Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of Intraoperative Liver Deformation During Hepatic Resection: Prospective Clinical Study

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The implementation of intraoperative navigation in liver surgery is handicapped by intraoperative organ shift, tissue deformation, the absence of external landmarks, and anatomical differences in the vascular tree. To investigate the impact of surgical manipulation on the liver surface and intrahepatic structures, we conducted a prospective clinical trial.

Methods

Eleven consecutive patients [4 female and 7 male, median age = 67 years (range = 54–80)] with malignant liver disease [colorectal metastasis (n = 9) and hepatocellular cancer (n = 2)] underwent hepatic resection. Pre- and intraoperatively, all patients were studied by CT-based 3D imaging and assessed for the potential value of computer-assisted planning. The degree of liver deformation was demonstrated by comparing pre- and intraoperative imaging.

Results

Intraoperative CT imaging was successful in all patients. We found significant deformation of the liver. The deformation of the segmental structures is reflected by the observed variation of the displacements. There is no rigid alignment of the pre- and intraoperative organ positions due to overall deflection of the liver. Locally, a rigid alignment of the anatomical structure can be achieved with less than 0.5 cm discrepancy relative to a segmental unit of the liver. Changes in total liver volume range from −13 to +24%, with an average absolute difference of 7%.

Conclusions

These findings are fundamental for further development and optimization of intraoperative navigation in liver surgery. In particular, these data will play an important role in developing automation of intraoperative continuous registration. This automation compensates for liver shift during surgery and permits real-time 3D visualization of navigation imaging.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Auer LM, Auer DP (1998) Virtual endoscopy for planning and simulation of minimally invasive neurosurgery. Neurosurgery 43:529–537

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kockro RA, Serra L, Tseng-Tsai Y et al (2000) Planning and simulation of neurosurgery in a virtual reality environment. Neurosurgery 46:118–135

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chao EY, Barrance P, Genda E et al (1997) Virtual reality (VR) techniques in orthopaedic research and practice. Stud Health Technol Inform 39:107–114

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sutherland CJ (1986) Practical application of computer-generated three-dimensional reconstructions in orthopedic surgery. Orthop Clin North Am 17:651–656

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fischer L, Cardenas C, Thorn M et al (2002) Limits of Couinaud’s liver segment classification: a quantitative computer-based three-dimensional analysis. J Comput Assist Tomogr 26:962–967

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lamade W, Glombitza G, Fischer L et al (2000) The impact of 3-dimensional reconstructions on operation planning in liver surgery. Arch Surg 135:1256–1261

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Marescaux J, Clement JM, Tassetti V et al (1998) Virtual reality applied to hepatic surgery simulation: the next revolution. Ann Surg 228:627–634

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Oldhafer KJ, Hogemann D, Stamm G (1999) 3-dimensional (3-D) visualization of the liver for planning extensive liver resections. Chirurg 70:233–238

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Heizmann O, Loehe F, Volk A (2008) Ischemic preconditioning improves postoperative outcome after liver resections: a randomized controlled study. Eur J Med Res 13:79–86

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rau HG, Schauer R, Helmberger T et al (2000) Impact of virtual reality imaging on hepatic liver tumor resection: calculation of risk. Langenbecks Arch Surg 385:162–170

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schmidbauer S, Hallfeldt KK, Sitzmann G (2002) Experience with ultrasound scissors and blades (UltraCision) in open and laparoscopic liver resection. Ann Surg 235:27–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Vauthey JN, Chaoui A, Do KA et al (2000) Standardized measurement of the future liver remnant prior to extended liver resection: methodology and clinical associations. Surgery 127:512–519

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yigitler C, Farges O, Kianmanesh R et al (2003) The small remnant liver after major liver resection: how common and how relevant? Liver Transpl 9:S18–S25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bismuth H (1982) Surgical anatomy and anatomical surgery of the liver. World J Surg 6:3–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Couinaud C (1954) Lobes et Segments Hepatiques - Notes Sur Larchitecture Anatomique et Chirurgicale du Foie. Presse Med 62:709–712

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Strasberg SM (2005) Nomenclature of hepatic anatomy and resections: a review of the Brisbane 2000 system. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 12:351–355

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lang H, Junge A, Sitter H et al (1995) Liver segmentectomy as anatomically precise resections. An experimental study in sheep. Eur J Surg 161:677–682

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wigmore SJ, Redhead DN, Yan XJ et al (2001) Virtual hepatic resection using three-dimensional reconstruction of helical computed tomography angioportograms. Ann Surg 233:221–226

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Endo I, Shimada H, Sugita M et al (2007) Role of three-dimensional imaging in operative planning for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Surgery 142:666–675

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lang H, Radtke A, Hindennach M et al (2005) Impact of virtual tumor resection and computer-assisted risk analysis on operation planning and intraoperative strategy in major hepatic resection. Arch Surg 140:629–638

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Saito S, Yamanaka J, Miura K et al (2005) A novel 3D hepatectomy simulation based on liver circulation: application to liver resection and transplantation. Hepatology 41:1297–1304

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cash DM, Miga MI, Glasgow SC et al (2007) Concepts and preliminary data toward the realization of image-guided liver surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 11:844–859

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hayashibe M, Suzuki N, Kobayashi S et al (2005) Development of a 3D visualization system for surgical field deformation with geometric pattern projection. Stud Health Technol Inform 111:172–177

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Jacob AL, Regazzoni P, Steinbrich W et al (2000) The multifunctional therapy room of the future: image guidance, interdisciplinarity, integration and impact on patient pathways. Eur Radiol 10:1763–1769

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bourquain H, Schenk A, Link F et al (2002) HepaVision 2: a software assistant for preoperative planning in living-related liver transplantation and oncologic liver surgery. In: Lemke HU, Vannier MW, Inamura K, Farman AG, Doi K, Reiber JHC (eds) CARS 2002: Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery: Proceedings of the 16th International Congress and Exhibition, Paris, June 26-29, 2002. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 341-346

  26. Preim B, Bourquain H, Selle D et al (2002) Resection proposals for oncologic liver surgery based on vascular territories. In: Lemke HU, Vannier MW, Inamura K, Farman AG, Doi K, Reiber JHC (eds), CARS 2002: Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery: Proceedings of the 16th international congress and exhibition, Paris, June 26-29, 2002, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 353–358

  27. Schenk A, Prause G, Peitgen HO (2000) Efficient semiautomatic segmentation of 3D objects. In: Delp SL, DiGioia AM, Jaramaz B (eds) Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention: MICCAI 2000, Proceedings of the third international conference, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, October 11–14, 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1935, pp 186–195

  28. Selle D, Preim B, Schenk A et al (2002) Analysis of vasculature for liver surgical planning. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 21:1344–1357

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Van Ooijen PMA, Wolf R, Schenk A et al (2003) Recent developments in organ-selective reconstruction and analysis of multiphase liver CT. Imaging Decis 7:37–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Herline AJ, Herring JL, Stefansic JD et al (2000) Surface registration for use in interactive, image-guided liver surgery. Comput Aided Surg 5:11–17

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Voirin D, Payan Y, Amavizca M et al (2002) Computer-aided hepatic tumour ablation: requirements and preliminary results. C R Biol 325:309–319

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Aylward SR, Cleary KR, Hawkes DJ (2005) Intraoperative image processing for surgical guidance. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 24:1401–1404

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Porter BC, Rubens DJ, Strang JG et al (2001) Three-dimensional registration and fusion of ultrasound and MRI using major vessels as fiducial markers. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 20:354–359

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hassenpflug P, Schobinger M, Vetter M et al (2008) Generation of attributed relational vessel graphs from threedimensional freehand ultrasound for intraoperative registration in image-guided liver surgery. In: Galloway RL (ed) Medical Imaging 2003-Visualization, Image-Guided Procedures, and Display. Proceedings of SPIE 5029, pp 222–230

  35. Carrillo A, Duerk JL, Lewin JS et al (2000) Semiautomatic 3-D image registration as applied to interventional MRI liver cancer treatment. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 19:175–185

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Penney GP, Blackall JM, Hamady MS et al (2004) Registration of freehand 3D ultrasound and magnetic resonance liver images. Med Image Anal 8:81–91

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Wilson DL, Carrillo A, Zheng L et al (1998) Evaluation of 3D image registration as applied to MR-guided thermal treatment of liver cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging 8:77–84

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oleg Heizmann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heizmann, O., Zidowitz, S., Bourquain, H. et al. Assessment of Intraoperative Liver Deformation During Hepatic Resection: Prospective Clinical Study. World J Surg 34, 1887–1893 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0561-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0561-x

Keywords

Navigation