Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Endovenous Ablation for the Treatment of Chronic Venous Insufficiency and Venous Ulcerations

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Conventional treatment of chronic venous disease with ulceration is layered compression dressings. Saphenous vein stripping is reserved for recurrent or nonhealing ulcers. This study examines outcomes of aggressive endovenous therapy in promoting ulcer healing and/or preventing ulcer recurrence. The role of additional perforator vein ablation also is analyzed.

Methods

This retrospective chart review occurred during a 2.5-year time frame during which 356 patients with venous insufficiency were seen in our vein center and underwent 412 venous operations (56 with bilateral disease treated on separate dates). A cohort of 75 (21.1%) patients with severe chronic venous disease underwent 83 (20.1%) procedures (C5: n = 52, 63%; C6: n = 31, 37%); 8 patients had bilateral procedures. Data analysis included body-mass index (BMI), history of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or previous vein surgery, and type of procedure (radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of greater saphenous vein (GSV) alone or GSV and perforator ablation (GSVP)). Complications, ulcer healing rates, and recurrent ulcerations were examined. Descriptive statistics are reported and contingency tables used when appropriate.

Results

Overall, the patients were 63.5 ± 13.4 years of age (men: n = 36, women: n = 39) with a BMI of 32.4 (range, 20.8–53.4). All of the patients had GSV insufficiency and 30 (44%) patients had deep vein incompetence. Only 19 (28%) patients had a history of a DVT and 13 (19%) had previous vein procedures. The 31 extremities with C6 disease had been treated conservatively with compression for an average of 7.6 ± 4.2 (range, 1–156) months before undergoing ablation. Ablation site was GSV in 49 (72%) and GSVP in 19 (28%). Only two (2.9%) complications occurred: excessive hemosiderin staining and paresthesias each occurred in one patient. Of the C5 patients treated, two (4.7%) developed recurrent ulcerations and five (20%) C6 patients did not heal completely or developed a recurrent ulcer. There was no statistically significant difference in ulcer healing or recurrence rates between C5 and C6 patients treated with and without the addition of perforator interruption.

Conclusions

Chronic venous insufficiency with active or healed ulceration is commonly seen in our academic vein center. In this series, endovenous ablation allowed for excellent healing rates and acceptable recurrent ulcer rates. It is unclear from this small cohort whether the addition of perforator ablation was of benefit in improving venous hemodynamics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Beebe HG, Bergan JJ, Bergqvist D et al (1996) Classification and grading of chronic venous disease in the lower limbs. A consensus statement. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 12:487–491 discussion 491–492

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Carr SC (2008) Diagnosis and management of venous ulcers. Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther 20:82–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Barwell JR, Davies CE, Deacon J et al (2004) Comparison of surgery and compression with compression alone in chronic venous ulceration (ESCHAR study): randomised controlled trial. Lancet 363:1854–1859

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Howard DP, Howard A, Kothari A, Wales L, Guest M, Davies AH (2008) The role of superficial venous surgery in the management of venous ulcers: a systematic review. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 36:458–465

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gohel MS, Barwell JR, Taylor M et al (2007) Long term results of compression therapy alone versus compression plus surgery in chronic venous ulceration (ESCHAR): randomised controlled trial. BMJ 335:83

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. O’Donnell TF Jr (2008) The present status of surgery of the superficial venous system in the management of venous ulcer and the evidence for the role of perforator interruption. J Vasc Surg 48:1044–1052

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Porter JM, Moneta GL (1995) Reporting standards in venous disease: an update. International Consensus Committee on Chronic Venous Disease. J Vasc Surg 21:635–645

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bush RL, Ramone-Maxwell C (2008) Endovenous and surgical extirpation of lower-extremity varicose veins. Semin Vasc Surg 21:50–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. van den Bos RR, Wentel T, Neumann MH, Nijsten T (2009) Treatment of incompetent perforating veins using the radiofrequency ablation stylet: a pilot study. Phlebology 24:208–212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nicolaides AN, Allegra C, Bergan J et al (2008) Management of chronic venous disorders of the lower limbs: guidelines according to scientific evidence. Int Angiol 27:1–59

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Partsch H, Clark M, Mosti G et al (2008) Classification of compression bandages: practical aspects. Dermatol Surg 34:600–609

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Maurins U, Hoffmann BH, Losch C, Jockel KH, Rabe E, Pannier F (2008) Distribution and prevalence of reflux in the superficial and deep venous system in the general population—results from the Bonn Vein Study, Germany. J Vasc Surg 48:680–687

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. van Gent WB, Hop WC, van Praag MC, Mackaay AJ, de Boer EM, Wittens CH (2006) Conservative versus surgical treatment of venous leg ulcers: a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial. J Vasc Surg 44:563–571

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wright DD (2009) The ESCHAR trial: should it change practice? Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther 21:69–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Recek C (2006) Impact of the calf perforators on the venous hemodynamics in primary varicose veins. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 47:629–635

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. van den Bremer J, Hedeman Joosten PP, Moll FL (2007) Endovenous laser therapy: a new treatment for varicose veins. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 151:960–965

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rutherford EE, Kianifard B, Cook SJ, Holdstock JM, Whiteley MS (2001) Incompetent perforating veins are associated with recurrent varicose veins. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 21:458–460

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Myers KA, Ziegenbein RW, Zeng GH, Matthews PG (1995) Duplex ultrasonography scanning for chronic venous disease: patterns of venous reflux. J Vasc Surg 21:605–612

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Peden E, Lumsden A (2007) Radiofrequency ablation of incompetent perforator veins. Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther 19:73–77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lees TA, Lambert D (1993) Patterns of venous reflux in limbs with skin changes associated with chronic venous insufficiency. Br J Surg 80:725–728

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yamamoto N, Unno N, Mitsuoka H et al (2002) Preoperative and intraoperative evaluation of diameter–reflux relationship of calf perforating veins in patients with primary varicose vein. J Vasc Surg 36:1225–1230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tenbrook JA Jr, Iafrati MD, O’Donnell TF Jr et al (2004) Systematic review of outcomes after surgical management of venous disease incorporating subfascial endoscopic perforator surgery. J Vasc Surg 39:583–589

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Luebke T, Brunkwall J (2009) Meta-analysis of subfascial endoscopic perforator vein surgery (SEPS) for chronic venous insufficiency. Phlebology 24:8–16

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosure

Dr. Ruth L. Bush is a proctor/consultant for VNUS Inc. This study represents original non-industry-funded work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Scott & White Hospital, Texas A&M College of Medicine, Division of Vascular Surgery, 2301 S. 31st Street, Temple, TX, 76508, USA

    Christopher J. Marrocco, Marvin D. Atkins, W. Todd Bohannon, Thomas R. Warren, Clifford J. Buckley & Ruth L. Bush

Authors
  1. Christopher J. Marrocco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marvin D. Atkins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. W. Todd Bohannon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Thomas R. Warren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Clifford J. Buckley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ruth L. Bush
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ruth L. Bush.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marrocco, C.J., Atkins, M.D., Todd Bohannon, W. et al. Endovenous Ablation for the Treatment of Chronic Venous Insufficiency and Venous Ulcerations. World J Surg 34, 2299–2304 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0659-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0659-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation