparoscopic gastrectomy: possible role in function-preserving surgery for early cancer. World J Surg 30:1962–1968

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (2010) Gastric cancer treatment guidelines, 3rd edn. Kanehara Publishing Co, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kurihara N, Kubota T, Otani Y et al (1998) Lymph node metastasis of early gastric cancer with submucosal invasion. Br J Surg 85:835–839

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kong SH, Kim JW, Lee HJ et al (2010) Reverse double-stapling end-to-end esophagogastrostomy in proximal gastrectomy. Dig Surg 27:170–174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Takeuchi H, Saikawa Y, Kitagawa Y (2009) Laparoscopic sentinel node navigation surgery for early gastric cancer. Asian J Endosc Surg 2:13–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kitagawa Y, Saikawa Y, Takeuchi H (2006) Sentinel node navigation in early stage gastric cancer—updated data and current status. Scand J Surg 95:256–259

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Burian M, Stein HJ, Sendler A (2004) Sentinel node detection in Barrett’s and cardia cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 3:255S–258S

    Google Scholar 

  29. Oka M, Yamamoto K, Nakamura M et al (1998) Reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy using a stapled, U-shaped jejunal pouch. J Am Coll Surg 186:601–603

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Uyama I, Sugioka A, Fujita J et al (2000) Completely laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition and lymphadenectomy. J Am Coll Surg 191:114–119

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Takeshita K, Saito N, Saeki I et al (1997) Proximal gastrectomy and jejunal pouch interposition for the treatment of early cancer in the upper third of the stomach: surgical techniques and evaluation of postoperative function. Surgery 121:278–286

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Yoo CH, Sohn BH, Han WK et al (2005) Proximal gastrectomy reconstructed by jejunal pouch interposition for upper third gastric cancer: prospective randomized study. World J Surg 29:1592–1599

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Uyama I, Sugioka A, Matsui H et al (2001) Laparoscopic side-to-side esophagogastrostomy using a linear stapler after proximal gastrectomy. Gastric Cancer 4:98–102

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Tonouchi H, Mohri Y, Tanaka K et al (2006) Hemidouble stapling for esophagogastrostomy during laparoscopically assisted proximal gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 16:242–244

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hiki N, Fukunaga T, Yamaguchi T et al (2007) Laparoscopic esophagogastric circular stapled anastomosis: a modified technique to protect the esophagus. Gastric Cancer 10:181–186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Nguyen TN, Hinojosa MW, Smith BR et al (2008) Thoracoscopic construction of an intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis using a circular stapler: transoral placement of the anvil. Ann Thorac Surg 86:989–992

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Irino T, Takeuchi H, Ozawa S et al (2010) Age and body mass index: significant predictive factors for successful laparoscopic antireflux surgery. Surg Today 40:1137–1143

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Svedlund J, Sjodin I, Dotevall G (1988) GSRS-a clinical rating score for gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with irritable bowel syndrome and peptic ulcer disease. Dig Dis Sci 33:129–134

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Velanovich V (1998) Comparison of generic (SF-36) vs. disease-specific (GERD-HRQL) quality-of-life scales for gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Gastrointest Surg 2:141–145

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan

    Hiroya Takeuchi, Takashi Oyama, Satoshi Kamiya, Rieko Nakamura, Tsunehiro Takahashi, Norihito Wada, Yoshiro Saikawa & Yuko Kitagawa

Authors
  1. Hiroya Takeuchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Takashi Oyama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Satoshi Kamiya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Rieko Nakamura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Tsunehiro Takahashi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Norihito Wada
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yoshiro Saikawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Yuko Kitagawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiroya Takeuchi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Takeuchi, H., Oyama, T., Kamiya, S. et al. Laparoscopy-assisted Proximal Gastrectomy with Sentinel Node Mapping for Early Gastric Cancer. World J Surg 35, 2463–2471 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-011-1223-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-011-1223-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation