Skip to main content
Log in

Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Pancreaticoduodenectomy in Patients Older Than 70 Years: A Comparative Study

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) remains one of the most challenging abdominal procedures and its application in the elderly population is poorly reported in the literature so far. The goal of this study was to demonstrate that robot-assisted PD can be safely performed in patients aged 70 years and older.

Methods

Forty-one consecutive robot-assisted PD performed between April 2007 and January 2010 were prospectively entered in a dedicated database. Patients were stratified into two groups: group 1, aged ≥70 years (n = 15, 36.6%); and group 2, aged <70 years (n = 26, 63.4%). The data were reviewed retrospectively.

Results

Indications for surgery and patient characteristics were the same in both groups, with the exception of age. There was no statistical difference in terms of operative time (P = 0.376), blood loss (P = 0.989), conversion rate (P = 0.52), mortality (P = 0.36), or overall morbidity rate (P = 0.74). The mean hospital stay was 14.3 days in group 1 and 11.2 days in group 2. This was not statistically significant (P = 0.136).

Conclusions

Robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy can be performed safely in elderly patients with comparable mortality, morbidity, and outcomes compared with a younger population. Age alone should not be a contraindication for robotic pancreatic resection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gagner M, Palermo M (2009) Laparoscopic Whipple procedure: review of the literature. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 16:726–730

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kendrick ML, Cusati D (2010) Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: feasibility and outcome in an early experience. Arch Surg 145:19–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gagner M, Pomp A (1994) Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc 8:408–410

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Milone L, Turner P, Gagner M (2004) Laparoscopic surgery for pancreatic tumors, an uptake. Minerva Chir 59:165–173

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Palanivelu C, Jani K, Senthilnathan P et al (2007) Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: technique and outcomes. J Am Coll Surg 205:222–230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Palanivelu C, Rajan PS, Rangarajan M et al (2009) Evolution in techniques of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a decade long experience from a tertiary center. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 16:731–740

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dulucq JL, Wintringer P, Mahajna A (2006) Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for benign and malignant diseases. Surg Endosc 20:1045–1050

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pugliese R, Scandroglio I, Sansonna F et al (2008) Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective review of 19 cases. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 18:13–18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gagner M, Pomp A (1997) Laparoscopic pancreatic resection: is it worthwhile? J Gastrointest Surg 1:20–25

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Brozzetti S, Mazzoni G, Miccini M et al (2006) Surgical treatment of pancreatic head carcinoma in elderly patients. Arch Surg 141:137–142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fong Y, Blumgart LH, Fortner JG et al (1995) Pancreatic or liver resection for malignancy is safe and effective for the elderly. Ann Surg 222:426–434

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hodul P, Tansey J, Golts E et al (2001) Age is not a contraindication to pancreaticoduodenectomy. Am Surg 67:270–275

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Makary MA, Winter JM, Cameron JL et al (2006) Pancreaticoduodenectomy in the very elderly. J Gastrointest Surg 10:347–356

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Riall TS (2009) What is the effect of age on pancreatic resection? Adv Surg 43:233–249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Scurtu R, Bachellier P, Oussoultzoglou E et al (2006) Outcome after pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer in elderly patients. J Gastrointest Surg 10:813–822

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Giulianotti PC, Sbrana F, Bianco FM et al (2010) Robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreatic surgery: single-surgeon experience. Surg Endosc Jan 9 [Epub ahead of print]

  17. Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M et al (2003) Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg 138:777–784

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G et al (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138:8–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Darwin P, Goldberg E, Uradomo L (2010) Jackson Pratt drain fluid-to-serum bilirubin concentration ratio for the diagnosis of bile leaks. Gastrointest Endosc 71:99–104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. van Berge Henegouwen MI, van Gulik TM, DeWit LT et al (1997) Delayed gastric emptying after standard pancreaticoduodenectomy versus pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy: an analysis of 200 consecutive patients. J Am Coll Surg 185:373–379

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Young J (2009) Understanding statistical analysis in the surgical literature: some key concepts. ANZ J Surg 79:398–403

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tran K, Van Eijck C, Di Carlo V et al (2002) Occlusion of the pancreatic duct versus pancreaticojejunostomy: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 236:422–428

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

We certify that we have no conflict of interest or relevant financial interest in this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pier C. Giulianotti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Buchs, N.C., Addeo, P., Bianco, F.M. et al. Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Pancreaticoduodenectomy in Patients Older Than 70 Years: A Comparative Study. World J Surg 34, 2109–2114 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0650-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0650-x

Keywords

Navigation